Comments

An animal rights group, ASK, has accused army personnel of inhumanely culling kangaroos at the Puckapunyal Army Base in central Victoria. They say that a cull of up to 18,000 kangaroos started on last Friday night.

Australia's attitude towards its native animals is abysmal. They are labelled as "pests", "plagues", environmental destroyers and are harassed and hounded as if they didn't belong here!

They accuse the Australian Defence Forces (ADF) of not following protocols, and are allowing joeys to stay in the pouches of dead mothers, and the kangaroos aren't being shot properly. A spokesman for the Department of Defence says it has engaged specialist contractors to conduct the cull in compliance with the national code of practice, and not their own personnel doing the job.

This carnage is a disgrace, and we expect our defence force to exhibit the highest moral and ethical standards - not descend to criminal killers of defenceless kangaroos.

See also : Humane kangaroo culling program at Puckapunyal begins — Australian Government Department of Defence media release of 20 May 2013, Army base blamed as kangaroo cull soars by Melissa Fyfe in the Age of 2 Nov 2012, Claims military base exceeded kangaroo cull quota in the McIvor Times of 29 Feb 2012, Population Dynamics and Animal Welfare: Issues Raised by the Culling of Kangaroos in Puckapunyal (behind paywall) in the Springer Link of Oct 2006, Protest Friday 25th July, 2003 — Puckapunyal Army Base-Plight Of Kangaroos on the Australian Wildlife Protection Council web-site of 9 Jul 2003, Kangaroos starving at Puckapunyal army base on ABC Radio's The World Today of 26 June 2003, $1.8m to shoot Army base kangaroos by Fia Cumming in the SMH of 6 Oct 2002, Army warning over kangaroo cull in the CNN of 20 May 2002, Shooters to cull 15,000 kangaroos in the News 24 archives of 17 May 2002.

Sheila Newman asks:

Does it follow from what, Geoffrey?
Which comment are you answering please?

My comment was a response to your comment immediately above it and not to your more measured and thoughtful comment that preceded that comment.

That the government of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad funded family planning clinics, as your earlier comment notes, seems to indicate that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who was defeated at the Presidential elections of 14 June 2013, was a more progressive and enlightened leader than the new president, Hassan Rouhani.

However, regardless of the merits or otherwise of its family planning policies, Iran, unlike Australia, remains opposed to the New World Order (NWO).

Through the waging of wars against countries in the Middle East and Central Asia since 1990 and the imposition of sanctions, the NWO has caused many hundreds of thousands of deaths and terrible material destruction. Citizens of many other countries around the globe, even where they have, so far, been spared the carnage of war, have been made to endure economic devastation through disaster capitalism at the hands of the NWO as described in The Shock Doctrine of 2007 by Naomi Klein.

Even if both Australia and Iran now both pursue harmful policies aimed at population growth, their mutually contrary policies towards the NWO remains an important distinction between the two.

The real concern about the Socialist Alliance and all the other "far left" groups of which I am aware, is that, whilst seeming to support the objectives of the campaign, they will, as they have done time and time again, find ways to make the campaign ineffective and not able to attract the broader support that this campaign should be able to attract. A better way for genuine independent activists to counteract this would be to attend the rally and try to get as many other like-minded people, who genuinely want public transport and want to save Royal Park, to attend, Such people should be able to link up and work more effectively regardless of the presence, or otherwise of members of the Socialist Alliance.

Media Release 14th December 2013 Save Sydney’s Last Wild Emu population Public Meeting organised – Politicians invited to front upset locals A public meeting has been organised due to widespread community anger at the news the NSW Government is allowing Sydney’s last wild Emu population to be removed. The fight is on to save Sydney’s Emus. 5.30pm Thursday the 19th Dec. Jim Anderson Park, Greenbank Drive, Werrington Downs. Robyn Parker, Stuart Ayres, Bart Bassett, Penrith Councillors, NSW Opposition and Greens were invited “We’ve organised this public meeting to give locals a chance to express their anger at the NSW Government about their treacherous decision to allow the removal of Sydney’s last wild Emu population said Geoff Brown” “The NSW Government needs to unshackle itself from Lend Lease and reverse this appalling decision. The fight to save the 1535 ha ADI Site was also a fight to retain our Emus and Kangaroos. We may not have stopped the housing but we got a 900 ha reserve saved and were promised by government the Emus would be retained in that reserve. This decision by Robyn Parker on behalf of the O’Farrell Government is an act of treachery. They have betrayed the people of Western Sydney that put them in government.” “Robyn Parker and Stuart Ayres the Minister assisting the Premier on Western Sydney, Bart Bassett the local member for Londonderry and all the Penrith Councillors have been invited to front the public. They need to answer why the Emus need to go due to Lend Leases mismanagement. Why is Lend Lease even managing the proposed 900 ha Regional Park when in 2001 we were promised it would be owned and managed by the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service? This whole blame the vandals and Emus line is just a smoke screen for a major stuff up by Robyn Parkers Department and Lend Lease.” “If we are to save Sydney’s last wild Emus then the public needs to get very vocal and turn up in force to this public meeting. We must let the NSW Government know loud and clear that we love our Emus and we want them to stay.” Ends Comments Geoff Brown co – organiser, local resident, President Western Sydney Conservation Alliance and former convenor ADI Residents Action Group 0431 222602 Petition to Robyn Parker (which shows public comments) and more info see www.wsca.org.au To the Sydney media: please contemplate the significance of this decision and report the loss of our last Emus. Western Sydney issues deserve a voice. Backgrounder The Emu population existing on the 1535 ha former Australian Defence Industries site at St Marys/Penrith may be removed over the Christmas period by developer Lend Lease which has been granted a licence to remove them by Robyn Parker the NSW Environment Minister. The Emu population has existed on the old munitions factory site since the 1950’s. It was common place for defence bases to place the Coat of Arms, Kangaroos and Emus, on their properties. The Emus are much loved icons of the Penrith region. Lend Lease has written to local residents informing them of their intention to remove the Emus and this has upset and outraged them. Lend Lease are claiming vandalism of fence lines as the reason the Emus must go. That some Emus are getting out into public areas and are putting themselves and the public at risk of injury. Yet there are no reported cases of any public injury. There was never an issue with fence vandalism and escaped Emus until Lend Lease commenced its development in the mid 2000’s. In 2001 Jackie Kelly the then Member for Lindsay famously declared 900 ha of the 1535 ha site would be set aside as a Regional Park to be run by the NSW Government. The NSW Government then promised that Emus and Kangaroos would be retained in the proposed reserve. Its now stated in their 2011 Wianamatta Regional Park Plan of Management. Yet in 2013 Lend Lease are still managing 836.5 ha of the zoned Regional Park and the NSW Government has only accepted ownership and management of 63.5 ha. A major factor in this dilemma is that the NSW Government is refusing to accept ownership of the entire Regional Park. So we have a developer, whose expertise is housing development, in charge of the majority of the sites wildlife and threatened ecological communities. 828 ha of the site is listed in the Register of the National Estate due to its outstanding conservation value. The problem is Lend Leases unsuitability to manage a wildlife reserve not vandalism or the Emus. What is needed is for the NSW Government to finally take responsibility for the full 900 ha reserve. Surely 27 Emus can be managed with a 900 ha reserve.

