Charlie Sheen challenges 9/11 Truth Debunkers to Larry King Live Debate

Tue, 2009-09-15 16:14 by admin

Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:00pm EDT

AUSTIN, Texas Sept. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Appearing on The Alex Jones Show today to discuss his video address to Barack Obama, Charlie Sheen has challenged those who have publicly attacked him for speaking out on 9/11, particularly Meghan McCain, Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly, to debate him on CNN's Larry King Live.

'We're not hiding,' states Sheen as he calls out McCain, Hannity, Limbaugh and O'Reilly

AUSTIN, Sept. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Appearing on The Alex Jones Show today to discuss his video address to Barack Obama, Charlie Sheen has challenged those who have publicly attacked him for speaking out on 9/11, particularly Meghan McCain, Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly, to debate him on CNN's Larry King Live.

Following the publication of Sheen's "20 Minutes With The President," a fictionalized account of a meeting with Barack Obama in which Sheen implores the President to reopen the investigation of 9/11 in light of the majority of the 9/11 Commission members publicly denouncing the official story as a deception, McCain attacked Sheen on ABC's top rated show The View, comparing people who question 9/11 with holocaust deniers.

"I quoted Charlie Sheen yesterday about his experience with prostitutes, so really you're the one I should be listening to about 9/11? . . . I am not going to take my political advice from Charlie Sheen," stated McCain, daughter of the former Republican nominee John McCain.

McCain's sophomoric reliance on attacking Sheen on the foundation of decades old events in his personal life, while failing to address even one of the 20 pieces of evidence raised in his letter to Obama, is typical of the media response to Sheen's challenge thus far.

Amongst the scoffers and debunkers, not one corporate media outfit has managed to actually address a single point Sheen raised in his letter, resorting instead to childish quips and badly researched proclamations.

A familiar theme arising out of such hit pieces is an effort to imply that Sheen's questioning of the official 9/11 story is somehow an "outrage" and hurtful to the family members of the victims, despite the fact that the majority of victims' family members share the same questions.

Furthermore, claiming that people who doubt the government story are on par with holocaust deniers completely ignores the fact that six of the ten 9/11 Commission members, along with scores of other highly credible former and current government officials, intelligence professionals, military officials, scientists, structural engineers and architects, and legal scholars have all publicly questioned the official version of events behind September 11.

Fox News talking heads Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity, as well as popular radio host Rush Limbaugh, have also attempted to attack Sheen's credibility while failing to discuss any of the subjects he actually raised.

In response, Sheen told The Alex Jones Show that he is challenging any one or all of McCain, Hannity, Limbaugh or O'Reilly to a debate about 9/11 on CNN's Larry King Live or any other television show in Los Angeles, adding that the show must be broadcast live to prevent bias editing.

Should the debate go ahead, Sheen will be accompanied by Bob Mcilvaine, a 9/11 families representative who lost his son Robert in the attacks. Sheen suggested that his adversary in the debate be accompanied by representatives from Popular Mechanics, who have routinely sought to debunk questions surrounding 9/11.

"Let's do it," Sheen told the Alex Jones Show Friday. "I issue the challenge to debate Meghan McCain, Rush Limbaugh, Sen Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, bring them all, Bob Mcilvaine and I will join you on Larry King Live and you guys bring whatever you've got ... and we'll show up with the truth and we'll just see how it goes - we're not hiding," added Sheen.

Watch the clip from The View at www.youtube.com/watch?v=yENcu5_7Mdk .

For media requests on this subject email sheen [ AT ] infowars.com

The Alex Jones Show broadcasts live from Austin, TX from 11AM-3PM Central. Alex Jones' show and websites infowars.com and prisonplanet.com are a focal point and a forum where many prominent figures from academia, the political world and Hollywood have spoken out about what really happened on September 11th.

This release was issued on behalf of the above organization by Send2Press(R),
a unit of Neotrope(R). www.Send2Press.com

SOURCE The Alex Jones Show

Rob Dew, or Mike Nelson, both of The Alex Jones Show, +1-512-448-4252,
sheen [ AT ] infowars.com

Puublished at Reuters. Also published on 911blogger.com.
See also: "Sheen Blasts Cowardly Corporate Media Refusal to Debate 9/11 Facts" on Prison Planet of 15 Sep 09, "Twenty Minutes With The President" on Prison Planet, Charlie Sheen talks to Alex Jones - 9/11/09 on 911oz.com.

Topic:

911 truth

Comments

Tigerquoll

Wed, 2009-09-16 17:54

Permalink

Possibly the most important taboo of our time to be challenged

I applaud Sheen sticking his head out. He has chosen an issue far more serious and risky than what many Hollywood famous people who have felt perhaps more a fashionable justification to dabble in noble causes. But for Sheen to step out of a comfortable lucrative acting role and to publicly question the morals of the US administration's official account of 9/11 is surely brave. Al Quaeda's 9/11 mass murder instigated a fresh and spirited George Bush to react. But Bush lacked judgment and failed. Bush poured US billions and thousands of American lives to achieve effectively a Vietnam II. Bush put the US brand generations backward to such an extent as to prevent in one generation Obama's efforts to reconcile the US reputation globally anywhere. Test: eight years later Al Quaeda is still effective. Sheen is damn heroic. The test lies with Obama - for him to call in the facts independently, to park pride, to undertake a root cause analysis, open the issue to the US people and achieve closure. Such is leadership. The world is watching. I was impressed with Charlie's dad Martin in Apocalypse Now. If Charlie executes this campaign well, he will have equalled his father, to which any son and daughter aspires.

