In 1999 a civil trial jury found that Loyd Jowers participated in a conspiracy with the US state to kill Martin Luther King. Even though Martin Luther King is world renowned, the results of this trial are still not widely known and probably few Australians have any idea of the truth. The man officially convicted of the assassination, James Earl Ray, died in jail. The civil trial exonerated him. Successive governments had refused to reopen his case. Part of this remarkable story is about the efforts of the King family and friends to bring about a thorough investigation and the absolute recalcitrance of the US government.
Martin Luther King was shot and killed by a sniper on 4 April 1968, while standing on the second-floor balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee.
James Earl Ray
James Earl Ray was charged with King's murder and confessed on 10 March 1969, but then recanted three days later. He was sentenced to 99 years prison. Ray later claimed to have been talked into the guilty plea by his lawyer, in order to avoid the possibility of the electric chair. Members of the King family and friends, notably Dr William Pepper, made unsuccessful efforts to obtain a retrial for Ray. Pepper actually represented Ray in a mock trial on television.
Ray died in prison on 23 April 1998, at seventy years of age. He had his ashes buried in Ireland because he did not wish to be buried in the United States because of the injustice he had suffered.
In response to gathering murmurs of dissent, Gerard Posner wrote Case Closed in 1998, where he claimed to conclusively lay controversy to rest, arguing that James Earl Ray did indeed murder Martin Luther King
Trial finds Loyd Jowers participated in US State conspiracy to assassinate King
In 1999, however, a civil trial jury found that Loyd Jowers, owner of the premises in which Martin Luther King was slain, was guilty of participating in a conspiracy with the US state to murder King. The Complete Transcript may be accessed here (erroneous link removed 20 Oct 11 - admin). The jury's finding was conclusive and exonerated James Earl Ray:
Trial findings
"On the evening of April 4 1968, Martin Luther King was in Memphis supporting a worker's strike. By the end of the day, top-level army snipers were in position to knock him out if ordered. Two military officers were in place on the roof of a fire station near the Lorraine Motel, to photograph the events. Two black firemen had been ordered not to report to duty that day and a black Memphis Police Department detective on surveillance duty in the fire station was physically removed from his post and taken home. Dr. King's room at the motel was changed from a secluded ground-floor room to number 306 on the balcony. Loyd Jowers, owner of Jim's Grill which backed to the motel from the other side of the street, had already received $100,000 in cash for his agreement to participate in the assassination. He was to go out into the brush area behind the grill with the shooter and take possession of the gun immediately after the fatal shot was fired. When the dust settled, King had been hit, and a clean-up procedure was immediately set in motion. James Earl Ray was effectively framed, the snipers dispersed, any witnesses who could not be controlled were killed, and the crime scene was destroyed." (cited at http://911blogger.com/node/22402#comment-225954)
The King family has since concluded that Ray did not have anything to do with the murder of Martin Luther King. You can read a transcript of their press conference to that effect, summing up the outcome of the trial.
Writer, Jim Douglas, one of few members of the public who actually attended the trial was amazed at how little coverage it received. He commented that
Public and press hypnotised by official story ignore trial
This historic trial was so ignored by the media that, apart from the courtroom participants, I was the only person who attended it from beginning to end. What I experienced in that courtroom ranged from inspiration at the courage of the Kings, their lawyer-investigator William F. Pepper, and the witnesses, to amazement at the government's carefully interwoven plot to kill Dr. King. The seriousness with which US intelligence agencies planned the murder of Martin Luther King, Jr. speaks eloquently of the threat Kingian nonviolence represented to the powers that be in the spring of 1968.
An interesting article about both Killing the Dream and Case Closed is "He's Baaack! - The Return of Gerald Posner" by Jim DiEugenio at http://www.ctka.net/pr798-posner.html
It may also be of interest readers of http://candobetter.org site to know that our article about King's attitude to family planning is among our most visited ever. King was certainly a popular man with a transforming vision which has retained enormous power to inspire.