Christmas is a time when the Socialist Alliance dress up as smiling father Christmases and give presents away to the kiddies. So do missionaries to newly discovered tribes, before they take over their land. Some protestors are like sheep and trust these wolves. Most experienced activists know that the SA always finishes up delivering to the power elites. So they are out to stop people talking about population growth and to disorganise overdevelopment protests, whilst pretending to participate. They threaten effective democratic protestors - sometimes with violence - and try to split them up. They talk the talk but they don't walk the walk. Their leaders are also known to scheme to take over any well-financed or politically well-positioned NGO in order to get at their funding or extend their power to scam. Beware any organisation with SA members on its management board. They will offer to help you then take advantage of you. So, stick together folk; don't follow the SA.

I was declared schizophrenic because I refused to use a bicycle helmet. I looked at the Queensland child protection act s326:

CRIMINAL CODE - SECT 326 Endangering life of children by exposure

... and found out that a bicycle helmet with no adequate sun protection would expose a child to the likelihood of serious harm, serious because the death rate from melanoma has gone up more than 50% over the past decade.

Then I discovered that due to what was uncovered by the IPA:

Australia's helmet law disaster

The behavior of the minister for child protection could be seen as serious, outside the confines of acceptable behavior and criminal in nature.
The bicycle helmet per se, may be good, but the compulsory wearing law is unenforceable. See also http://www.cyclehelmets.org/1193.html

AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY-: Whatever will benefit Australia - that we are for; whatever will harm Australia - that we are against. William Lane :- PRESS RELEASE Nominations for the Native Australian Award THE ORDER OF THE TOAD are invited from Australian Citizens, to be formally declared on AUSTRALIA DAY 26th January 2014 GENERAL CRITERIA. This award is derived from the vernacular heritage of Australia’s pioneering peoples, who applied the term to those who betrayed fairdinkum values, or undertook what were considered un-Australian activities. The graphic symbol of the award, Bufo Marinus, [Cane Toad] should exemplify the character of any nominee - a terminal despoiler, necessitating complete removal from any influence in our Australian civilisation. Nominations are restricted to individuals who could be classed either as Native Australian, or as an assimilable post war immigrant. Persons nominated should have excelled in the prevailing Traitor Class:- Globalists and internationalists working against the European derived identity of the Australian Nation, and the Great Cause of Independence for Australia; bourgeois liberals; media sycophants; quisling politicians; money changers who advance economics as the prime determinant in society; Australia-hating multicultists undermining our Aussie culture and heritage; Aborigine Race destroyers, proponents of over population through mass immigration, advocates for fake refugees, exploiters pillaging the environment and adding to the destruction of the eco-systems of our Native Land. Please forward the name and address of the person to be nominated, with full particulars, including references to support the nomination, by 10th January 2014, to the address below. Include your own name and address. AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY Identity - Freedom - Independence P O Box 223 Croydon 3136. National Contact Line: 02 8587 0014www.australiafirst.net email: [email protected] AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY- RECLAIMING AUSTRALIA FOR AUSTRALIANS

Kelly O'Shanassy replies that "In our Charter, we set a goal to reduce Victoria's ecological footprint by 25 percent by 2020 and to sustainable levels by 2050...". What's the point of focusing on per capita footprint size when any reduction in consumption levels, greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts will be offset by more and more people! While population continues to grow at third-world levels, and about 1500 new people arrive in our State each week, reducing Victoria's ecological footprint would be an academic and futile exercise. Individual ecological footprints may be reduced by 25% by 2050, but at present rates of growth, Melbourne will be bursting with 8 million people, and 11 million people in Victoria? Population growth has a multiplying effect, and silly to skirt around the raging elephant in the room, with empty goals! It's pointless supporting any environmental, climate change or planning organisations, ngo, unless they have a sustainable population policy.

Information to tell your relatives or friends. You know how you hear on the radio & TV the public trustee advertising for estate management and Wills. There sales pitch is that they prepare your Wills for free BUT the public trustee MUST be appointment executor & trustee of the Will. They arrange probate and distribute the estate on your death. IF your total estate is worth $950,000.00 which is not difficult as that includes value of your home, shares, money in bank accounts etc etc. What do you think they charge? On an estate worth $950,000 to $1 million. They take $17,800.00 on your death before the estate is distributed to the beneficiaries. People complain that solicitors charge from $2,500 to $7,000.00 for probate depending on the size of the estate and amount of work involved. I cannot believe how many people use the public trustee. I think a lot of them take the free Wills and do not bother to even ask what it will cost them, I cant understand people being so stupid, apparently there are over a couple of hundred thousand registered with the Public Trustee. Just because they got a free Will - big deal the cost of a Will varies from $200 to 400 yet they are losing nearly $20,000.00 from their estate. Appoint an executor of your choice and prepare your Will. It is extremely important and ensures your estate passes to your beneficiaries not a Government Department.

