East West Link – The Case for Labor to Terminate the Contracts
The majority of Victorians are opposed to the East West tunnel project. It is not the winner that Denis Napthine had hoped. The public has made it clear that it believes infrastructure spending should be directed towards public transport not roads. They are becoming aware that the tunnel project is in fact a massive misdirection of public funds which does not make economic sense, which will not resolve traffic congestion on the Eastern Freeway or elsewhere, and which will have the effect of denuding much needed funds for public transport infrastructure.
• the absence of a mandate to enter into such a massive project;
• the lack of transparency in the Government’s handling of the project;
• the fact that the whole process has been conducted in secrecy and haste, and
• that it is now clear that the process being conducted is the product of a government acting in bad faith to bind its successors to a contract, which in the ordinary course of planning processes would not be signed until 2015 we believe that Labor’s commitment to honour the contracts if signed is no longer a fiscally responsible nor electorally wise course of action.
Labor therefore needs to state upfront that it will not uphold the contract for the Napthine government’s EW Link proposal because there has been no attempt to define the project in the context of a future for the city that the community wants.
Accordingly, the ALP needs to come up with a visionary comprehensive 21st Century transport infrastructure plan that is economically and environmentally sustainable and which reflects global best practice.
Arguments about sovereign risk are misleading. Visiting ANU Professor Nick Sneddon, Australia’s foremost expert on government contracts has made it clear that there are no legal impediments to state governments cancelling contracts entered into by their predecessors and believes that any compensation arising would be minimal.
A statement before contracts are signed that the ALP will not continue with the contracts will make the situation completely clear to tenderers.
The absence of a mandate for the project, the lack of transparency surrounding it and the serious flaws being identified at the hearings before the Assessment Panel lend support to the view that the responsible course of action is to publicly state that any contracts entered into will not be upheld by Labor.
There are electoral benefits for Labor in taking a stronger stand against the project. The community is hungry for a well-planned and fully comprehensive public transport plan. Labor can mark itself out as a truly alternative government and can damage the current Government by exposing what is essentially a shonky deal being rushed through the Parliament. Investment in comprehensive public transport will create more employment than Labor's target numbers.
Labor must announce that it is not prepared to support this dubious and discredited project, which will be a burden for generations to come.
MCAT Moreland Community Against the Tunnel
For further information Contact: Moreland Community Against the East West Tunnel
E: [email protected] M: 0417 354 169
For further information
Moreland Council: Cr Sue Bolton, mobile 0417 583 664
Moreland Community Against the (EW) Tunnel: Michael Petit, mobile 0417 354 169
Moreland Community Against the (EW) Tunnel: Riki Lane, mobile 0400 877 819
Sat, 2014-05-17 05:39
Budget blow to Victoria - East West link should be scrapped
Victoria has been whacked with a $20 billion funding shortfall for its schools and hospitals in the federal budget, which Premier Denis Napthine has described as a “severe blow”.
The Federal Budget papers indicate there will be an $80 billion reduction in spending for hospitals and schools over the next decade. With cuts to State governments, the funding for hospitals and schools is in doubt.
The total cost to Victoria would be $20 billion over the next decade, and Premier Napthine was angry it came after his government increased funding to hospitals and schools.
If Victoria received the GST it paid the state would be $1.5 billion better off every year and could use the extra money to fill the funding gaps the Abbott government created. Already Victoria's hospitals and schools have suffered from overloading and population pressure, and now they will be worse off - exacerbated by a slash in Federal funding. The rampant rates of population growth our governments boast about, and self-congratulate themselves on, has not brought the promised prosperity, and has increased welfare spending on Newstart due to high rates of unemployment and poverty. Patient demand for public hospital services is increasing, as would be expected given that the population of Melbourne continues to increase by 1,000 each week, and the established population is ageing.
There is no apparent growth in employment opportunities anywhere. Swelling populations together will cuts to hospital funding is a recipe for disaster. Third world rates of population growth ultimately mean third world problems!
With such pressures on costs of living, and service standards, it's madness to continue with the East West link. The public want access to good public transport, education, training, health care, ambulances and health care. The East West link is about caving into the road lobby, not a need.
