Overloading Australia (Envirobook) 2008, by Mark O'Connor and William Lines states, "We Australians are currently unable to sustain our present population without doing deplorable environmental damage" (p95).
Further evidence of unacceptable environmental damage caused by our population numbers and their ever more intensive activitiesis, lies in the devastating floods in North Queenslandat the moment.
According to hands-on conservation biologist, Hugh Spencer, resident of far north Queensland, the scale and speed of the floods is the result of past clearing of land for grazing and cropping. In the past, much richer, denser levels of vegetation prevented much of the downpour striking the ground directly, retained far more water and greatly diminished run-of, by mechanisms which included transpiration.
Not only do such floods destroy homes, roads, and other infrastructure, they also provoke a constant bleeding-away of rich soil, both inland and onto the Great Barrier Reef. On top of coping with large volumes of silt, the Great Barrier reef has also to cope with chemical fertilisers and herbicides and poisons used in the growing of sugar cane. In the longer term soil loss from the Atherton Tablelands cannot be sustained.
The only way we can hope to prevent further and increasingly severe damage by flooding is to re-afforest the many previously denuded parts of Queensland. This is what Hugh Spencer believes that a good deal of the Federal Government's $42 billion Nation Building and Jobs Plan should be put towards.
Of course, a price to be paid is that not as much land will be available for current grazing and monoculture-agriculture and our ability to either feed ourselves or to earn export dollars will be reduced, but that will occur, anyway in the longer term, if our land is not protected.
Rather than seek to further increase our population as the Federal Government, business leaders and the media are still recklessly endeavouring to do, this country desperately needs to stabilise and, if possible, reduce its population. This must happen at least until such time as we learn how to provide for the needs of the current population without inflicting further harm on this continent.
Comments
James Sinnamon
Sun, 2009-02-08 22:33
Permalink
An oversimplification of causes of floods in North Queensland
This article drew the #comment-228270">following response on John Quiggin's blog:
James Sinnamon
Mon, 2009-02-09 00:01
Permalink
Deforestation doesn't cause floods, but does make impact worse
The following has been #comment-228278">cross-posted to the "Fire and Flood" forum on John Quiggin's blog site.
Thanks for your interest and your response #comment-228270">James of FNQ. I have cross-posted it as a comment to the article. I trust that that is OK with you. Feel welcome to post further comments there or here. You can do so anonymously, subject to moderation, or using an account.
What I wrote was based on my gut feeling which was confirmed by Hugh Spencer who also lives in Far North Queensland. Hugh describes himself as a 'hands-on conservation biologist'. I am sure he will be most interested in your comments and will respond before long.
I didn't actually say that deforestation caused the floods, rather I said that it made their impacts more severe than they otherwise would have been.
Whether the clearing of land happened recently or over 100 years ago it looks to me, on the evidence, like environmental damage, if, as a consequence, floods cause as much damage as they do.
What got me thinking was the brown colour of the flood water and remembering David Montgomery's excellent "Dirt - the erosion of Civilisations" which pointed out that any agricultural system which allows soil to be washed away faster than it can be created (in the order of one or two inches ever century - I don't have the exact figure on me) is unsustainable.
All past civlisations which allowed their soil to be washed away at a rate faster than what could be replaced has collapsed.
The presence of so much dirt in flood waters (and for that matter, in the Barron river, constantly as Hugh had advised me) is a sign that the natural systems which hold soil in place have been damaged and that Australia is headed in the same direction.
Anonymous (not verified)
Tue, 2009-03-17 19:00
Permalink
Australia not overpopulated
Subject was: Population and Deforestation
Are you having a laugh!! This country does not need to reduce its population, if anything, it should be encouraging an increase in population. You can still manage the environment sensibly while increasing the population. If you compare the density of population to many other countries, you will see that Australia is one of the least populated areas, with Queensland not being an excessive amount I must say. To reduce the population is ridiculous, quite absurd.
Anonymous (not verified)
Tue, 2009-03-17 21:56
Permalink
We are over-populated!
Vivienne (not verified)
Wed, 2009-03-18 13:48
Permalink
"Slash" to immigration?
Add comment