Whilst the extreme and needless cruelty recorded in this video cannot be excused, it seems more likely that such cruelty will occur in dysfunctional societies such as that on the Gaza strip.

Occupying only 360 square kilometres, the Gaza strip has become the refuge for an estimated 1,763,387 Palestinians. The population density is 4,898 people per square kilometres. This gives each Gazan Palestinian only 204 square metres, or a square of land with a side of only 14.3 metres on which to subsist!

The Palestinians' land was stolen by Jewish settlers. This was the result of the establishment, on the land occupied by Palestine, the state of Israel in 1947 and is subsequent expansion in the Six Day War of 1967.

As well, Israel has launched a number of unprovoked wars against its neighbours including Lebanon, Syria and Egypt and has committed acts of terrorism and launched air and missile strikes against other countries, including Iran.

Israel, as well as its US ally, through the use of proxy Islamist extremist terrorists (many of whom profess hostility to Israel) which both support (although Israel does so less overtly), are acting to destroy the neighbouring secular Arab state of Syria and ultimately launch a war against Iran and other middle Eastern and Central Asian countries.

If this is not stopped, the magnitude of death and human and animal suffering will be much greater. Let's hope that other Palestinians in Gaza will act to prevent further cruelty such as that shown in the video before it does untold harm to their cause and others in the region.

Shocking footage of Australian cattle being abused in the Gaza Strip should re-ignite a national debate on the legitimacy of the live export trade. Footage emerged of Australian cattle being tortured in Gaza, with the most disturbing images showing a bound animal being stabbed in the eye and another knee-capped with bullets from an assault rifle. With his legs bound and his body outstretched, a bull was helpless as a slaughterman clumsily cut at his throat with a blunt knife. The terrified animal was conscious throughout the prolonged and agonising ordeal, thrashing his head, blinking constantly and looking up at his tormentors as his throat was sawn open. It's unimaginable horror, and sadism! Australian regulations failed to prevent the suffering of this animal, and others like him. This trade is masquerading as a valid economic activity but it's really a sham, and shamefully spreading and endorsing horrific animal cruelty overseas. Labor senators voted with the Coalition in the Senate on Thursday to overturn an Australian Greens motion calling for the cessation of exports until an investigation into previous welfare issues is complete. However, the motion was turned down! Filmed by civilians during the Festival of Sacrifice in October, this footage shows cattle being terrorised by crowds and tortured in streets and makeshift slaughterhouses — all in breach of Australia's live export regulations. It's a victory parade of human dominance over the hapless animals that will be horrifically slaughtered, and made to suffer extreme pain and humiliation in the process. Ban Live Exports: Take Action on Gaza

There're 76 million people in Iran, the country of origin of Sam Dastyari. If he enjoys crowds, and a "big" population, he should return to his country!
There's nothing worse than migrants who come here and claim Australia is under-populated and we should ramp up immigration!

In late July, Iran’s government announced that it would no longer fund family planning programs, a dramatic reversal following 20 years of support. The change is especially abrupt for a country that has been lauded as a family planning success story, with thorough rural health services and an educated female population contributing to one of the swiftest demographic transitions in history.

After years of successful efforts to curb its population growth by offering free or very inexpensive family planning services and promoting the idea that “two children are enough” in their health centers, Iran is dramatically changing its population policy.

Sixty-five percent of entering classes at universities are women. How can you convince them to have a child every year? Government efforts to overpopulate may not work!

However, Australia's population growth is politically-engineered, without public debate. We don't need new-comers like this Dastyari to destroy the efforts of many Australians to be sustainable, care for the environment, and ensure that future generations inherit an intact country - not destroyed by overpopulation. This cheap publicity effort, and no-brainer way to increase the size of our GDP at great cost, should be ignored as a feeble effort to gain publicity.

Labor Senator Sam Dastyari made a 'Big Australia' speech in parliament on December 11, 2013. Predictably, although the Senator only trotted out some very familiar cliches, unsubstantiated by any sense of democracy or science, the Press has fallen over itself to promote this lightweight speech. The fact that he comes from a migrant background is no excuse to subject Australia to a Phillippines fate. Talking up population is an easy way for the most non-descript politician to raise his/her profile, because the commercial and public press will immediately publicise his statements, since they are the mouthpiece of the growth lobby. The growth lobby, notably the property developers and the related industries upstream and downstream will throw money at him. Expect to hear more of Dastyari unless he somehow blots his copybook, or simply cannot come up with another speech. Dastiyari's empty words will also be in line with Bill Shorten's plans, because Shorten clearly signalled that he was prepared to ram big population down the rest of our throats if he became leader of the opposition. The majority vote by ordinary labor members for Albanese was perhaps a reaction to this. We can expect a lot more Sam Dastyari's barracking for growth over democracy in Parliament, unfortunately.

The whole "planning" of Melbourne is corrupt, and ruled by vested interests and distorted priorities. Melbourne's vital arteries are clogged, and already our city is crawling almost to a stand-still in many areas due to traffic congestion.

Planning should be holistic, not just allowing property developers access our suburbs for their profits. Planning should be about building hospitals, schools, ambulances, public transport, not just about cramming more people into our city, up to 8 million by 2050!
How are the public meant to agree and accept 70% of housing growth be confined to existing areas? Once a city is mature, adding more people and housing will simply clog up our city even more, exacerbating our city's problems. Already our infrastructure is heavily overloaded, and the $8 billion EW Link will absorb and suck out essential funding.
The East West link is not for the people, the commuters of Melbourne, but for the business lobby. Ironically, it's assumed that people living in the high density and high rise apartments will not need private transport, but the EW Link assumes private car use!

