The full Griffith field, in order of appearance on the ballot:
|
Young, plugged-in, family oriented
Timothy has strong interests in solving environmental and societal problems through systems thinking and stewardship of nature. He is keen to assist in raising public awareness of the sustainability equation, of which population is a crucial component. Recently married and looking to the future, Timothy is concerned about overdevelopment, housing affordability and cost of living for all citizens. He is 23 and encourages everyone to think "out of the box" to see the deeper solutions to global problems caused by unsustainable, exponential growth. Timothy, a software developer, is currently working as a games programmer and web designer in Taringa, Brisbane. He enjoys gardening and is an aspiring permaculturalist and cultivator-mycologist, while also being interested in philosophy, ethics, art and reading.
Would you like to help Timothy's campaign? contact the Stable Population Party
A weary uncritical mob of narrow focus
The other candidates in this election seem to be scraping to find anything to talk about, as they ignore the population elephant in the room. Indeed, they appear to be universally blinkered to the real problems of environment and population. This is bizarre since it was only recently that Queenslanders perished in massive floods due to persistent building on flood planes, mandated and encouraged by planners and politician, including Campbell Newman and Anna Bligh, who should have been tried for their responsibility in this. Brisbane itself was underwater for several hours.
6 reasons to stabilise Australia's population:
- Relieve overstretched infrastructure including hospitals, schools, roads and public transport
- Ease cost of living pressures including housing, energy, water and transport
- Protect our environment including food, water & energy resources, native bushland and animal habitats
- Promote education and training to increase job opportunities for all Australians
- Minimise overdevelopment including high-rise and sprawl
- Create a more resilient economy to sustain and enhance prosperity
Population is not a single issue, it is the everything issue.
National research confirms that over 70 percent of Australians reject the Liberal / National / Labor / Greens 'big Australia' policy outcome of around 40m (and rapidly rising) by 2050 . Yet until now we've had no choice. Powerful business lobby groups are pushing for this rapid population growth, in order to secure both cheap (including pre-trained) labour and more customers.
Comments
Geoffrey Taylor
Sun, 2014-01-19 17:50
Permalink
If population "the everything issue," why no mention of peace?
If, as Timothy claims, "Population ... is the everything issue", why has he not mentioned peace? In the last two decades, hundreds of thousands have died in criminal wars of aggression by the United States, Israel and their allies, a number of which Australia has directly participated in. These include:
Almost continuously since the end of the Second World War, bloody wars have been fought in different corners of the globe. President Kennedy heroically tried to establish world peace, and on no less than three occasions, over-ruled the wishes of his Generals to start global nuclear war. For that he was murdered on 22 November 1963.
No candidate standing for Federal parliament, particularly in the seat of a person who helped bring about so much carnage and destruction as did former Foreign Minister and former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd did, should fail to take a stand against war.
Anonymous (not verified)
Sun, 2014-01-19 18:40
Permalink
Greed for power is also allied to population
William (not verified)
Mon, 2014-01-20 15:30
Permalink
Overpopulation drives war
Peter Strachan (not verified)
Sun, 2014-01-19 18:43
Permalink
World Peace & Overpopulation
Timothy Lawrence (not verified)
Sun, 2014-01-19 18:44
Permalink
Sustainable Population Party and Peace
Geoffrey Taylor
Tue, 2014-01-21 00:17
Permalink
Sustainable Population Party the best choice for Griffith voters
Thank you for your response, Timothy. It is reassuring to know that you have taken a stance in support of peace in this war-ravaged planet. Given that you are the only candidate so far known to me to have taken the right stance on these two most critical issues, you are clearly the most relevant candidate as Sheila has pointed out above. (However, it seems, that two other candidates, whilst ignoring these critical concerns, have some merit – see below.)
You wrote:
Whilst I can see it would not be advisable to campaign on too many issues, I see no reason, why other policies that a candidate supports can't be put on the record where sufficiently interested people can find them.
Second and third preferences
Even though none of the other candidates have (yet) taken a stance on these two critical issues, some are promoting policies which I think are also laudible. Voters giving you their first preference should consider giving their second and third preferences to:
Karen Boele's electonic direct democracy seeems to be like Swiss Direct Democracy that has been previously promoted on candobetter.
Whilst I think that voters should give their third prefence to the Pirate Party, their web-site does them no credit. It's home page consists only of a membership application form. The only other content consists of the #4.2.1Pirate Party"> constitution. There is no material which explains the policies of the Pirate Party, nor news nor discussion forums.