This little article has been written using notes from candobetter editor and writer, James Sinnamon, plus the articles linked to above, but I am also grateful to wikipedia for two articles and photos on their sites about Loyd Jowers and James Earl Ray.
Comments
Anonymous (not verified)
Mon, 2010-05-17 16:11
Permalink
What was James Earl Ray's involvement?
Sheila Newman
Mon, 2010-05-17 21:22
Permalink
Re: James Earl Ray's involvement
James Sinnamon
Tue, 2010-05-18 14:40
Permalink
Bernard Salt marginalises those who dispute assassination myths
I thank Sheila for having raised this critical issue.
The four most charismatic, effective and incorruptible leaders of the 1960's -- President John F Kennedy, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King and Robert F Kennedy -- were all murdered. Those who refuse to believe that these four murders could have been just a coincidence are baited by the establishment as "conspiracy theorists".
An example is an article by Bernard Salt "Jackson's death becomes celebrity thriller" of 2 July 2009. (It was published in the Australian on 2 July here, but the story is no longer available.)
However, I did copy some of it to an online forum:
The article then goes off to raise other conspiracy theories such as those surrounding the death of Princess Diana, the disappearance of Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt and Elvis faking his own death. It is as if Salt means to imply that all conspiracy theorists unquestioningly accept each and every one of these theories.
This is a technique similar to that employed by Time magazine in its article "Conspiracy Theories" around the same time in July 2009. (See article "Time Magazine: 9/11 Truth lumped in with "The Reptilian Elite" and "Holocaust Revisionism" for further discussion.)
Bernard Salt continues:
Naturally, Salt takes a swipe of that most taboo of all conspiracy theories, that of 9/11:
Salt's supposed humour appears to be an intellectually cowardly way of avoiding discussing the evidence.
One of many pieces of evidence that proves that Oswald could not have killed Kennedy or, at least could not have killed Kennedy acting alone is to be found on the very film by Abraham Zapruder that Salt alludes to. That evidence is that the fatal shot pushed Kennedy's head backwards and not forwards --- a physical impossibility if the shot had come from behind Kennedy from the Texas Book repository from which Oswald was alleged to have fired the fatal shot.
It seems that those who like to bait JFK assassination theorists avoid mentioning the other assassinations, particularly that of Martin Luther King.
In part this is because a jury trial found that there was a conspiracy to murder Martin Luther King, as Sheila has shown so it is not nearly as easy to dismiss them.
Also, it is because it can be implied (falsely) that President Kennedy was corrupt and tainted by power merely because he held high office and therefore either he somehow got what he deserved anyway or at least his death was no great loss. One who argues the latter is the supposed dissident American intellectual Noam Chomsky.
The same cannot be so easily said of Martin Luther King.
James Sinnamon
Thu, 2011-10-20 21:30
Permalink
Curious silence on Australian forums about Libya, Syria
I attempted to post he following in response to John Quiggin's article, MLK and non-violent protest, but my comment vanished without trace after I hit the "Submit Comment" button. I didn't even see the usual "Your comment is awaiting moderation" notice. I will try again to submit this comment at a later point. John Quiggin had posted at least three articles in support of NATO's war against Libya: All necessary measures of 18 March, The end of tyranny of 23 August and The just fight not fought of 14 September. Some posters challenged John Quiggin's support for the invasion of Libya. There was debate in which John Quiggin's logic did not seem to stand up. He certainly failed to produce the evidence that he was asked for in support of his claims. After that debate John Quiggin has fallen silent on these questions in a fashion similar to larvatusprode.net and WebDiary which have not even mentioned those conflicts. Webdiary has a stated policy of not conducting further discussions on the causes of the 2003 Iraq War or (unofficial) "9/11 conspiracy theories". That policy now seems to embrace discussion of any war that Australia is involved in or which the Australian Government supports.
Martin Luther King once said: "There comes a time, when silence is betrayal."