The EW Link is primarily to create Melbourne as the biggest transport hub in Australia. It's to support the supply chains of all the increasing imported goods we will be importing from overseas, thanks to the decline of even iconic national brands such as Qantas and Holden! With more and more shipping containers arriving with goods, they will need the EW Link to deliver them around the country. The empty shipping containers will continue to accumulate, symbolic of our empty economy, and empty policies coming from our State government.

No wonder Melbourne's planning committee is in disarray! It's a rort, full of contradictions and oxymorons.

n Friday, 6 December 2013 4:10 PM, Mike Lean (Port of Hastings Development Authority) wrote: Dear Stakeholder, The Port of Hastings Development Authority would like to advise that marine surveys will shortly commence as part of early planning for the Port of Hastings container expansion project. The marine surveys will collect information on the physical and chemical characteristics of existing port areas and surrounds, by mapping the physical features of the seabed and taking seabed samples of soil and rock. This will provide the critical baseline information needed to inform port design and detailed scientific studies over the next three to four years of detailed planning for an expanded container port at Hastings. Geotechnical surveys will be undertaken by specialist contractors, Worley Parsons, using two stationary jack-up barges, collecting core samples from the seabed. Geophysical surveys will be undertaken by specialist contractors, Aurecon, using sonar reflection and profiling survey techniques to complete detailed mapping of the seabed. The Authority and specialist contractors are preparing to begin the marine surveys from the 9th December 2013 onwards. Surveys will cease for the Christmas period, from the 21st December 2013, and resume on the 6th January 2014. Details of the surveys progress including weekly notifications of expected survey locations will be available at www.portofhastings.com. In the interests of personal safety, mariners, recreational users and visitors are advised to keep clear of the barges and survey vessels, with a distance of 100m recommended, and to observe the Harbour Masters directions at all times. All surveys will be carried out under strict environmental controls and approvals. For further information please call 1300 149 478, email [email protected] or visit www.portofhastings.com.au. Yours sincerely, Mike Lean Chief Executive Officer Port of Hastings Development Authority 2/34 High St Hastings Victoria 3915 (PO Box 129 Hastings Victoria 3915) P 1300 149 478| F 03 5979 5555 | E [email protected] | W www.portofhastings.com

Say all living creatures belonged to us (humanity) and were our treasures in our collection. We could consider them as such if it helps. To lose precious and rare parts of our "collection'"progressivley is like an art collector time and time again losing unique masterpieces by famous dead artists. What unique species and masterpieces by dead artists have in common is that neither can be replaced.

Title was: Four kangaroos deliberately mowed down in mudgee. - Ed

Today I witnessed the aftermath of deliberate cruelty. I was called out to two injured adult roos and a Joey. It was in fact three adults and an at foot Joey that had been mowed down and left to die. All three adults and Joey had to be euthanised by the police.

When I got there two adult females had been euthanised but the Joey was still alive with blood seeping through the ear, lying on his side unable to move. Soon after we discovered another adult female on her side unable to get up and clearly in a lot of pain.

All four were in the tyre tracks of a car that had deliberately left the road to run them down.

What upset me most is knowing no one is going to be held accountable for this abhorrent cruelty.

The disassociation by the general public about the pain and grief native animals suffer sickens me. Can you imagine if it were someone's pets lying by the side of the road still alive? The whole street and the emergency services there would be there with demands to catch the perpetrators.

I managed to get a photographer from the local paper, the police and the council to come out to the scene of carnage of a 100 metre stretch of a quiet suburban, residential road. But why an earth were the residents who live on that road more eager to get to work on time than help these poor innocent kangaroos?

Sorry to off load with yet another case of cruelty. When I talk about this to non wildlife carers I get the look of 'it isn't a big deal'. But it is a big deal and until these sickos are hunted down and made to pay, nothing is going to change. Just a slap on the wrist with a wet lettuce leaf.

Holly x (Mudgee Wildlife Carers Network)

AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY Mr Lino A. Saputo Jr 24th November 2013 Chief Executive Officer Saputo Incorporated OPEN LETTER 6869 Métropolitain Blvd East Saint -Léonard. Québec H1P 1X Canada Dear Sir, RE: WARRNAMBOOL CHEESE AND BUTTER FACTORY I write on behalf of members and concerned citizens, in relation to reports of your company’s intention for economic exploitation in seeking to purchase this iconic Australian enterprise in Warrnambool, Victoria. The concern is that the any such undertaking by foreign corporations is imperialistic, undermines Australia’s integrity and independence, and is not in the interests of, nor ever been requested by the Australian People. We consider this a very serious matter. Your attention is drawn to understanding that imperialism in the economy of Australia in dispossessing Australians of the ownership and benefit of our own resources, is an intolerable compromise of the Commonwealth of our People. Your corporation may have been misled by elements of our political caste that foreign investment/ economic exploitation in our Australian Society is welcome, however be under no illusions as this position emanates from money changer’s Quislings. It may also be that your intent has been influenced by the same in their parroting for an “Asian Century” for Australians, albeit without any authority from our citizens, aware that this dogma offers nothing for our European derived civilisation. I therefore caution your corporation against ignoring this situation in continuing with this imperialistic assault on our Australian Commonwealth, and bring to your notice that our Australian Peoples Movement, under the full authority of our People, will enforce without redress or compensation, the eradication of such pillaging of Australia’s economic interests, as a necessity for our national self respect and independence. I urge your corporation to add to the process of mutual respect between the Australian and Canadian People by refraining from such imperialistic activity as has been reported. To this end I request a public announcement from your corporation rescinding any such intent, which will effectively close this very important matter. Your immediate attention will be appreciated. Yours faithfully, Bob Beavers Assistant State Convenor Melbourne Branch P. O. Box 223 Croydon 3136 www.australiafirstparty.net [email protected] National Contact Line – 02 8587 0014

