Australian mainstream newsmedia 'reporting' of the MH17 tragedy.
29 July 2014: Barely 3 weeks after the destruction of Malaysian Flight MH17 at 13:15 (UTC), 14:15 (WEST) or 15:15 (EUST) according to Wikipedia, the mainstream newsmedia and a number of Australian political leaders including Prime Minister Tony Abbott, Federal Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, Queensland Premier Campbell Newman, have seemingly forgotten how they condemned the East-Ukrainian rebels whom they claimed with certainty had killed the 298 passengers and crew of MH17 with a Buk surface-to-air missile.
Strong forensic evidence is emerging that MH17 was a false flag attack, carried out by agents of the Ukrainian regime (Kiev), installed on 21 March 2014 with many hallmarks of a CIA orchestrated coup. The forensic evidence emerging includes satellite imagery, eyewitness testimony, and two flight recorder black boxes recovered from the wreckage of MH17. The flight recorder boxes were recovered by East Ukrainian rebels and given to the Malaysian government, which has since sent them to Holland, where the investigation is situated. Corroborative evidence has even come from US intelligence agencies.
Given lack of verifiable evidence against the Ukrainian rebels and Russia and the existence of so much evidence contrary to claims made by the Ukrainian (Kiev) regime and its Western masters, the mainstream media seem now to judge it imprudent to continue to so crudely demonise Russia and the people in East Ukraine who are resisting the Ukrainian (Kiev) regime. The 'reporting' has become, in general, more subtle. An example is Lockerbie expert says Malaysians should stay out of MH17 air disaster investigation (28/7/14) in the Melbourne Age newspaper (see, also comment on Lockerbie in MH17 article of 24/7/14). The article commences:
"The lawyer who helped negotiate $2.7 billion from the Libyan government to compensate families of victims of the Lockerbie air disaster two decades ago says the Malaysian government and its agencies should be kept out of the investigation because of an insurmountable conflict of interest.
"Jerry Skinner, a US aviation lawyer who works as a co-associate with Australian firm LHD Lawyers, said potential plaintiffs in the case would almost certainly consider Malaysia Airlines as culpable because 'the airline chose to fly an area that was a known war zone where sophisticated weapons were being used'."
He said allowing the Malaysians to be involved in the investigation had the potential to contaminate the investigation, because the airline's decision and possibly those of any air safety authorities to fly over the war zone, would be central to future compensation cases.
"This could be seen as an intentional effort to confuse the investigation and the Malaysians should be excluded from it," he said.
This seemingly ignores evidence that the pilot of MH17 was ordered to fly over the war zone by an air-traffic controller in Kiev. The Italian air-traffic controller who blew the whistle on this and his Twitter pages have mysteriously vanished. It would be worth following the law suit involving LHD Lawyers to see how successful this argument that Malaysia Airlines should not be trusted to investigate the downed airline incident because of vested interest in the compensation consequences to itself works out to be.
Surely the airline involved in the incident must also be involved in the investigation, if only to be able to monitor process and actions taken by other interested parties which could affect assignment of responsibility. There are indeed other parties in this international investigation with strong motives to tamper with the evidence. They include the US and NATO members and their supporters who have supplied billions of dollars to the anti-Russian fascist Ukraine (Kiev) regime. They include the Kiev regime itself, whose security forces definitely had access to Buc missile launchers and who have committed many documented atrocities in the past few months.
Many observers believe that the US may want to start a war against Russia and that this incident could have been a false flag attack. Such a false flag attack would not be in Russia's interest. Malaysia Airlines has been involved now in two incredibly bizarre incidents in close succession. The extent of coincidence in these incidents is quite suspicious in itself. The first incident is so bizarre that one feels that the world, and possibly Malaysian Airlines, has so little idea of what really happened that detecting motive and culpability beyond the airline itself will be impossible. In the second tragedy, culpability for the launching of a missile and any interference by fighter planes (also alleged) should, on the face of it, be easy to solve in the presence of constant spy-satellite monitoring of the area by Russia and the United States. The fact that satellite photos are so thin on the ground makes it look like international collusion to hide the evidence. Malaysia's bizarre 'bad luck' and the absence of verifiable satellite photos from Russia and the US, plus the host of vested interests apart from Malaysia Airline's, suggest that Malaysia should remain in the investigation. More than this, the investigation should not be conducted in secret and all documents and processes (apart from those of major personal significance) should be made available to a world public.
Add comment