Sat, 2014-05-17 12:03
Australia's power elite don't intend to rescue us from poverty
Thank you for your continuing comments on candobetter.net.
What is really scary is that the governments at all levels are probably well aware that they are juggernauting us into 'third world' overpopulation and impoverishment. They are doing it as an economic strategy to benefit a small number of people who derive income from investment in assets and resources. They are well aware that mass immigration-fed population growth is swamping our hospitals and primary care systems. They understand that the compensation that GPs now receive per patient is insufficient for them to do a proper job.
They do not care that our health services are increasingly dysfunctional. They are obviously making them more and more dysfunctional, whilst throwing money at their own 'class' to build unwanted infrastructure and to prop up banks.
Because 'good people' believe that their governments could not be so cynical, the politically empowered can get away with empty rhetoric about 'fixing' the problems.
The fact that politicians and those employed by them in the public sector continue to market and support this situation as if it were 'economic growth for the good of all' in the face of manifest contradictions is merely part of a filibustering dialogue of the deaf.
The politically empowered manage in this way to engage the energies of people who, whilst aware that there are big problems, just cannot believe that the people in power are as cynical as they are, in utterly wasteful dialogues with mass media and politicians, plus attempts to go through official processes, like the courts.
Then there is a whole layer of young people who derive their incomes from facilitating these corrupt processes - in legal professions, as reporters, as supports for politicians, as doctors and nurses. They do not dare to engage politically for fear of losing their jobs even at the level of writing on blogs or to newspapers. These people cannot afford to dismantle the system that gives them bread and butter.
Then so many other young people are living hand to mouth in substandard accommodation and putting up with severely stressful situations in boring and scammy jobs, bullied from morning to night, supplementing poor wages with the black economy or jumping through ridiculous hoops to get the dole. One can see that we are reaching a point where figures for unemployment will decline as more people resign themselves to surviving through buying and selling illegal drugs, pimping and prostituting, and other forms of crime - in the black economy. This is yet another sign that we are currently going through a very serious social transformation into a deeply divided society like those of the Philippines and South America under the domination of US-NATO imperialism. I know that sounds very dramatic, but it has already happened to so many countries; you would have to be naive to think it was not happening here. However, given our education system, it is more or less inevitable that most people will not understand these processes which have been historically documented for ages. That too is a product of the reduction of a deep education process into a shallow 'skills acquisition' one. Without education in the humanities - philosophy, political science, literature and history - most people have little hope of understanding their predicament. It was the recovery of the classical humanities and sciences that assisted people to rise above religious fundamentalism in the Renaissance. (Although, at the same time, there was a rise in colonialism and the slave trade.)
I admit that we do still have large quantities of people who do desperately try to help their compatriots through charitable and state intervention. How long can this last when every grass-roots organisation is weakened through the exhaustion of activists who must counter debt, high rents, and survive through long working longer hours, with no hope of pensions or respite? Without sufficient 'leisure' people cannot usefully engage politically or educate themselves beyond mere [transient] commercial 'vocation'.
Don't think that I have given up, but I know that this battle is much harder than it appears to people when they first start out.
It is certainly important for us to maintain sound knowledge bases on the internet as part of our combat against rising global feudalism and the transformation of citizens into 'customers' and indentured servants.
As Joseph Tainter concludes, in The Collapse of Complex Societies, it seems that eventually people break away from repressive and corrupt governments simply by going around them, building their own informal [black and/or cooperative] economies.
It is ironic that we all try to defend our rights as citizens of nations when those nations themselves were bitterly resisted by more localised powers. See Benedict Anderson's Imagined Communites, Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. But citizens of nations, if they have a code, as do the European nations (the code began in France and was a product of the revolution, even though it was Napoleon who had it written down) have rights and institutions to defend those rights.
Globalisation is a terrifying force. Bitcoin may be a part of the solution. I am trying to understand it. Here is an interview on the subject with Roger Ver, Bitcoin entrepreneur.
Once again, thank you for continuing to contribute.
Kathleen (not verified)
Sun, 2014-05-18 15:33
Is opting out still an option?