Jonathon Cook writes in The Legacy of Nelson Mandela: A Dissenting Opinion on Global Research on 6 Dec 2013 :

There was a price to be paid for [Nelson Mandela's] long walk to freedom, and the end of South Africa’s system of racial apartheid. Mandela was rehabilitated into an “elder statesman” in return for South Africa being rapidly transformed into an outpost of neoliberalism, prioritising the kind of economic apartheid most of us in the west are getting a strong dose of now. In my view, Mandela suffered a double tragedy in his post-prison years. First, he was reinvented as a bloodless icon, one that other leaders could appropriate to legitimise their own claims, as the figureheads of the “democratic west”, to integrity and moral superiority. After finally being allowed to join the western “club”, he could be regularly paraded as proof of the club’s democratic credentials and its ethical sensibility.

...

... He was forced to become a kind of Princess Diana, someone we could be allowed to love because he rarely said anything too threatening to the interests of the corporate elite who run the planet. ...

...

Our willingness to suspend our anger this week, to listen respectfully to those watery-eyed leaders who forced Mandela to reform from a fighter into a notable, keeps us in our slumber.

Next week there will be another reason not to struggle for our rights and our grandchildren’s rights to a decent life and a sustainable planet. There will always be a reason to worship at the feet of those who have no real power but are there to distract us from what truly matters. No one, not even a Mandela, can change things by him or herself. There are no Messiahs on their way, but there are many false gods designed to keep us pacified, divided and weak.

... come on is this Australia or soon to be CHINA?

Editorial comment: Whilst I don't preclude that that Australia may have lost self-reliance in this critical regard as it already has in a number of others, I have not been able to find any evidence on the web. Could you supply some links?

The Telegraph article Tony Blair asked me to 'help invade Zimbabwe', says Thabo Mbeki, linked to from a Twitter post of 7 Dec 2013, shows Thabo Mbeki, who succeeded Nelson Mandela to become President of South Africa from 1999 until 2008, in a far more favourable light than the odious then British 'Labour' Prime Minister Tony Blair :

When Zimbabwe began sinking into economic collapse and political repression in 2000 ... Mr Mbeki favoured a negotiated settlement; Mr Blair wanted Mr Mugabe to go, by force if necessary.

Tony Blair ... was saying to the chief of the British armed forces, 'you must work out a military plan so we that can physically remove Robert Mugabe'." ...

...

Mr Mbeki explained that the idea was rejected on principle because Britain had no right to decide who leads African countries. ... "So we said 'no, let Zimbabweans sit down, let them talk'."

The fact that Robert Mugabe has been re-elected President in the elections of 31 July 2013 shows that Zimbabweans themselves didn't accept Tony Blair's claim that Zimbabwe was facing economic crisis or if it was, that Robert Mugabe was the cause.

In contrast to the seemingly principled stand taken by President Thabo Mbeki against military interference in Zimbabwe, Naomi Klein has shown that, far from liberating black South Africans, he as well as the former President, Nelson Mandela (1918-2013), who, since his recent death, has been haloed by the international mainstream media1, in fact, betrayed their own black supporters by imposing economic neoliberal disaster capitalism similar to what is described in the rest of Klein's book:

So, rather than calling for the nationalisation of the mines, Mandela and Mbeki began meeting with Harry Oppenheimer, former chairman of the mining giants Anglo-American and De Beers, the economic symbols of apartheid rule. Shortly after the 1994 election, they even submitted the ANC's economic program to Oppenheimer for approval and made several key revisions to address his concerns as well as those of other top industrialists.28 Hoping to avoid getting another shock from the market, Mandela, in his first post-election interview as president, carefully distanced himself from his previous statements favouring nationalisation. "In our economic policies ... there is not a single reference to things like nationalisation, and this is not accidental," he said. "There is not a single slogan that will connect us with any Marxist ideology."29 The financial press offered steady encouragement for this conversion; "Though the ANC still has a powerful leftist wing," The Wall Street Journal observed, "Mr Mandela has in recent days sounded more like Margaret Thatcher than the socialist revolutionary he was once thought to be."30

...

In June 1996, Mbeki unveiled the results: it was a neoliberal shock therapy for South Africa, calling for more privatisation, cutbacks to government spending, labor "flexibility," freer trade and even looser controls on money flows. According to Gelb, its overriding aim "was to signal to potential investors the government's (and specifically the ANC's) commitment to the prevailing orthodoxy."34 To make sure the message was loud and clear to traders in New York and London, at the public launch of the plan, Mbeki quipped, "Just call me a Thatcherite."35

- - from The Shock Doctrine - The rise of Disaster Capitalism (Penguin, 2007) by Naomi Klein, pp208-210 (most emphasis added).

Footnote[s]

1 Even the otherwise invaluably informative Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA - English translation) promotes the myths about the late Nelson Mandela, for example in its article Mandela, South Africa's anti-apartheid icon dies in Johannesburg of 6 Dec 2013 :
...
Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela was born in July 1918. He was the icon of South Africa's anti-apartheid struggle. Mandela served as South Africa's president from 1994 until 1999. He was elected in multiracial elections in 1994 to become South Africa's first black president.
His government had focused on dismantling the apartheid system through confronting institutional racism, poverty, inequality and on promoting the ethnic reconciliation.
Mandela's government also worked on promoting agrarian reform, fighting poverty and expanding health care services.
...

