Sibel Edmonds worked for years prior to 9/11 interrogating terrorist suspects in Farsi, Turkish and other Middle-Eastern languages on behalf of the FBI. She learned of the terrorist attacks planned for September 11 2001, but her warnings were ignored by her superiors, with tragic results for 3,000 US residents and even more tragic results for Afghanis, Iraqis, Pakistanis, Libyans, Yemenis, Somalis and Syrians, many hundreds of thousands who have since been killed in wars for which 9/11 was used as both a direct and indirect pretext. After years of waiting for clearance to publish her book from the FBI, she has gone ahead and published as Sibel Edmonds explains in this interview on Russia Today.

I knew there had to an answer to the 9/11 conspiracy theorists that would make the facts clear to non-experts. This is a great 5 minute video. (Also at YouTube).

A search using the terms:
      Republican Primaries
... confirms that Ron Paul's campaign to win the Republican Party preslection for Presidential candidate has been blacked out by the international corporate news media.

Go to youtube.com/watch?v=VMUZIVYuluc to find embedded YouTube Broadcast embedded in this article.

Will Maier and Dr. Zoltanthe ask, "Why is everyone celebrating the 9/11 tenth anniversary?" in their mutant mall Freefall song.

Like Australia, Latvia is (mis)ruled by a government which sends its armed forces to fight illegal wars such as those being fought in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.

See also: NATO and 9/11: Declaration of the Latvian Antiglobalists, Youtube broadcast Against NATO in Libya. NationalState.INFO, Ditta Rietuma (also embedded here).

National Academy of Science member and Distinguished biologist and Professor in Geoscience endorses David Ray Griffin's work exposing the truth of 9/11

Transcript of press conference, Canberra, Tue 24 May 11

Transcript of press conference, Canberra, Tue 31 May 11

Media release on the death of Osama bin Laden, Mon 2 May 11

See also: My submission to the Human Rights Consultation on National Security with links to my submission to the National Human Rights Consultation and the concerning page from which the submission is linked.

An Australian lawyer criticises Australia's participation in war in Afghanistan. Australia's participation in the Afghan war has helped bring world Opium production to record levels, with Afghanistan leading the way. The justification for this war was given in 2001, and remains the justification for the war, which is set to become Australia's longest war, nearly 10 years later. This justification has never been scrutinised by Australia's mainstream newsmedia nor what passes for Australia's 'alternative' or 'far left' media. In this article, that case for war is comprehensively examined.

Contents: Introduction, A Brief History, Carter and Brzezinski, Oil and Gas, The Legality of the Afghanistan War, (What is the Real Reason?: 1. Oil and Gas, 2. Geopolitical Ambitions, 3. Drugs), Conclusion, Footnotes. Article originally published as PDF (180K) on journalof911studies.com.

See also: My submission to the Human Rights Consultation on National Security of 7  Sep 09 by James Sinnamon. Submission is on an 8.2K pdf file and is linked to from the National Security and Terrorism Public Submissions page.

The US government's bin Laden story was so poorly crafted that it did not last 48 hours before being fundamentally altered. Indeed, the new story put out on Tuesday by White House press secretary Jay Carney bears little resemblance to the original Sunday evening story. The fierce firefight did not occur. Osama bin Laden did not hide behind a woman. Indeed, bin Laden, Carney said, "was not armed."by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts Originally Published on Global Research on 4 May 2011.

See also: Bin Laden Home Videos Released ... Why Does the Terrorist Kingpin Look Better Than He Did in 2001? of 7 May 11 on Global Reserch

If today were April 1 and not May 2, we could dismiss as an April fool’s joke this morning’s headline that Osama bin Laden was killed in a firefight in Pakistan and quickly buried at sea. As it is, we must take it as more evidence that the US government has unlimited belief in the gullibility of Americans [and Australians - Editor].- by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts Published on Global Research on 2 May 2011.

On 18 May 2009 a site visitor objected to the controversy surrounding 9/11 being raised on this web-site.

As that site visitor is considered an authority on the question of petroleum and other fossil fuels and is moderator of the Australian Yahoo Group Running on Empty, Oz (roeoz) concerned with Peak Oil, I would have thought he would have been interested to know that many authoritative people don't accept the version of events used to justify the wars that have ravaged much of the oil-rich regions of the world.

