Plans are already at Frankston City Council for 14, 15 & 16 storey high rise towers at the Frankston Waterfront Precinct. Planning experts and community and environmental groups across Victoria are uniting to demand mandatory height controls to stop a future wall of high-rise developments in Frankston’s City Centre adjacent to the Kananook Creek and within 200m of the coastline.
Community Groups appealing at VCAT
Community groups - Long Island Residents Group Inc., Frankston Beach Association Inc. and Mornington Environment Association Inc. - are off to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) to appeal a 5-to-4 vote by Frankston City Council (FCC) to grant a permit for a 14-storey / 50-metre-high mixed-use building, at Frankston’s Waterfront Precinct. Hot on its heels, an application for an even higher 16 storey / 60-metre-high apartment tower on the adjoining site is now awaiting a decision.
Unlike neighbouring coastal councils that strictly limit building height to two storeys near the coast, Frankston has no mandatory heights for its coastal areas. Appalled by the potential loss of coastal charm and amenity for Frankston, and realising the precedent this might set, community groups across the state, including Protectors of Public Lands (Vic) Inc., Planning Democracy and Beaumaris Conservation Society Inc. have pledged support for the local Frankston campaign.
Port Phillip Conservation Council Inc. (PPCC), a bay wide coalition of 14 coastal groups, and Kananook Creek Association Inc. have also joined the campaign, noting that without mandatory height limits in place, Frankston locals rightfully fear a great wall of towers separating the City Centre from the foreshore, creating a Victorian version of Surfers Paradise.
PPCC Secretary Jenny Warfe says, “If 50 - 60-metre-tall buildings can get the nod in Frankston, that’s a big worry for other coastal towns around the Bay and indeed for the rest of Victoria’s magnificent coastline where developers might decide to challenge local council planning provisions and their commitment to protecting irreplaceable coastal assets.”
“This dystopian vision for the future threatens coastal residents and tourists alike who currently can enjoy access to stunning coastal views, access to beaches and bays and shared amenity. All this could be lost if plans a few developers have in mind for our beautiful coastline came to pass. Local groups everywhere must be vigilant that a threat like the Great Wall of Frankston is not allowed to dominate our beloved coastal towns,” said Ms Warfe.
“Claims that high rise towers help environmental sustainability and housing affordability are both utterly false,” adds The Hon Kelvin Thomson, former Federal Member for Wills and Convenor of Planning Democracy. “These towers will generate massive greenhouse gas emissions, both in their construction and in their operation. They will also increase the price of land in the area and make it even harder for would be first home buyers to compete with developers and afford a home in Frankston.”
Michael Buxton, RMIT Emeritus Professor of Environment and Planning at the School of Global, Urban and Social Studies emphasises that certainty cannot be afforded without mandatory height controls in place. A warning worth heeding. Frankston has now been without mandatory height limits for the waterfront for over 10 years.
“The solution,” Professor Buxton advised the local groups, “is to pressure the State Government to either call in applications or to introduce interim height controls pending adoption and implementation of the (Frankston) Structure Plan.”
With adoption of this Plan potentially mere months away, campaign members are working to ensure far lower height limits for the coastal area than those currently presented.
Community groups are asking Frankston City Council, the Member for Frankston Paul Edbrooke MP, and the Minister for Planning the Hon Sonya Kilkenny to assist in achieving mandatory height limits, setbacks and open spaces between all coastal developments to protect Frankston’s greatest assets – its picturesque foreshore, beaches, sensitive waterways and public spaces - from inappropriate development.
You tube video:
Judy Andrews (not verified)
Thu, 2023-03-09 18:36
Stop the Great Wall of Frankston
Thu, 2023-03-09 19:00
Doesn't make any sense
Thu, 2023-03-09 21:13
Help the community fight this at VCAT thru crowdfunding
The Community Groups appealing at VCAT really need money to pay for legal representation at VCAT and have launched MyCause fundraising campaign at https://www.mycause.com.au/p/309833/stop-the-great-wall-of-frankston
Fri, 2023-03-31 10:28
3 April 10.30am Frankston Life Saving Club help stop the Wall
Sue (not verified)
Tue, 2023-04-04 19:36
Great Wall of Frankston on Channel 9 tonight
Barbara (not verified)
Tue, 2023-04-04 21:27
For those concerned about overdevelopment
Tue, 2023-04-04 22:42
Dead right on overdevelopment and voting
Barbara, you are dead right. The Sustainable Australia Party seems to be the only one serious about stopping overpopulation and overdevelopment. Hard to imagine which independents to vote for, but having more independents may undermine the major parties, which are so invested in population growth and overdevelopment. It is a shame that Clifford Hayes was not voted back in. He made some excellent attempts to reform the land-shark system that the Victorian State government takes advantage of.