Nonetheless, the Pirate Party's principle policy is opposition to the scam of proprietary copyright software such as Micro$oft Windows. The Windows Operating System has been used by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) to spy on its citizens and the citizens of allied countries by transmitting data from their computers' hard disk drives straight across the Internet to the NSA's storage systems.
For her opposition to proprietary software such as Micro$oft, Melanie Thomas should be put high in voters' preference allocations.
End economic neoliberalism
Another policy which should be raised with electors is the mad doctrine of neoliberalism first imposed upon Australia in 1983 by then Federal Treasurer Paul Keating. This doctrine dictates that only supposedly more efficient private enterprises driven by the profit motive, can own and operate services upon which Australian citizens depend – banking, telecommunications, transport, electricity generation, insurance, etc.
This doctrine has led to a succession of Australian Federal and state Govenments, never with any electoral mandate (with the arguable exception of Victorian Premier Jeff Kennet in the 1990's) flogging off to private profiteers the people's assets.
The doctrine of economic neoliberalism was codified in the 1993 Hilmer Report (pdf, 132k).
We are long past the time when this policy should be scrapped by Australian governments at all levels.
Any small party or independent candidate who campaigns energetically, and is known, at least by informed voters, to support all the above policies, should stand a good chance of getting a primary vote substantially more than what such candidates have become accustomed to.
Whilst this may not be sufficient to defeat the major party candidates, given the vast resources at the hands of the major parties and the media bias against decent candidates, this could improve the prospects of you and other good small party and independent candidates winning seats outright in subsequent federal, state or local elections in coming years.
Anonymous (not verified)
Tue, 2014-01-21 17:31
Permalink
Foreigners could jump queue in Queensland immigration plan
IMMIGRANTS and refugees could have their visas fast-tracked if they agree to live in regional Queensland.
The state could even up its intake under the proposal designed to alleviate pressure on the booming southeast.
If they really wanted to release population pressure, there needs to be a call to slow down immigration, not assume that the immigrants will actually stay in regional Queensland in the long term.
Townsville, Rockhampton and Cairns have been earmarked for areas of future migrant growth, but only if the federal government commits to invest in more regional infrastructure. Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, a corporate lobby group, and Citibank have stated that Australia's ''infrastructure deficit'' is about $700 billion.
Townsville mayor Jenny Hill warns that without job opportunities, the proposal could encourage ghettos.
Foreigners could jump queue in Qld plan, 20 Jan 2014 at http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/immigrants-could-jump-queue-under-qld-plan/story-e6frfku9-1226805824004
About 100,000 overseas immigrants move to Queensland each year. The unemployment rate in the state lifted to 6.4 per cent in June, its highest level since October 2003 and up from 5.9 per cent in May. Only Tasmania has a worse unemployment rate at 8.9 per cent.
State deputy opposition leader Tim Mulherin said the unemployment figures were an "indictment on the Newman government's economic management".
Australian citizenship is being fast-tracked for bogus "economic growth", but with the engine-room of our economy flagging - i.e. job creation - the hopeful migrants will be isolated and impoverished.
Editorial comment: More propaganda from the Courier Mail:
The articles were posted yesterday (Monday) or today (Tuesday) to promote decentralisation as a 'solution' to the overcrowding of South East Queensland caused by the Brisbane City Council and various Queensland state governments for at least the last two decades. The Editorial was published on Monday 20 January and the on Tuesday 21 February. I am not prepared to give Rupert Murdoch's newspaper my personal details in order to be able to eead that article again to ascertain the publication dates and to read (I think) 5 free 'news' articles per day. I certainly have no intention of giving money to News Corporation to be further misinformed. – Ed
nimby
Wed, 2014-01-22 08:36
Permalink
Infrastructure needed first
Geoffrey Taylor
Wed, 2014-01-22 10:57
Permalink
Kelvin Thomson: solution to tran-Tasman immigration problem
Give Kiwis easier dole but limit migration, says federal MP Kelvin Thomson
Labor MP Kelvin Thomson said there would have to be an annual limit on Kiwi migration, otherwise Australia would face a huge influx of jobless people.
More than 600,000 Kiwis, or about 10 per cent of the NZ population, live permanently here. Some 300,000 barred from accessing welfare.
Mr Thomson said that Kiwis should be given permanent residence and welfare entitlements, but only if the trans-Tasman migration agreement was changed to cap annual numbers at between 30,000 to 40,000 people. He said that his solution was fair because NZ citizens would have more security here and Australia would regain control of its migration program.
Monash University population expert Dr Bob Birrell agreed.
Add comment