Whatever you think about 9 11, this story is so revealing of the contempt our public media and our Primeminister have for public opinion and free expression and for that reason needs to be promoted. (Ed.) The interview by Jon Faine of Kevin Bracken about 9/11 on 20 October 2010 was "possibly the most biased ever heard in Australia on radio broadcast by the tax payer funded Australian Broadcasting Corporation. This attack by Faine of Bracken's questioning the 9/11 events included a torrent of ad hominem slurs and an absolute refusal to discuss any evidence that the events were anything but what we have been told by our governments. Interesting to note that John Faine is now complaining that the ABC has been swamped by 9/11 activists and it may take the ABC many weeks to deal with the massive amount of complaints and comments they have received. Many of these I know to be formal as I have received many courtesy copies of the complaints to the ABC accusing them of breeching their charter and broadcast policy."

John Faine refused to debate Kevin Bracken, a caller to his Melbourne ABC 'talk back' show on the September 11 terrorist atrocity, after which Faine, in seeming league with Labor and Coalition politicians and the corporate newsmedia, whipped up what almost became a national witch-hunt against Bracken. However, they got more than they bargained for when public opinion swang behind Kevin Bracken. We have transcribed in full, with comments, one of Faine's videoed "defences" of his conduct, so that readers can judge for themselves.

See also comment Jon Faine baits, refuses to debate, Kevin Bracken, Gillard, Faine, disdainful of reasonable doubt on 9/11

As of 10:00AM this morning a Herald sun poll is showing that over 60% of respondents agree with Union leader Kevin Bracken's view that the official explanation of 9/11 does not stand up to scientific scrutiny.

Republished from 911oz.com. See also: comments Jon Faine baits, refuses to debate, Kevin Bracken and Gillard, Faine, disdainful of reasonable doubt on 9/11, 'Anti-racists' silence on the most racist lie of all

Update, 31 October: A more recent figure of support for Kevin Bracken on the abovementioned poll is 76.78%, or 8277 votes to 2501 votes) so those, who agree with Jon Faine that discussion of the controversy raging over 9/11 should be suppressed must be, as they should be in any free and educated society, a small minority .

How could Martin Bryant, whose IQ of 66 placed him amongst the bottom 1 or 2% of the Australian population, have performed the deadly feats of marksmanship at Port Arthur on 28 April 1996 that few fully trained soldiers are capable of? (Includes embedded YouTube videos "Aussie 9/11 'Port Arthur massacre'", "Port Arthur massacre - Martin Bryant set up, part 1 of 2", "Port Arthur massacre - Martin Bryant set up, part 2 of 2".) See also: "The Port Arther Massacre - Was Martin Bryant Framed? parts 1, 2 & 3 (pdf 100K, 111K & 126K) by Carl Wernerhoff in Nexus₁ magazine of Jun-Jul 06, "Schapelle Corby is innocent, and the Australian Government knows she is" of 6 Sep 09.

Paul Craig Roberts, whose distinguished journalistic career, includes 15 years as an associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has been banned, so far, for six years from the US mainstream media, because he questions the myths used to justify US domestic and international policy - that offshoring of jobs and high immigration will bring prosperity to the US and the official account of 9/11. Originally published on Information Clearing House on 24 Mar 10.

In the last three months of 2009 a discussion on Larvatus Prodeo, about the controversy surrounding 9/11, turned into the online equivalent of a lynching. On 28 December at the point at which the intended victim (myself) was able to turn the tables on his tormentors, the moderators abruptly closed the disccussion. I have been barred from contributing to that site ever since, as if I had been blamed for the abuses of others.

Originally published on 29 Dec 09. Updated 2 Mar 10 to include as appendices, excerpts from the forum discusion and correspondence between myself and the LP moderators. Original forum here (html file, 5.6Mb).
Update (3 Mar): Larvatus Prodeo moderator tells me she is "comfortable with how [she's] represented," but I am still waiting to be advised if I have been intentionally banned and why. See Appendix 3.

Update, 18 April 2010: A comment of mine has finally appeared again on Larvatus Prodeo. See inside, at the start of article, for further information.

In November last year, Richard Gage, who represents 1059 qualified architects and engineers, who are calling for a new investigation of the 'collapses' of the three World Trade Center buildings on 11 September 2001, toured Australia. During the tour, he met and interviewed one of the architects he represents, Jan Utzon, son of the late Jørn Utzon, who designed Australia's iconic Sydney Opera House.