Whilst silence is preferable to publishing misleading articles, I don't think Martin Luther King would be too impressed with the curious silence that has descended over Australian political discussion forums concerning the ongoing crimes which are being committed against Libya and the crimes which are being threatened against Syria, if he were alive today.
civil trial in 1999 found that James Earl Ray had been framed for King's murder and that King had been killed as a result of a conspiracy by the US Army and the Memphis Police Department.
Update: non-publication appears to be intentional censorship
(12:03PM, 21 October 2011) My second attempt to post the comment to the above forum page similarly failed. How this could have happened unless John Quiggin was intentionally blocking posts by me is beyond me.[1]
I preceded that post with the following:
Ikonoclast (@19) wrote:
Even the most extremely doctrinaire and naive practitioners of "non-violence" are unlikely to have caused nearly as much harm to their followers as those who advocate violent tactics in a society such as our own so easily could.
Although Australia's formal democracy only rarely translates into "Government ... for the people by the people" as, for example, the privatisation of Telstra and Australia's participation in the illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, etc., etc. show, our circumstances could easily be a lot worse.
We still have the right to vote out governments we don't like, and (in practice, if we don't read the fine print of the legislation too closely) the right to free speech and to protest.
Committing illegal acts of violence, when we still have those rights could well give our secret government the excuse it needs to take away those rights. So, I think it is safe to assume that anyone who advocates violent tactics in support of progressive causes in Australia is either an agent provocateur or stupid.
Footnotes
1. What you can do: Consider posting to that page a complaint against apparent censorship on that site. Include in that complaint the full text of the post I attempted to make and a link back to this page. Also, be sure to advise us here on this page of your complaint.
quark
Fri, 2011-10-21 08:33
Permalink
Not impressed
Geoffrey Taylor
Sun, 2012-12-09 23:49
Permalink
Another coverup of Martin Luther King murder conspiracy on SBS
Martin Luther King: Assassination Tapes was broadcast on Australia's SBS on 7 December and is still available on demand until 20 December.
This program reveals much about black labour and civil rights struggles that the Reverend Martin Luther King helped to lead. It shows how Dr King appealed passionately that black Americans protest their grievances through peaceful methods only and appealed to angry black youths to cease their destructive looting of shops and attacks on police.
Nevertheless, the program remains yet another cover-up of the conspiracy by the US military and Memphis Police department found in 1999 by a trial jury to have caused the murder of Dr Martin Luther King on 4 April 1968.
That Martin Luther King was only one of four outstanding visionary and courageous American political leaders murdered in the 1960's, was not disclosed.
Even though Senator Robert Kennedy featured a number of times in the documentary, his subsequent murder on 6 June 1968 was not mentioned. Nor was mention made of the prior death of Robert's elder brother, President John F. Kennedy on 22 November 1963. No mention was made of the attempts by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison to bring President Kennedy's murderers to justice as dramatised in Oliver Stone's epic film JFK of 1991. The murder of that other outstanding black American leader of the 1960's Malcolm X on 21 February 1965 was not mentioned either.
Sheila Newman
Mon, 2012-12-10 13:48
Permalink
M.L. King's assassination and the US system
admin
Fri, 2013-04-05 13:14
Permalink
Trial jury: Conspiracy to kill Martin Luther King
The Conspiracy to kill Martin Luther King: Not a theory but a fact from Global Research, 4 April 2013.
Should the United States government be allowed to assassinate its own citizens? That question was in the air briefly not long ago. April 4 is an excellent day to revive it: On April 4, 1968, the government was part of a successful conspiracy to assassinate the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
That's not just some wing-nut conspiracy theory. It's not a theory at all. It is a fact, according to our legal system.
...
The above was posted to johnquiggin.com. On 20 October 2011, a comment, which concerned this topic, was deleted from that site.
Other posts, the contents of which been labeled 'Conspiracy Theory', have also been censored.
Add comment