Thousands of healthy greyhound puppies are disappearing, presumed killed, every year, but their deaths are not reported or investigated by the $144 million greyhound racing industry. Shocking details about puppy farming and the mass killing of the pups have emerged as a record number of people and organisations told a NSW parliamentary inquiry about the dark practices of the greyhound industry. In 2011, up to 3440 puppies were born in registered litters but disappeared before they were named. Naming is a prerequisite for the dogs to race. ''The industry is characterised by routine killings of puppies and dogs, greed and profits,'' a submission by rescue group Amazing Greys says. It's not just puppies that are disappearing. There were possibly thousands of others from litters that had never been registered and discarded if they were injured or too slow. He said only a tiny fraction of these ''surplus dogs'' were found homes Self-regulation in industries doesn't work. When animals are involved, the same groups profiting from their breeding, usage and disposal are those who are supposed to be in charge of their welfare! It's doomed to fail, similarly to the live export and other livestock industries. Inquiry told of cruelties as greyhound slaughter continues unchecked

There has been a new surge of migrant arrivals in Italy in the past week or so, despite the fact that the number of such attempts to cross the Mediterranean by boat usually decreases with the onset of winter. "Migrants" by definition are those who choose to leave their countries to seek better lives. They are not "asylum seekers" who, by definition, are not safe in their own land. European officials now propose allowing people to apply for asylum in Europe from abroad, part of a package of measures intended to discourage dangerous, illegal journeys like the one that cost the lives of hundreds of immigrants off the coast of Italy in October. This would allow refugees to go through the asylum-application process from abroad. This option, if implemented, could help thousands of people who might otherwise pay smugglers—and risk their lives on the journey—to seek asylum in Northern European countries that have a good track record of accepting such refugees. Critics like Amnesty International and the International Red Cross argue, however, that the EU still focuses too much on protecting its borders rather than protecting people and saving lives. They would like to dissolve sovereignties. Lives would be saved if economic migrants weren't rewarded by being accepted so readily for successfully surviving dangerous sea crossings! It fuels the migration. The effort is to "save lives" rather than dealing with the source of the problem. Overpopulation drives scarcities and conflicts, and drives up the numbers of asylum seekers to present day record numbers, and migrants to get a "better life". The emphasis should be on genuine asylum seekers, not migrants!

It's like a large battling family, irresponsibly continuing to have babies! They can't supply the family's needs, such as food, clothing, so they end up getting welfare to provide it for them! Governments need to be answerable to the public, as their role. To keep bringing in population, when already there is a huge backlog of infrastructure and overloaded services and "shortages" of facilities, it irresponsible. The public should not be forced to pay for this massive population growth, especially as it's detrimental to living standards and our State's finances. Already population growth is overloading our hospitals, roads, schools, and prisons. Why continue with the growth madness? The only group to be advantaged is property developers, bankers and big businesses - and they won't contribute to all the population's needs. "Planning" should be about providing health care, schools, public housing, public transport, jobs etc, not just the growth in housing.

Big populations create a large pool of consumers as a potential resource for growing corporations to profit from. People are being accumulated for their benefit. It's a brute-force way to increase the size of the GDP, and keep afloat the price of housing. Governments are increasingly being hijacked by business interests, due to the size of their lobby groups. Global markets mean businesses can gain more power than governments, and hold them to ransom. Trade agreements means they can have a huge grip of how we consume, what we pay and how spend. The Fairfax press, The Age and SMH, promote themselves as being "Independent Always" but on the contrary, they are big traders in real estate. Their heavily censored newspapers distort the truth, and the concerns of the public, especially over population issues. Democracy is becoming more expensive, with fines and penalties for protesting increasing. Policies are being "streamlined" to over-ride public debate and inputs into planning our cities. "Wealth" though amassing humans is the alternative to smaller and productive communities. It's cruel as living standards and democracy must eventually decline. This is why "diversity" is being promoted - more people immigrating from third world nations means they will be submissive, and captive to lower standards of living. Fragmented societies are less organised, united and this division is an advantage as governments become more autocratic.

Australia has the strongest anti-smoking laws in the world. They’re so successful that other countries want to do the same. But Big Tobacco isn’t happy about this -- and the Australian government is about to agree to a deal that lets them trample all over us whenever they want. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a US-driven trade pact that that could let companies sue us to get rid of whichever of our hard-fought protections they don’t like. The whole deal is being negotiated in secret, and this weekend Trade Minister Robb is set to agree to ru! les none of us had a say in. But opposition is building in Australia and other countries. Just today the ALP and Greens teamed up to demand transparency. Abbott’s team is on the ropes from the Indonesian spying scandal, let’s use this crucial opportunity to stall the talks and stand up for our health -- send a message to Minister Robb now! Avaaz Petition: Selling out Australia's Democracy

The Coalition said it would send a Customs vessel to the Southern Ocean to monitor whaling activity by Japanese ships. Now, their promise is being diluted!

The Ocean Protector, an armed vessel designed to tackle illegal fishing in the Southern Ocean, is currently patrolling waters near Christmas Island as part of Operation Sovereign Borders.

A spokesman for the environment minister, Greg Hunt, said that the government hoped the International Court of Justice would rule in favour of Australia to prevent Japanese whaling in the coming season. Japan's defence at the court had more to do with their "cultural preferences", and they almost admitted that their "research" had little foundation!

Last week the New Zealand navy sent the HMNZS Otago to monitor fishing in the Antarctic region. Foreign Affairs Minister Murray McCully said it was important that New Zealand played its part in the region as a member country of the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. However, the navy may not be able to monitor illegal fishing in the Southern Ocean because its ships are not up to the task.

New Zealand's navy patrol of the Antarctic fishery was cancelled because of concerns about its offshore patrol vessels' ability to operate in Antarctic waters. What sort of Antarctic patrol vessel is this, unable to operate in Antarctic waters? It will be back in NZ just as the Sea Shepherd crew arrive!

Too many successive governments have turned away from Japan's economic power, and abandoned Sea Shepherd. This government should stop turning a blind eye to whaling in our waters and should have a Customs vessel in the Southern Ocean. The Antarctic is a protected marine wildlife reserve, and its status needs to be protected from poachers.

