Malaysian Mainstream Media: MH17 was downed by a Military Aircraft, "Cannon Fire from Fighter Jet"

Article republished from (7/8/14, New Straits Times) and Malaysian Mainstream Media: (7/8/14, Global Research).

Since 26 July it has been known that Malaysian airlines Flight MH17 was shot down by Ukrainian air force figher jets and not by a surface-to-air missile launched by anti-Kiev-regime rebels on the ground. German commercial passenger airline pilot closely examined photos of the wreckage on the ground and found exit and entry holes on both sides of the flight cabin holes that could only have been made by projectiles such as are fired by the 30 millimetre cannon with which Ukrainian Sukhoi 25 (Su 25) fighter planes are armed. At least one SU 25 was observed near MH17 by Russian radar. Witnesses on the ground saw two Sukhoi 15 fighters near MH17, whilst the Kiev regime has denied that any of its fighters were in the area.

The following report was by the New Straits Times,  Malaysia's MSM newspaper, quoting previously published articles by Global Research pertaining to the downing of MH17.

This constitutes an important development.

It breaks the official consensus to the effect that Russia was behind the downing of the aircraft.  The Malaysian MSM has presented a viewpoint which goes against that upheld by the Obama Administration

In the face of this overwhelming evidence and much eyewitness testimony from the ground below, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, Foreign Minister Julie Bishop and Opposition Leader Bill Shorten , as . Russian President Vladimir Putin, who allegedly supplied the rebels with the missiles with the surface-to-air missiles, has also been persistently condemned without evidence by these Western politicians, who are bringing the world towards war.

Listed below are selected GR references pertaining to the downing of MH17 by a military aircraft, which were used as source material for the NST article.

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research Editor, August 7, 2014

US Analysts conclude MH17 downed by aircraft

By Haris Hussain 

KUALA LUMPUR: INTELLIGENCE analysts in the United States had already concluded that Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was shot down by an air-to-air missile, and that the Ukrainian government had had something to do with it.

This corroborates an emerging theory postulated by local investigators that the Boeing 777-200 was crippled by an air-to-air missile and finished off with cannon fire from a fighter that had been shadowing it as it plummeted to earth.

In a damning report dated Aug 3, headlined "Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario Shifts", Associated Press reporter Robert Parry said "some US intelligence sources had concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely not at fault and that it appears Ukrainian government forces were to blame".

This new revelation was posted on GlobalResearch, an independent research and media organisation. (emphasis added)

In a statement released by the Ukrainian embassy on Tuesday, Kiev denied that its fighters were airborne during the time MH17 was shot down. This follows a statement released by the Russian Defence Ministry that its air traffic control had detected Ukrainian Air Force activity in the area on the same day.

They also denied all allegations made by the Russian government and said the country's core interest was in ensuring an immediate, comprehensive, transparent and unbiased international investigation into the tragedy by establishing a state commission comprising experts from the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) and Eurocontrol.

"We have evidence that the plane was downed by Russian-backed terrorist with a BUK-M1 SAM system (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation reporting name SA-11) which, together with the crew, had been supplied from Russia. This was all confirmed by our intelligence, intercepted telephone conversations of the terrorists and satellite pictures.

"At the same time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have never used any anti-aircraft missiles since the anti-terrorist operations started in early April," the statement read.

Yesterday, the New Straits Times quoted experts who had said that photographs of the blast fragmentation patterns on the fuselage of the airliner showed two distinct shapes — the shredding pattern associated with a warhead packed with "flechettes", and the more uniform, round-type penetration holes consistent with that of cannon rounds.

Parry's conclusion also stemmed from the fact that despite assertions from the Obama administration, there has not been a shred of tangible evidence to support the conclusion that Russia supplied the rebels with the BUK-M1 anti-aircraft missile system that would be needed to hit a civilian jetliner flying at 33,000 feet.

Parry also cited a July 29 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation interview with Michael Bociurkiw, one of the first Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) investigators to arrive at the scene of the disaster, near Donetsk.

Bociurkiw is a Ukrainian-Canadian monitor with OSCE who, along with another colleague, were the first international monitors to reach the wreckage after flight MH17 was brought down over eastern Ukraine.

In the CBC interview, the reporter in the video preceded it with: "The wreckage was still smouldering when a small team from the OSCE got there. No other officials arrived for days".

"There have been two or three pieces of fuselage that have been really pockmarked with what almost looks like machinegun fire; very, very strong machinegun fire," Bociurkiw said in the interview.

Parry had said that Bociurkiw's testimony is "as close to virgin, untouched evidence and testimony as we'll ever get. Unlike a black-box interpretation-analysis long afterward by the Russian, British or Ukrainian governments, each of which has a horse in this race, this testimony from Bociurkiw is raw, independent and comes from one of the two earliest witnesses to the physical evidence.

"That's powerfully authoritative testimony. Bociurkiw arrived there fast because he negotiated with the locals for the rest of the OSCE team, who were organising to come later," Parry had said.

Retired Lufthansa pilot Peter Haisenko had also weighed in on the new shootdown theory with Parry and pointed to the entry and exit holes centred around the cockpit.

"You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30mm caliber projectile.

