Update: #comment-1487">Federal Court bans polluting live export death ships from Australian waters.
Originally published 23 Feb 09.
The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) is responsible for ensuring that all ships in Australian ports comply with s 6.6 of Appendix 4 of Marine Orders Pt 43, which required an effluent treatment plant or holding tank to be part of the vessel. In September 2008, AMSA issued orders under that section to prevent the 28 year old converted car transporter "Al Messilah" from proceeding from Fremantle to Portland to load a cargo of 72,000 sheep.
Rural Export and Trading (WA) Pty Ltd contested the order in the Federal Court on October 3 2008. Amongst its arguments were that this was a discriminatory action against foreign-flagged livestock carriers. RETWA operates the (even older) "Al Kuwait", and the 23 year old "Al Shuwaikh", (all Kuwaiti registered) and also is understood to use the 30 year old ex-car transporter "Merino (aka Cormo) Express", registered in the Philippines.
It should be noted that there are no livestock carriers registered (flagged) in Australia; all, without exception, sail under "flags of convenience" such as Panama, obscure Caribbean nations and the Philippines, where requirements are far less stringent. The crews are from third world countries, and Hansard reports indicate that they are vessels of choice for crews "jumping ship".
The "Al Messilah" is particularly noteworthy because of its voyage from Devonport in February 2006, when 1,683 of the 71,309 sheep on board died during the marathon 24 day journey to four Middle Eastern ports. It was met with a storm of protest in Devonport, where animal advocates painted, quite aptly as it turned out, "Death Ship" on its hull. Advocates also attempted to block the ship's entry in the Devonport channel with kayaks and zodiacs.
The mortality report pointed to Tasmanian sheep being poorly adapted to lengthy, cross-equatorial journeys, the outbreak of a disease (keratoconjunctivitis, or pink-eye) which had first presented at the feedlot prior to loading, the animals not being in the feedlot for the mandated period, and "inanition" (a euphemism for starvation), partly because insufficient fodder had been loaded for the journey. One report suggested that the exporter had expected a higher mortality rate and had deliberately loaded insufficient feed.
The "Al Messilah" was also investigated in 2002 when 2,173 of the 74,985 sheep on board died (report available at www.liveexportshame.com). The "Al Shuwaikh was investigated for two successive voyages in 2002 (20 and V21), when 5,800 and 2,304 sheep died respectively. It was allowed to load again before the reports were completed, and a further 1,000 sheep died on that voyage. The "Merino (aka Cormo) Express" is legendary for its mortalities.
A FOI request to AMSA to elicit the name of the ship in question at the time resulted in a request for payment for this information, and it was sourced from the Federal Court (Austlii) database. Such information should be a matter of public record.
AMSA returned the matter to the Federal Court court in February 2009, before Dowsett, Rares and Gilmour JJ. The transcript indicates that the "Al Messilah" has sufficient pollution equipment to deal with the effluent from the approximately 50 crew if carries - but NOTHING to deal with the effluent from the approximately 80,000 animals it can carry. The judges concluded that Siopsis J, the judge who heard the matter on October 3 2008, had erred in his judgment of October 2008, and AMSA's appeal be allowed, with costs.
The "Al Kuwait" and "Al Shuwaikh" are substantially larger, but are not mentioned in the court transcript.
Given that these ships. and possibly others, are dealing with effluent from upwards of 100,000 animals, what will AMSA do the next time one of these ships attempts to load animals in Australian ports? Each has entered and left Australian ports any number of times since last October.
See also: www.liveexportshame.com, Stop Tasmanian Animal Cruelty at www.stoptac.org.
Comments
Stephanie Dyer (not verified)
Mon, 2009-02-23 16:01
Permalink
Death Ships
Sheila Newman
Mon, 2009-02-23 17:00
Permalink
Politicians protect cruel and exploitative system
Anonymous (not verified)
Mon, 2009-02-23 21:00
Permalink
Platitudes from livestock exporters and farmers
Hilary (not verified)
Tue, 2009-02-24 00:49
Permalink
Farmers should travel with their stock on these death ships
Industry Watch (not verified)
Tue, 2009-02-24 14:01
Permalink
Dirty livestock carriers in Australian ports
stoptac
Tue, 2009-02-24 16:53
Permalink
Cruelty of live exports
Marian Hussenbux (not verified)
Wed, 2009-02-25 06:11
Permalink
British Quakers support Australian campaign against Live Exports
Sheila Newman
Wed, 2009-02-25 11:08
Permalink
How did the Quakers reach their decision?
I would like to know more about how the British Quakers came to that decision. Your society has also made important decisions to found the first humane hospitals for the mentally ill which did not use restraints and for other important acts. Our wider society is incapable of representing us democratically or of prioritising socially beneficial policy over short term monetary policy. Our system is one of 'coasian efficiency', founded on an illusion of material progress. What is the system that the Quakers work on? I wonder what the attitude of the Australian Quakers is.
Sheila Newman, population sociologist
home page
admin
Wed, 2009-02-25 13:46
Permalink
RSPCA won't allow pets to remain in dirty unhealthy environments
Lee (not verified)
Sun, 2009-03-01 21:15
Permalink
Live Export is a serious environmental contaminator
Leon E. (not verified)
Mon, 2009-03-02 09:02
Permalink
Idyllic life of Australian sheep a complete fabrication
Sheila Newman
Mon, 2009-03-02 12:25
Permalink
Overstocking - Economics and politics
stoptac
Sun, 2009-03-08 00:00
Permalink
Live Export Shame Tasmania
admin
Sun, 2009-03-08 17:43
Permalink
Ban live exports to reduce cruelty and keep jobs in Australia
This was posted to me through the contact form. - JS
I am asking myself the question, why is our current and our past Governments, so concerned with sending Aussie livestock live export. Do they have an investment in the dollars generated? Mr Rudd can go to Church
every Sunday and say as much as he likes that he does not abide cruelty to animals. Talk is cheap. Action is the key. Once a year we hear from the RSPCA on banning live export. That seems to dwindle away after a few months. With the Aussie economy so desperate for a boost, why are we not keeping Aussie livestock in this country and doing the processing here, as we always used to do. Millions of tonnes of chilled meat goes overseas every year to many countries. Keep jobs in Australia. Saying a prayer and facing an animal towards Mecca, and slaughtering without pre-stunning is hypocritical. Hundreds, thousands of years ago, I do recognise things were a lot different then. Also the lambs and calves that were killed, with the knife only, were not monstrous beasts bred through constant human manipulation. The animals were generally lambs or very young calves, which died much more quickly when slaughtered.The Koran specifies an animal must be clean, an animal must not have undergone any cruelty, the animals must not see the knife, the animal must not see another animal either being killed or dead on the floor. The whole Halal slaughter requirement is so stupid. I have no problems with the ethics of the Halal slaughter if it is carried out correctly. Our modern day facilities, only take this requirement further by using the pre-stunning. It is so STUPID not to recognise this. Australian meat standards are very high. Farmers also have a very high standard to comply with in preventing livestock from having or carrying any disease. Once the livestock is loaded onto a truck bound for the ports, the stress, the lack of food and water, is the beginning of disease. All mentioned in a previous comment on this forum. All this goes against the "Halal" slaughter requirements. Meat processed in Australia complies with and goes beyond the Halal requirement, not only because it is law, but because of the Animal Advocates in this country that constantly fight for a better "fair go" for Aussie Livestock. Ban live export, do the processing in our own country, good old Aus.
Nicky (not verified)
Sat, 2009-03-21 20:12
Permalink
Update on Kuwaiti livestock ships
Add comment