Originally published as "Jan Utzon A Compassionate Architect Who Cares About the Truth"on ae911truth.org on 23 Feb 10. See also: "Why Prime Minister Kevin Rudd should take another look at the 'image of the twin towers coming down'" of 30 Dec 09, "Utzon's son signs up for September 11 conspiracy theory" in the SMH of 25 Nov 09, "Science Show too quick to close discussion of World Trade Center collapses" of 24 Dec 08.

Patty Casazza, Kristen Breitweiser, Mindy Kleinberg and Lorie Van Auken lost their husbands in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. To learn why their husbands died and how a recurrence could be prevented, they forced the Bush adminisration to hold the 9/11 Commission. More than 8 years after 9/11, they have learnt, to their dismay, that all the same excuses for the intelligence failures which led to 9/11 are being made again today in regard to the attempted terrorist attack of 25 December 2009 (12/25). As a consequence, air travellers may soon face further impositions, including health-threatening full body scans whilst those, whose incompetence put air travellers' lives at risk, go unpunished again.

Also published on 911blogger.com as "Statement of September 11th advocates in response to 12/25 terror attempt". See also: YouTube video of CNN interview of witnesses to well dressed people helping terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab aboard Flight 253 at Amsterdam Airport (also embedded as Appendix to article), "Flight 253: Anatomy of a Cover-Up" of 11 Jan 10 by Tom Burghardt on dissidentvoice.org (also published on 911blogger.com), "'Conspiracy or cock up?' White House reaction to ersatz bomber" of 8 jan 10 by Michael Collins on dailycensored.com (also published on agonist.org and 911blogger.com), "The Strange Case of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab" of 4 Jan 10 by Tom Burghardt on dissidentvoice.com (also published on 911blogger.com), "Airport Droids Attack Human Gene Pool" about the health risks posed by full body scanners of 29 Dec 09 on peaksurfer.blogspot.com (also published on culturechange.org), "DNA Full-body scanners used on air passengers may damage human DNA" of 11 Jan 10 on naturalnews.com, Passenger profiling at airports is unavoidable" in the Australian of 7 Jan 10.

What's on: Free Screening of 9/11 Press for Truth about the Jersey Girls' struggle against the cover-up of 9/11. Where: Brisbane City Council Central Library(266 George St); When: 1PM Saturday, 16 January.

On 26 March 2009 Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd told how the image of the World Trade Center Twin Towers coming down, which he "[could not] remove from [his] mind," made necessary the continuation of Australia's increasingly unpopular intervention in the Afghan war. Perhaps it is time that Kevin Rudd took a proper look at those images so that he could learn what really happened on 11 September 2001.

Article, including embedded video, has been adapted from material found in story "Cutter Charges in the North Tower of the World Trade Center" of 26 Dec 09 on 911blogger.com. See also: ae911truth.org, "WTC7 in Freefall", "'WTC7: NIST Admits Freefall' ...The Movie", parts 1, 2 and 3.

What kind of peace proponent would use the occasion of his acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize to peddle the lie that war is an integral part of human history?

Also published on Global Research and rickrozoff.wordpress.com.

On Monday, the 30th of November, Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, gave his final presentation in New Zealand on the Hard Evidence Down Under Tour, to an audience of 143 in Auckland, at the Trades Hall in Grey Lynn.

Originally published on clareswinney.wordpress.com. See also "Utzon's son signs up for September 11 conspiracy theory" in the Sydney Morning Herald of 25 Nov 09 about how Jan Utzon, son of the late Joern Utzon, designer of the Sydney Opera House, is a member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Architect and internationally acclaimed speaker Richard Gage will present startling new evidence about the September 11, 2001 collapses of the World Trade Centre when he speaks in In Sydney. Melbourne, Brisbane and Wellington this month.

See Richard Gage and Dr. Steven Jones at The Hard Evidence, Down Under Tour. Tour dates: Sydney: Sat-Sun 14-15 Nov, Melbourne: Tue 17 Nov, Brisbane: Thu 19 Nov, Wellington, NZ, Sat 21 Nov. See thehardevidence.com for further information.