Thanks to $200 million of taxpayers' money, and farmers efforts, the amount of dredge to be taken from the Great Barrier Reef has been reduced by 340,000 tonnes.

That's the good news!

The bad news is that 140 million tonnes of marine sediment are proposed to be dredged during port development in the Great Barrier Reef over the next decade, according to my calculations from port development plans.

That enormous amount of material in the water will have tremendous effect on marine creatures, such as dogongs, turtles, fish and seagrass. More developments are up for approval, including a decision by Environment Minister Tony Hunt, due by 13 December on whether Abbot Point can be expanded to become one of the world’s biggest coal ports, which would involve dumping 3 million cubic metres of dredged spoil into the reef.

This could do great damage to Australia too. Due to UNESCO listing, it could hurt Australia economically if it hit reef tourism, which brings in $6.4 billion a year in direct spending and employs more than 64,000 people.

Australia obviously can't look after the environment, either our unique biodiversity richness or our world class natural heritage. The Colonial mentality of slash, burn, cut, kill and dig still exists today, but with even bigger equipment! Despite all our understanding of environmental impacts and climate change, the destruction continues. It's profits and corporations against conservation and coal exports.

The problem of aiming for perpetual economic growth means continually loosening environmental controls, and losing control of what really values. We have such a rich natural heritage, being wrecked by incompetent governments and their slavery to corporate mega-dollars.

Brisbane Times: Dredging set to swamp decades of Great Barrier Reef protection

“Australia continues to give the go-ahead for the development of several new coal and natural gas ports within the Great Barrier Reef.” According to the presage of Blue Ocean Institute Founder, PBS’ Saving Oceans host, and award-winning author Carl Safina in National Geographic: “The continued destruction of the reef seems inevitable.”

ForceChange: Petition President Obama to save our Great Barrier Reef, seeing the Australian government is blinded by $$$$

Palm oil companies in Peru are seeking permission to clear 100,000 hectares of rainforest. Dear friends of the rainforests, Environmentalists working in the Amazon rainforest in Peru have written to us to express their deep concern: palm oil companies and international speculators are buying vast tracts of rainforest from the government – even though clearing primary forest is illegal. Around 10,000 hectares of rainforest have already been felled illicitly to make room for oil palm monocultures. Initially, the Peruvian government ignored protests by local residents. It was not until environmental activists informed the local press and put the illegal activities on the front pages that the authorities responded, sending the police and state prosecutor to investigate. It has since come to light that plantation owners in Peru have requested permission to clear 100,000 hectares of Amazon rainforest for oil palms. And this appears to be just the beginning – millions of hectares are already being earmarked behind the scenes. It’s not too late, however. Resistance is taking shape, but at great personal risk – environmental activists and the state prosecutor have received death threats. Yet the local residents want to preserve the Amazon rainforest and refuse to be intimidated. Please help us support them and sign our petition to the Peruvian government to protest the destruction of this unique ecosystem for a sprawling oil palm monoculture. TAKE ACTION

on 27 November ABC Radio National broadcast a provably false claim by the BBC1 that Syrian Government military forces had "dropped a 'napalm-like' bomb on a school playground nearby."

Susan Dirgham, National Coordinator of "Australians for Mussalaha (Reconciliation) in Syria" responded by posting the following to the program web page:

Dear Andrew,

For a number of reasons, I was greatly disturbed to hear this report on RN's 'Religion and Ethics Report'.

Firstly, there has been serious questioning about the authenticity of this report of a Syrian government attack on a school on 29 August. Even Craig Murray, a former UK ambassador, has suggested the original BBC report which featured Dr Ahsan's UK colleague was not reliable. Secondly, we are not informed by RN that Dr Ahsan was a captain in the UK army before she studied medicine and she has experience of war zones. Dr Ahsan is also very media savvy, having presented many programs on television; she even has an agent as she is a presenter for hire. Thirdly, we are not informed that Dr Ahsan must have crossed into Syria illegally to enter 'rebel' territory in the north and that the UK colleague she accompanied is purported to have family links to the militarized opposition. In crossing into Syria via the Turkish border, Dr Ahsan would have surely seen evidence of at least some of the thousands of foreign jihadists going into Syria to fight the regular army. Some go to fight for an Islamic caliphate, with Damascus as its capital, while others go because they hear dubious media reports such as this which make them believe Muslims are under attack and they need to be 'saved'.

In October, Rachel Kohn wrote on the 'Religion and Ethics Report' blog: "The assault on religious freedom is one of the most important trends in the world today, yet it remains under-reported and even ignored by most secular media outlets." This assault on religious freedom is occurring in Syria. In recent weeks, it has become even more evident that Christians have been particularly targeted by extremist fighters in Syria. Schools and school buses have been attacked, children and teachers killed. Ancient Christian towns, such as Maaloula where Aramaic is still spoken, have been attacked by 'rebels'. Many churches have been targeted, priests and bishops kidnapped and killed, yet instead of an accurate in-depth analysis of all this, "Religion and Ethics Report" presents what could be fairly described as very crude war propaganda.

Andrew West, presenter of the Religion and Ethics Report responded in an e-mail:

I have posted your comment but the interview quoted UN reports.

I'm simply not going to enter into a long debate about these matters, Susan.

On previous programs, we have pointed out the role of foreign jihadis and Saudi backed extremists.

But it is increasingly clear to me that you are unwilling to countenance any criticism of the Assad regime at all.2 There are no good guys3 in this fight.

Being a propagandist for Assad will have the same impact on me as being a propagandist for the jihadi "resistance". That is, none.

Please do not bombard me with material, as you did before or I will simply block your emails.

