You are here

New Year's Resolve From Our Political Leaders - Griffith By-Election Opportunity

New Year’s Resolve from our political leaders. Are they out of touch with reality?…………See comments in Bold

Australians should enter 2014 full of optimism and willing to have a go to better their country, Prime Minister Tony Abbott says. He says the strength of the country is in its people's willingness to better their lives. 'This is the year I hope more of us than ever will have a go', he says in a new year's message.

No problem there. 1.8% more every year is what Liberal, Labor and Greens are ensuring using a policy "by stealth; without consensus". Does the additional cost of supporting those additional people exceed the ability of economic growth to pay for it? Will we "have an indebted go" while our economy tanks according to Tony Abbott? Where's the due diligence to back up the strategy of extreme population growth?

'We'll start new businesses, we'll build new houses, we'll undertake further study, make investments and plan a future.
'May we all be nearer to our best selves in 2014, government included.'

Using debt, debt, debt and more debt?

In 2014 the country will start commemorating the centenary of Anzac - which falls in 2015 - and begin a conversation about a referendum to recognise indigenous people in the constitution.

Why recognise indigenous people if we don't also recognise, and show respect for, their sustainable population management policy which lasted over 50,000 years before we dispossessed them using extreme population growth? Isn't that dispossession still evolving at maximum speed?

Opposition Leader Bill Shorten said he and Labor would spend the next year fighting for Australians' jobs and making sure the government sticks to its election promises.

I note from the Vote Compass data that Bill wants population growth to exceed 2012’s 1.8% per annum. Yet the ABS reports that unemployment has been increasing by an average of 2.3% per annum for the last decade. Great idea Bill; but how does this work? To be fair, looking at the changes from one year to the next can be misleading. People reach retirement age, economic activity rises and falls, etc.... So looking at a decade gives a longer term average. In the last decade, two of the largest two-year leaps in unemployment occurred in December 2009 (165,500) and December 2013 (92,100). Over those two year periods migration was about 585,000 and 387,000 respectively. The ratios of leap in unemployment to migrant arrivals were roughly 28% and 24% respectively. They look similar don't they? This is roughly one in four, which is an average family of four with one wage earner becoming unemployed for every family of four arriving. The trend in the total number of unemployed fluctuates, but is always upwards. Stating unemployment as a percentage is political manipulation, because it doesn't quantify the magnitude of the humanitarian problem. Has the government ever evaluated the relationship between migrant arrivals prior to economic slowdowns and the step changes in unemployment that follows? Is this a new Key Performance Indicator relevant to population growth management? Don't ask me; ask Tony Abbott and Bill Shorten !!

Australia will be rewarded by its resilience, hard work and the creativity of its people in the new year, opposition leader Bill Shorten says.

Does resilience mean pumping up the economy with rapid population growth so it booms forever and never busts? Is that why we had high interest rates driven by a surge in demand while the rest of the world dropped interest rates during the GFC? Did that contribute to making our dollar high and our manufacturing industry uncompetitive? Great idea Bill; but how does this work?

He says keeping people in work will be among the biggest challenges the country faces in 2014.

OK; got that.

'For all of us, the new year presents a renewed opportunity to focus on the things that really matter - our families, our community and our nation's future,' he said in a statement.

'The kind of job losses that occurred towards the end of 2013 can't be allowed to happen again this year.'

They’ve been happening for a decade, Bill. Isn’t 2.3% the averaged increase in unemployment per annum, compounding from 2003 to 2013, a decade? We have 26% more seasonally adjusted unemployed than a decade ago. The trend is up; and the yearly fluctuations will continue.

To confront these challenges the nation's resolve must be durable and unwavering, he said.

What does that mean? Unwavering denial of the unsustainability of extreme population growth regardless of consequences? A durable, unwavering policy "by stealth; without consensus"?

'We must continue to fight for the fair go and ensure every Australian has the opportunity to reach their full potential - through education, proper health care or a hand when they need it most,' he said.

A fair go for who, exactly? How? By refusing to perform a comparative analysis of the social, environmental, economic and humanitarian consequences (both domestic and international) of a range of Australian long term population growth rates; using zero population growth as the Base Case benchmark?

'No matter what is ahead of us, I know our nation will continue to be rewarded by the resilience, hard work and creativity of its people.

……..and the short term, unsustainable policies of our pro-growth dictatorship in collaboration with the Liberals and the Greens?

Please sign and forward this petition if you think these guys have lost the plot:

If you're in the electorate of Griffith, consider voting for the Sustainable Population Party so they can "have a go" representing over 50% of the population who reckon this issue needs to be addressed.

Image icon Lucky Strike.jpg907.41 KB
Office presentation icon Growthies10.ppt834 KB
Office presentation icon Growthies11 Menthol.ppt839 KB
Image icon bill-shorten.jpg4.66 KB
Image icon t-abbott.jpg3.53 KB


Given that there is one party that intends to do all it can to rectify the situation described above and it is first on the ticket, it will be intersting to see how the Sustainable Population Party goes today.

So far, SPP has 577 votes, an increase of +0.7%. The mainstream parties gained overwhelming support, and Terri Butler (ALP) is on track to maintain the Griffith seat. It seems the electorate are dug in at the heels and can't see beyond the main parties!
It's not that population isn't a major issue, but the effects are subtle and incremental, so it's become a background to our lives, and the costs of living and squeeze on our cities.

Few people think deeply about cause and effect, or associate events to causes. A software engineer would be well suited to being a candidate for SPP, with analysis and understanding of logic, inputs, mechanisms and outputs. He wouldn't be distracted by social engineering and political machinery based on economics and meta-data.

It also questions how seriously do voters really question the parties, and candidates. They seem to be locked into tradition and voting for the biggest "winners" rather than spend time thinking about the issues. It's on the level of football - teams, colours, personalities, loyalties and "winners"!

Well done SPP and Tim Lawrence.

The public are reliant on the 'education' they get from the ABC and the commercial media. Those media hardly mentioned the Sustainable Population Party and they suppress useful discussion of the problems of population growth whilst pushing the idea that growth is irresistible and must be accommodated. Australian voters are treated by the press rather like Saudi women, taught that they cannot think for themselves and can change nothing and must be subservient to those deemed to have authority.

Our mainstream media and government are ideologically corrupt to the bone.

The candidate, by the way, was a software engineer. I tried to publicise him by doing a film, but to win an election you need thousands of people to publicise you, and to spend years door-knocking and currying favour.

If the film I had done of Tim Diamond Lawrence had been aired on the news on every channel, and there had been newspaper articles day after day mentioning how he does his hair and what he said about football, he would have had a chance.

That's no reason to give up; every reason to keep trying, harder and harder. Ecologically sustainable population advocates have to take themselves and the battle seriously; the growth lobby does.