See also: ae911truth.org, Richard Gage addresses sell-out crowd at Commonwealth Club

Bonnaud and Gattegno did not succeed in silencing Bigard and Kassovitz on this : Why was Harrit, the scientist who had written the article that the ‘Truthers’ cite on thermite, not invited? It is true that if the co-author – Steven E. Jones – of the paper on thermite has written an article defending the idea that Jesus had appeared in America, that is disquieting.[2] Nonetheless, referring to the article on Jesus is not the way to respond to the scientific argument. A man may believe in fairies, but if he advances a scientific theory, then his theory needs to be criticized and analysed on the basis of the science it relies on; it isn’t valid to refute it by changing the subject to fairies. French version

Bonnaud et Gattegno ne réussirent pas, quand même, à faire taire Bigard et Kassovitz sur ce fait : Pourquoi n’a-t-on pas fait venir Harrit, le scientifique qui a écrit l’article que tous les ‘Truthers’ citent sur la thermite ? Il est vrai que si le co-auteur – Steven E. Jones - du papier sur la thermite a écrit des articles défendant l’idée que Jésus a paru en Amérique, c’est déconcertant.[1] Néanmoins, ce n’est pas une façon de répondre a l’argument scientifique. Un homme peut croire aux fées, mais s’il avance une théorie scientifique il faut analyser et critiquer sa théorie sur la science qu’elle se pose dessus, et non pas essayer de la réfuter en changeant le sujet aux fées. Les Etats-Unis sont bourrés d’adeptes des religions des plus farfelus mais bourrés aussi de grandes œuvres technologiques.

English version: "French comic J-M Bigard and Mattieu Kassovitz challenge Official 9/11 story on French Television".

Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, whose membership currently includes 910 architectural and engineering professionals all demanding a new inquiry into the 'collapses' of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and Building 7 on 11 September 2001, gave a presentation to a sellout crowd at the San Francisco Commonwealth Club on on Tuesday, 8 September. Of twenty-one people present who believed that fire alone brought down the buildings, only two held on to that belief at the end of the presentation.

Coming up: See Richard Gage and Dr. Steven Jones at The Hard Evidence, Down Under Tour. Tour dates: Sydney: Sat-Sun 14-15 Nov, Melbourne: Tue 17 Nov, Brisbane: Thu 19 Nov, Wellington, NZ, Sat 21 Nov. See thehardevidence.com for further information.

This article is an excerpt from "AE911Truth: From the Golden Gate to Ground Zero for the 8th Anniversary of 9/11" of 3 Sep 09.
See also: ae911truth.org, stj911.org,911truth.org, truthaction.org.au.

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, has told Italy's oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies.

An International Conference to be held in Sydney will critically examine the three building Collapses in New York on 11 September 2001. The official explanation of the 'collapses' of buildings 1, 2 and 7 of the World Trade Center Complex have been attributed primarily to fire damage causing a "global collapse", which independent scientific research has found an entirely insufficient explanation. A group of Architects and Engineers, approaching one thousand members, is demanding a new investigation of these building collapses based on hard physical evidence, witness testimony, video evidence and strict structural analysis using the original blueprints.

See also: thehardevidence.com, ae911truth.org, stj911.org,911truth.org, truthaction.org.au.

Hard Evidence Down Under Tour Dates: Sydney: Sat-Sun 14-15 Nov, Melbourne: Tue 17 Nov, Brisbane: Thu 19 Nov, Wellington, NZ, Sat 21 Nov.

Paul Craig Roberts explains how the 9/11 Truth Movement faces enormous difficulty having many ordinary Americans accept the overwhelming evidence that disproves the official account of 9/11.

Originally published on Information Clearing House on 15 Sep 09. ICH needs your support. Please donate.

AUSTIN, Texas Sept. 11 /PRNewswire/ -- Appearing on The Alex Jones Show today to discuss his video address to Barack Obama, Charlie Sheen has challenged those who have publicly attacked him for speaking out on 9/11, particularly Meghan McCain, Rush Limbaugh Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly, to debate him on CNN's Larry King Live.

Published at Reuters. Also published on 911blogger.com.
See also: "Sheen Blasts Cowardly Corporate Media Refusal to Debate 9/11 Facts" on Prison Planet of 15 Sep 09, "Twenty Minutes With The President" on Prison Planet, Charlie Sheen talks to Alex Jones - 9/11/09 on 911oz.com.