"..70% of Australians prefer a smaller population. They don't want a 'Big Australia' by 2050, and, none of the major parties are listening. So we're here to give the majority of Australians the choice that they want. [...] We're about the people, the citizens of Australia, who deserve a choice." Timothy Diamond Lawence, Griffith candidate.Timothy Diamond Lawrence, Sustainable Population Party candidate for Griffith by-election on Saturday 8 February 2014. The seat of Griffith is in Brisbane, Kevin Rudd's old electorate. Now Rudd has resigned, there is a by-election. Brisbane and Queensland are the focus of unsustainable population growth; Education, roads, housing cannot keep up and the beautiful environment is being destroyed. Land and housing prices, energy and vital resources prices are all inflating due to population pressure. Homelessness, debt, despair increasing, along with unemployment. Labor and the LibNationals are equally guilty in this, having actively orchestrated overpopulation to please big business. The Greens won't touch the issue. Only the Sustainable Population Party (previously Stable Population Party) is showing courage to represent peoples' democratic wishes here. For this reason I am publicising Tim Diamond Lawrence.
For a recent earlier article on Mr Lawrence and the Sustainable Population Party, click here.
Comments
PostGrowthEra
Thu, 2014-01-30 12:13
Permalink
Immigration out of control
Such is the volume of immigration coming to Australia, it's open wide to scams and corruption. It's a whole revenue making industry for the Australian Government.
Experts say the system is being swamped by the popular route of partner visas for permanent residency.
In some countries, marriage itself is an industry. For a great majority of recently arrived migrants from Asia, India, China, Vietnam, when they're looking for a spouse they go back home. According to demographer Bob Birrell, "partner visas do require an assessment after two years, to establish whether or not the relationship is genuine and continuing, but hardly any of such assessments turn up a negative. And I think that's largely because the department is just simply swamped."
Partner visas for married and de-facto relationships make up about 77 per cent of family migration.
Of the 1053 cancellations:
SBS:scams uncovered amid crackdown on partner visa fraud
Anonymous (not verified)
Fri, 2014-01-31 07:47
Permalink
Order Of The Toad 2014
AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY-:
Whatever will benefit Australia - that we are for;
whatever will harm Australia - that we are against. William Lane
PRESS RELEASE
Recipients Of The Prime Native Australian Australia Day Award 2014Announced
THE ORDER OF THE TOAD
Robert J Hawke
For excelling as a Quisling for Chinese imperialists to secure
the purchase and control of Australian Assets.
Campbell Newman
For colluding to violate the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
by purporting to criminalise freedom of association.
Quentin Bryce
For excelling in the low grade status of the political caste
through the promotion of degeneracy.
Robert Carr
For Foreign Aid allocation to Asia Pacific Nations exacerbating
population chaos to the detriment of Australia.
Australia First Party
Identity - Freedom - Independence
P O Box 223 Croydon 3136. National Contact Line 02 8587 0014 www.australiafirst.net
email: [email protected]
Australia First Party - Reclaiming Australia for Australians
The Protocol for The Order Of The Toad
SALUTATION
In addressing a recipient of this Native Australian Award, "Toad"
replaces the common usage of Mr/Mrs, or any other norm of address,
such as those relating to profession, status, position or office.
The salutation "Toad" should be used in both verbal and written
communication as an acknowledgement of the personage of the
recipient.
Toad Award salutation surpasses accreditation attributes of any other
Australian award.
In personal conversation, when addressing a recipient as "Toad", the
inclusion of a Christian or first name in the appellation is not required.
"Toad" is consummate.
In a personal greeting, particularly when in company, the addressing of
an award holder with the salutation "Toad", should be as a loud
voiced shout, as a full acknowledgement and recognition of the
character of the recipient.
In written communication, it is not considered appropriate to use the
letters OT [Order of the Toad], following the name of a person issued
the award, This is a norm for certain bourgeois awards, but for
Toads, such is considered likely to decrease community regard for
same, and is therefore unsuitable. "Toad" at the start of the
appellation address fully completes the protocol requirement.
The appellation "Toad" continues in usage not only whilst the
recipient remains on our Native Soil, but also elsewhere. after either
voluntary departure, or deportation under an Australia First Citizens’
Community Order. It is a lifelong accolade.
Olaf (not verified)
Fri, 2014-01-31 11:17
Permalink
Meeting Victoria First TOMORROW 1:45p (Saturday 1/2/14) Fitzroy
nimby
Thu, 2014-02-06 14:27
Permalink
Chinese property developers grabbing "bargain" housing
Dennis K (not verified)
Thu, 2014-02-06 21:48
Permalink
Immigration policy must be Politically Correct
Almost everyone who wants immigration reduced, seems to also object greatly to immigration reduction based on race/culture/religion.
For this reason, I can't see mainstream population control parties being very successful, or at least, keeping any victory. More likely, a far right organisation will take the ball and run with it. People who want immigration control in Britain, often vote BNP, even though they don't like the BNP's nationalism.
It's not that I want it to be that way, but that logically, having some criteria for assessing immigration as valid and good, and some as invalid and not to be touched, is less logically congruous than simply saying that any criteria a nation needs to assess immigration is A-OK.
This is the simplicity of not having to be Politically Correct, you don't have to justify why some criteria are OK to enforce and others evil.
Carlos Arredondo - Boston Hero or NWO FRAUD?
Greg (not verified)
Tue, 2014-02-11 11:07
Permalink
Not that complicated, unless we allow it to seem so
immigration watch (not verified)
Fri, 2014-02-07 14:33
Permalink
Population is THE key issue
According to the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH):
Bill Glasson heckled at Griffith by-election forum far as political gimmicks go, it was hard to look past Stable Population Party candidate Timothy Lawrence, who offered free condoms to all in attendance.
The comedic approach highlighted the serious platform on which the party is based – controlling Australia's population so it does not exceed 26 million by reducing immigration and phasing out government birth payments to families at two children.
“Under tripartisan policies, Australia's population is currently growing by over 1000 people a day,” he said.
“That's a new Gold Coast every 18 months.”
Clearly, population is really THE issue! It's assumed that population growth is an indication of consumer confidence in the economy - whereas it's largely a political choice.
The Liberal National Party candidate, who left before the questions from the floor due to another commitment, faced an at times hostile audience in the the Labor/Green heartland of Griffith. The tide may be turning against the government?
Add comment