You are here

Refugees - Living in a media Matrix

See also : Labour’s surrender monkeys dare not criticize Britain's conscript economy of 16 Aug 2013 by Tony Gosling in Russia Today. - Ed

The media’s treatment of the recent tragedy of migrants drowning off the Italian island of Lampedusa was predictable. Whenever a local population—whether it be in Greece, Italy, or elsewhere—is inundated with a flood of refugees, a standard news template is applied.

The formula is to convert a broad social calamity into a heart-rending human-interest story that will provoke an emotional response trumping any sober analysis. The intended message is clear. Any number of refugees have an unreserved right to be accommodated by the host society, at whatever the cost.

And the host society and its politicians have an unequivocal moral obligation to meet migrants’ demands, notwithstanding the burdens of preserving a tattered social safety net in the midst of austerity measures and high unemployment in many Mediterranean countries.

Then we discover that most have fled in the night within a day of being landed on the Italian mainland and being offered six months accommodation, according to Rome Social Services. Many are though to be heading for the more generous benefit cultures in Northern Europe.

The fate of the Lampedusan boat people is tragic, but do the media and politicians seriously think that Europe can take in the populations of Eritrea and sub-Saharan Africa? Where and when will the line be drawn? Do not Europeans—indeed, any people—have the moral right to set limits to their generosity or to husband resources for the primary use of their own citizens?

These are the issues that so many journalists never raise. Apparently the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), the BBC and many others do not acknowledge limits and refugees have rights. That is what we have been told and that is what many of us have come to believe.

Thus it is possible for an indigenous population to see its own displacement as a necessary and vital exercise in humanity, "diversity,” "tolerance,” "pluralism," and democracy rather blatant colonization. In many primary schools in the UK now, virtually 100 per cent of pupils are of foreign origin, where many translators are being hired at public expense to maintain communications in the classroom.

On CBC radio, for example, in a discussion with a French author who expressed concern about growing Islamification of Europe, it was possible for the CBC interviewer to say, without fear of challenge that "we" in Canada are proud of our great diversity of religions and cultures. The multicultural experiment has been a big success. Like the audience, he had lived in the CBC Matrix for so long that he could no longer distinguish between the reality of grassroots concern and the virtual reality that he and others have synthesized over time.

In October and November 2013 the BBC and the UK’s Channel 4 News, did several reports looking at the plight of 'migrant workers looking for a better life' in Athens, southern Italy and Sodertalje - a town south of Stockholm, where the Swedish government's 'remarkable humanity and generous welfare system' has enabled 1000's of immigrants to move in and soon be granted Swedish citizenship.

The Channel 4 news reporter, Matt Frei, noted that they didn't come across any white people while in the town. No mention was made of the views of indigenous Swedes to this social onslaught or whether it was a good policy for Sweden. In the cities of Oslo and Malmo crime rates and attacks on women have gone up significantly. None of this is covered by the international media. The would-be migrants are hardly ever referred to as illegals - always the positive term 'migrant workers', proffering a sense of legitimacy.

Now the Swedish government wants to spread the burden more fairly, pushing other EU countries to take their 'fair share' of this Swedish generosity to would be immigrants. The tone politically and in the media is to unquestioningly accept this continual pressure on the EU, Canada and elsewhere to accept its humanitarian duty, never questioning how this is increasing home grown terrorist threats, food insecurity and infrastructure pressures. It is blatant one-sidedness by a supposedly balanced media.

The migration of Europeans to North America and Australia in the 19th and early 20th century took place in a less crowded world, but large-scale migration now raises vital social, environmental and economic questions about where the world is going and how we deliver reform and a better life for people wherever they are born.

By Tim Murray and Brian McGavin

Comments

Many migrants leave their home countries in order to diversify their livelihoods, increase their incomes and protect their families from risk. By having one or two family members working in Europe, households have a steady source of income.
Tens of thousands of African migrants who risk their lives to make the dangerous journey to Europe by boat each year. Others come hidden in the wheel hubs of tractor-trailers transported by ferry. Some even swim part of the way. Scores die en route.
The agricultural policies and farm subsidies are really making domestic production collapse in a lot of countries in Africa. Cheap food from the EU flooding the African market, and causing people to lose their jobs. There's extreme poverty across much of the African continent.
Due to Colonialism, the individualization of property led to the breakdown of traditional authority and community regulation over common resources.
Some scholars therefore believe that a return to the pre-colonial situation, when traditional institutions once prevailed, will empower communities to manage their resources more sustainably.
Colonialists used the colonies to provide raw materials and other resources for their own economic growth and development. The special attractions of Africa and Asia were, indeed, that they offered many of the raw materials needed by the multiplying factories of Europe: including cotton, silk, rubber, vegetable oils, and the rarer minerals.
Colonialism brought about exploitation of economies and resource primarily through conquest of markets for capital and commodities. Colonialism led to the transportation of many goods to the country which colonised it.
High birth rates contribute to overpopulation in many developing countries. Children are assets to many poor families because they provide labor, usually for farming.
What's needed is not mass exodus to Europe, where they are largely unwelcome, but family planning. The problem must be identified before it can be addressed. Accepting displacements and dangerous voyages, to countries with open borders, will not encourage domestic solutions to the problem of over population.

There has been a new surge of migrant arrivals in Italy in the past week or so, despite the fact that the number of such attempts to cross the Mediterranean by boat usually decreases with the onset of winter.

"Migrants" by definition are those who choose to leave their countries to seek better lives. They are not "asylum seekers" who, by definition, are not safe in their own land.

European officials now propose allowing people to apply for asylum in Europe from abroad, part of a package of measures intended to discourage dangerous, illegal journeys like the one that cost the lives of hundreds of immigrants off the coast of Italy in October. This would allow refugees to go through the asylum-application process from abroad. This option, if implemented, could help thousands of people who might otherwise pay smugglers—and risk their lives on the journey—to seek asylum in Northern European countries that have a good track record of accepting such refugees.

Critics like Amnesty International and the International Red Cross argue, however, that the EU still focuses too much on protecting its borders rather than protecting people and saving lives. They would like to dissolve sovereignties. Lives would be saved if economic migrants weren't rewarded by being accepted so readily for successfully surviving dangerous sea crossings! It fuels the migration.

The effort is to "save lives" rather than dealing with the source of the problem. Overpopulation drives scarcities and conflicts, and drives up the numbers of asylum seekers to present day record numbers, and migrants to get a "better life".

The emphasis should be on genuine asylum seekers, not migrants!