Australia's political and electoral system has lost its way. Governments at all levels no longer represent the interests of the people, but the interests of political parties. Many Australians have disassociated themselves with the electoral process.
Representative government and local equity are what Australians yearn for but lack.
Parke's 19th Century three-tier government model successfully retired a colonial system. In 1901, Australia's population was 3.7 million and was comparatively classless and well distributed across the regions
In August 2010, Australia's population is just shy of 22.7 million! Government policies have seen most people concentrated in the capital cities and abandon the bush. Australian society has become distinctly class conscious with a wider gap between the haves and have nots.
Our political system is doing a disservice to Australians. It is time for democratic reform across Australian politics.
One area of targeted reform is the three tier government system, which continues to triplicate public functions with consequential costs and tax waste. Another associated area of targeted reform is the electoral system that allows for two party domination of government by perpetuating safe seats and supported by political donations.
On this last point, the injustice of political donations must end. Wealthy cronies of the major parties, including The Greens, contribute millions every year into the coffers of the dominant oligarchy. Many expect political favours in return and so it is a form of political corruption and corruptibility that must end.
Instead a transparent set electoral allowance needs to be granted equally to each recognised candidate for each electorate in each election. This would restore electoral equity, give all candidates a fair go and encourage more people to get involved in politics at their local level.
Two-Tier Government
Australians need to consider phasing out the antiquated, costly triplication of having three governments. Australia's state and territory governments are colonial dinosaurs. They need to be phased out and abolished.
Visit the Federal Government website and scroll through the list of federal departments, then do the same for
* Victoria departments,
* NSW departments,
* Queensland departments,
* South Australian departments,
* Western Australian departments,
* Northern Territory departments,
* Tasmanian departments and
* ACT departments and ask... why all the bloody departments doing the same bloody jobs?
What's all this wasteful government repetition actually costing Australians?
The questioning of the constitutional monarchy model is a distinctly separate issue and one more symbolic and nostalgic than one likely to make much pragmatic impact on the lives of Australians. The republic push is an ideological distraction.
Whereas 'Two-Tier Regionalism' is about real pragmatic political reform right down to local community level. Lean government and regional equity are what Australians yearn for but lack.
Nationalise State & Territory Functions
We need to phase out Australia's state and territory governments by devolving their powers appropriately to either a national level or regional level.
What benefits would Australians achieve by this?
Those state and territory powers and functions devolved to the national level would consolidate, nationalise, standardise and streamline common nation-wide functions and remove duplication. The types of functions would be the following:
* National Health, Aged Care & Disability (already being touted)
* National Treasury
* National Transport
* National Education and Vocational Training
* National Emergency Services
* National Infrastructure
* National Justice
* National Technology
And no, they don't all have to be be set up in Canberra. Simply utilise the existing state and territory infrastructure, staff and buildings - but nationalise them. Many billions saved in year one.
Maintain the two house system of federal government - no change there.
Regional Counties
Regional functions of state and territory governments need to be redistributed to the local regional level.
* Regional Planning and Housing
* Regional Industry and Investment
* Water and Energy
* Environmental Management
Such power and wealth redistributions back into Australia's regions, will provide greater autonomy, viability and independence to regional communities, which for decades have been starved due to capital city-centric investment.
Regionalism
Regionalism refocuses government, society and business at the regional level, empowering local communities to have greater opportunity into the prosperity of their region.
Importantly, tax wealth needs to be redistributed to the regions. Possibilities include company tax, payroll tax and GST - collected nationally but redistributed back into each region on a per capita basis. The more people in a region, the greater revenues, which would encourage population redistribution more evenly across Australia.
Income taxes remain with national government.
* Merge Australia's 560 local council's into regional counties on a natural bio-regional basis. This would consolidate councils into 85 strong and independently viable new 'counties'.
Restore Democratic Representation
Australia's electoral system has been steadily eroded over the decades by those in power, notably the two dominant parties - Liberal and Labor. Over recent times these two parties have grown closer and closer in ideology and policy, so that these days they spend most of their electioneering trying to distinguish themselves from each other. Labor and Liberal at all three levels of Australian politics have effectively become factions of one LibLab party.
To be truly representative, the electoral structure of these new county governments (for consideration) should breakdown this LibLab stranglehold on government. Our electoral system needs to be restored to being truly democratic. The following two models are worthy of exploring:
A. Mixed member proportional representation model or,
B. Loser delegation in a single-member constituency model, either way facilitating aspects of direct democracy including direct citizen's initiated referenda (along the lines of the Swiss practice).
The above suggestion are worthy of further exploration and debate and are invited on this website.
Further Reading
1. A Two-Tier Australian National State, 1st March 2010.
2. Regionalism;
3. Vision of a two-tier Canada mean-spirited" [The Toronto Star, 20 Aug 2000];
4. Constituencies for Limitation and Regionalism Approaches to Growth Management, by Scott A. Bollens, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, USA, Urban Affairs Review September 1990 vol. 26 no. 1 pp46-67];
5. Destiny Magazine, a publication of the Australian Protectionist Party.
Comments
Search for Truth (not verified)
Sat, 2010-08-07 12:19
Permalink
Two tier? Where to from here?
Does anyone have insight into the views and policies of the various parties and both the party aligned and independent candidates on this subject.
From time to time one hears whispers, for example the other day I learned that Senator Nick Minchin holds federalist ideals. I supported Howard's attempts to assume management of the Murray Darling Basin and K Rudd’s desire to assume Federal governance of the nation's health system as steps in the right direction.
With an election looming it would be nice to know the position of our various pollies on this subject particularly in the Senate.
As John Marlowe says the two major parties are more concerned with seeking re election than necessarily providing the best direction for the country.
I never vote above the line in the Senate and I have had a gutful of waste, duplication and eternal bitching. I would consider designing my senate vote in the forthcoming election on a preferential system designed on this issue regardless of party persuasion but the research to determine the leanings of the individual candidates is a massive task.
Search for Truth (not verified)
Sat, 2010-08-07 12:28
Permalink
Two tier? Where to from here?
Search For Truth (not verified)
Sat, 2010-08-07 12:58
Permalink
Need for Constitutional Change
Search For Truth (not verified)
Sat, 2010-08-07 16:21
Permalink
Reform Information
Add comment