James Sinnamon

Thu, 2009-09-17 15:00

Permalink

'Al Qaeda' not the principle perpetrator of 9/11

I am glad to see you share my assessment of Charlie Sheen's courageous stance. Too many ostensibly progressive anti-war types are inexplicably silent on this critical issue. Charlie Sheen puts them to shame.

One concern I have with this post is that you accept that 'Al Qaeda' committed the crime of September 11.

In a sense 'Al Qaeda' may have played some role in September 11, but you need to bear in mind that Al Qaeda was set up by the CIA to fight the leftist Afghan Government of Noor Mohammed Taraki in 1978.

It clearly has remained a CIA asset to this day, notwithstanding the claim that Al Qaeda had 'turned' against US. There is a good deal of evidence of this including testimony from FBI whilstle blower Sibel Edmonds. Please see "Bombshell: Bin Laden Worked for US Till 9/11" of 31 Jul 09.

Even the FBI does not think it has enough evidence against Osama bin Laden to charge him with the 9/11 attack.

So, in fact "Al Qaeda" is largely a bogus anti-Western terrorist organisation conjured up to justify the launching of wars against middle eastern and Central Asian nations and to justify ever greater curtailments of our democratic freedoms. Just possibly 'Al Qaeda' may have planed a role in recruiting Muslim patsies who may have genuinely believed that by participating in the September 11 attacks they would be striking a mortal blow against the Infidel West, but the only people who could have made it possible for September 11 to have succeeded as it did were in the White House.

I strongly urge you to spend a little time researching this in order to arrive at your own conclusions on 9/11. One good place to start would be online forum discussions. It is fairly easy to judge the relative quality of arguments even without initially completely understanding what they are about. In the case of 9/11 my own experience has almost invariably been that one side attempts to completely avoid discussing the substantive issue.

Please check for yourself, for example, in the #comment-825758">forum on Larvatus Prodeo's Saturday Salon.

Tigerquoll

Thu, 2009-09-17 20:20

Permalink

I find it inconceivable that the CIA did 9/11 or killed Kennedy

I shall check your sources, but despite the corruption, underhand and conspiracies that the CIA has exercised, I find it inconceivable that the CIA did 9/11 or killed Kennedy.

James Sinnamon

Fri, 2009-09-18 03:49

Permalink

Why I find it far from inconceivable

If you acknowledge that the CIA was corrupt, underhanded and engaged in conspiracies, then why are you so quick to pronounce it inconceivable to you that it could have had a hand in 9/11 or Kennedy's murder? In any case, I never claimed that the CIA was the sole or even the principle agency involved in either, but it does seem likely that it had a hand in both. If you check the sources and the mountains of other evidence, you will learn of abundant evidence pointing to the complicity of senior figures within the US state in the murder of JFK. Had you heard of Operation Northwoods? The essential details of it are to be found in declassified documents on the public record. It was a plan cooked up by the US Armed Forces Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962 to stage terrorist acts, including plane hijackings against US citizens and even the military and make them appear to have been caused by Cuba in order to provide them with a pretext to invade that country. If they were prepared to murder US citizens back then in order to justify launching wars of aggression, then what makes you think that they wouldn't have done it in 2001? When President John F Kennedy learnt of Operation Northwoods, he stopped it. No doubt this is one of the factors that led to his murder in November 1963. JFK was one of the very few Presidents of the United States to have had the backbone to stand up to powerful vested interests in the interests of ordinary US people. Others were Presidents Lincoln and Garfield who were also murdered. In the same decade that JFK was murdered, three other charismatic and effective political leaders -- Malcolm X, Martin Luther King and Bobbie Kennedy -- who had also resolved to stand up against powerful vested interests in control of the US, were also murdered in very suspicious circumstances, with evidence implicating those other than those who were found guilty of those murders not being acted upon by the police. Do you think that that was an accident? In regard to 9/11 the Official explanation is riddled with absurdities and gaping inconsisitencies. Amongst the most glaring are the explanation of three unprecedented engineering disasters which occurred on that day, namely the 'collapses' of the Twin Towers as well as the 'collapse' of World Trade Center Building 7 which was not even struck by an aircraft. Even news commentators on the day commented on how all these 'collapses' reminded them of controlled demolitions. A vast amount of recorded information including film footage and eyewitness testimony also supported that hypothesis, yet the controlled demolition hypothesis was never even considered by either the 9/11 Commission or NIST which was charged with explaining how these disasters could have happened. The fact that the controlled demolition hypothesis was not explored and that the alternative explanations offered make no sense indicate that these 'investigations' were intended to cover up a crime rather than uncover the truth. Because these investigations were so inadequate many US citizens including those who lost loved ones on September 11, as well as Charlie Sheen, of whom this article is about, are demanding a new investigation. For further information, please visit Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Please consider coming to the conference to be held in Sydney on 14 and 15 November in which evidence that proves that the WTC 'collapses' were controlled demolitions will be presented. If we accept that they were controlled demolitions, then how could Al Qaeda have possibly gained the necessary access to those buildings in order to have planted those charges? Also, check out the web site "Patriots Question 9/11".

Charlie Sheen challenges 9/11 Truth Debunkers to Larry King Live Debate

Topic:

Comments

Possibly the most important taboo of our time to be challenged

'Al Qaeda' not the principle perpetrator of 9/11

I find it inconceivable that the CIA did 9/11 or killed Kennedy

Why I find it far from inconceivable

Add comment

Filtered HTML

Tags in Topic

Help save injured wildlife

Recent comments