"The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes, show shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that these exit holes of the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or bent — outwardly."

He deduced that in order to have some of those holes fraying inwardly, and the others fraying outwardly, there had to have been a second fighter firing into the cockpit from the airliner's starboard side. This is critical, as no surface-fired missile (or shrapnel) hitting the airliner could possibly punch holes into the cockpit from both sides of the plane.

"It had to have been a hail of bullets from both sides that brought the plane down. This is Haisenko's main discovery. You can't have projectiles going in both directions — into the left-hand-side fuselage panel from both its left and right sides — unless they are coming at the panel from different directions.

"Nobody before Haisenko had noticed that the projectiles had ripped through that panel from both its left side and its right side. This is what rules out any ground-fired missile," Parry had said.

The holes in the wreckage of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 are believed to have come from 30mm cannon fire.

Selected Global Research Articles on MH17

About the Malaysian Airlines MH17 tragedy

Australian mainstream newsmedia 'reporting' of the MH17 tragedy.

29 July 2014: Barely 3 weeks after the destruction of Malaysian Flight MH17 at 13:15 (UTC), 14:15 (WEST) or 15:15 (EUST) according to , the mainstream newsmedia and a number of Australian political leaders including Prime Minister Tony Abbott, Federal Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, Queensland Premier Campbell Newman, have seemingly forgotten how they condemned the East-Ukrainian rebels whom they claimed with certainty had killed the 298 passengers and crew of MH17 with a Buk surface-to-air missile.

Strong forensic evidence is emerging that MH17 was a false flag attack, carried out by agents of the Ukrainian regime (Kiev), installed on 21 March 2014 with many hallmarks of a CIA orchestrated coup. The forensic evidence emerging includes satellite imagery, eyewitness testimony, and two flight recorder black boxes recovered from the wreckage of MH17. The flight recorder boxes were recovered by East Ukrainian rebels and given to the Malaysian government, which has since sent them to Holland, where the investigation is situated. Corroborative has even come from US intelligence agencies.

Given lack of verifiable evidence against the Ukrainian rebels and Russia and the existence of so much evidence contrary to claims made by the Ukrainian (Kiev) regime and its Western masters, the mainstream media seem now to judge it imprudent to continue to so crudely demonise Russia and the people in East Ukraine who are resisting the Ukrainian (Kiev) regime. The 'reporting' has become, in general, more subtle. An example is (28/7/14) in the Melbourne Age newspaper (see, also in MH17 article of 24/7/14). The article commences:

"The lawyer who helped negotiate $2.7 billion from the Libyan government to compensate families of victims of the Lockerbie air disaster two decades ago says the Malaysian government and its agencies should be kept out of the investigation because of an insurmountable conflict of interest.

"Jerry Skinner, a US aviation lawyer who works as a co-associate with Australian firm LHD Lawyers, said potential plaintiffs in the case would almost certainly consider Malaysia Airlines as culpable because 'the airline chose to fly an area that was a known war zone where sophisticated weapons were being used'."

He said allowing the Malaysians to be involved in the investigation had the potential to contaminate the investigation, because the airline's decision and possibly those of any air safety authorities to fly over the war zone, would be central to future compensation cases.

"This could be seen as an intentional effort to confuse the investigation and the Malaysians should be excluded from it," he said.

This seemingly ignores evidence that the pilot of MH17 was to fly over the war zone by an air-traffic controller in Kiev. The Italian air-traffic controller who blew the whistle on this and his Twitter pages have mysteriously vanished. It would be worth following the law suit involving LHD Lawyers to see how successful this argument that Malaysia Airlines should not be trusted to investigate the downed airline incident because of vested interest in the compensation consequences to itself works out to be.

Surely the airline involved in the incident must also be involved in the investigation, if only to be able to monitor process and actions taken by other interested parties which could affect assignment of responsibility. There are indeed other parties in this international investigation with strong motives to tamper with the evidence. They include the US and NATO members and their supporters who have supplied billions of dollars to the anti-Russian fascist Ukraine (Kiev) regime. They include the Kiev regime itself, whose security forces definitely had access to Buc missile launchers and who have committed many documented atrocities in the past few months.

Many observers believe that the US may want to start a war against Russia and that this incident could have been a false flag attack. Such a false flag attack would not be in Russia's interest. Malaysia Airlines has been involved now in two incredibly bizarre incidents in close succession. The extent of coincidence in these incidents is quite suspicious in itself. The first incident is so bizarre that one feels that the world, and possibly Malaysian Airlines, has so little idea of what really happened that detecting motive and culpability beyond the airline itself will be impossible. In the second tragedy, culpability for the launching of a missile and any interference by fighter planes (also alleged) should, on the face of it, be easy to solve in the presence of constant spy-satellite monitoring of the area by Russia and the United States. The fact that satellite photos are so thin on the ground makes it look like international collusion to hide the evidence. Malaysia's bizarre 'bad luck' and the absence of verifiable satellite photos from Russia and the US, plus the host of vested interests apart from Malaysia Airline's, suggest that Malaysia should remain in the investigation. More than this, the investigation should not be conducted in secret and all documents and processes (apart from those of major personal significance) should be made available to a world public.