Footnote[s]

1. The BBC is known to have repeatedly lied to its audiences about the Syrian conflict. Evidence of this deceit about the Syrian conflict can be found in the following articles: BBC abandoning a pretense of journalism of 6 Oct 2013 on Voltaire Net, MEA CULPA: BBC world news editor: Houla massacre coverage based on opposition propaganda of 15 Jun 2012, The Criminal Voices of Media Propaganda. The Insidious Role of the BBC of 3 Sep 2013, The BBC: A Criminal Instrument in the War on Syria of 24 Aug 2013, Fake BBC Video: Irrefutable Evidence of a Stunning bit of Fakery by the BBC of 7 Oct 2013 and BBC Media Fabrications on Alleged Incendiary Bomb Attack in Aleppo, Syria of 5 Oct 2013 on Global Research and
The role of the BBC in the Syrian conflict
of 3 Nov 2013 on Apophenia. The BBC was also found in a court case to have lied to protect the terrorists who committed the 9/11 false flag outrages.
2. In 2003, the fraudulent claim that the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein threatened its neighbours with Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) was used to justify the invasion which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. Given that horrific death toll and that 120,00 Syrians have already died at the hands of the US-backed terrorists, why shouldn't Susan and others who wish to end the current war in Syria, be allowed to show that similar claims made against the government of the popular President Bashar al-Assad are equally fraudulent?
3. By use of terms like "good guys" and "bad guys" Andrew West is apparently attempting to trivialise this gravely serious conflict. If we must use such terminology, then surely the Syrian Government and the members of the Syrian armed forces, who, at a terrible price, have courageously defended their people against the sadistic terrorist invaders, are entitled to claim the label of the "good guys".

Originally published here on 2 Dec 2013 on Adam Bandt's web site. By Adam Bandt and Richard Di Natale. Re-posted to candobetter by Against Slavery.

A Greens motion to force the tabling of all documents that Infrastructure Australia has on the East-West toll road was passed on 2 December 2013 by the Senate.

Infrastructure Australia confirmed recently in Senate Estimates that the Victorian Government is yet to provide its full business case for the East West Link despite the Commonwealth Government planning to pour $1.5 billion into the toll road. It also confirmed that the new government had not asked it for advice on the East West link.

"The Senate today supported a Greens motion that will lift the veil of secrecy on the Coalition’s East West toll road," said Senator Di Natale, who moved the Order for the Production of Documents.v

"The Victorian and Federal Governments want to start paving the East West toll road without any proper public scrutiny. Tony Abbott promised to lead a transparent government but of course the Abbott Government has turned out to be about as transparent as a brick wall.

"On every issue, from climate change and education to infrastructure, Tony Abbott is determined to hide the evidence, deny the facts and ram through his reckless agenda. Today the Senate has said, 'enough is enough'."

Australian Greens Deputy Leader Adam Bandt said that the secrecy around the toll road was astounding.

"It is shocking that the government’s key infrastructure advisor has yet to see the full business case for the East-West toll road," said Mr Bandt.

"The government is trying to keep its business case secret because it knows the economics of the toll road don't add up.

"Well now we will know exactly what the Napthine government is saying to the key government adviser on Infrastructure."

Text of motion

The Senate orders that there be laid on the table by Infrastructure Australia or by the Infrastructure Coordinator by noon on Wednesday December 11 all documents in relation to the East West Link project provided to Infrastructure Australia by the Victorian Government, in particular but not restricted to the full business case.

Chinese interest in Australian residential property is booming, described as the biggest surge from an offshore market in his 30 years in real estate. Australia is undergoing a gold rush, with foreign investments in real estate. With the globalisation of our housing, it's not surprising that Australians new to the market are being squeezed out! In some suburbs, 90% of the market is owned by Chinese investors. Cashed-up buyers are snapping up everything from luxury harbour-side property in Sydney to apartments bought off the plan in Sydney, Melbourne the Gold Coast and Perth. It's assumed that Australia is still Terra Nullius, or an un-owned country, or international territory! The existing residents are being displaced and overwhelmed by increasingly rich Asians. The Chinese owners can then decide to live here, for the lifestyle and the education opportunities. There's no reciprocal agreements for Australians to enjoy China's new prosperity. The only limitation is that foreign buyers cannot buy existing or established homes in Australia. However, foreigners can buy new dwellings, off-the-plan houses or apartments under construction or yet to be built, or vacant land for development. Existing homes can be purchased by Australian property developers, and then they can transform them into multiple living spaces, to sell for big profits. The whole predatory industry leaves little opportunity for Australians on average wages to compete in such big players! The housing industry means we must grow our population to justify all the construction that's filling the hip pockets of investors. These apartment must have "fillers", and immigration rates must continue so that those building up equity in funds, and superannuation, are rewarded. Victoria First will have heavy competition, and profits speak louder than logic, democratic concerns and grass-roots activities. There are some powerful allies in the pro-growth lobby!

Many migrants leave their home countries in order to diversify their livelihoods, increase their incomes and protect their families from risk. By having one or two family members working in Europe, households have a steady source of income. Tens of thousands of African migrants who risk their lives to make the dangerous journey to Europe by boat each year. Others come hidden in the wheel hubs of tractor-trailers transported by ferry. Some even swim part of the way. Scores die en route. The agricultural policies and farm subsidies are really making domestic production collapse in a lot of countries in Africa. Cheap food from the EU flooding the African market, and causing people to lose their jobs. There's extreme poverty across much of the African continent. Due to Colonialism, the individualization of property led to the breakdown of traditional authority and community regulation over common resources. Some scholars therefore believe that a return to the pre-colonial situation, when traditional institutions once prevailed, will empower communities to manage their resources more sustainably. Colonialists used the colonies to provide raw materials and other resources for their own economic growth and development. The special attractions of Africa and Asia were, indeed, that they offered many of the raw materials needed by the multiplying factories of Europe: including cotton, silk, rubber, vegetable oils, and the rarer minerals. Colonialism brought about exploitation of economies and resource primarily through conquest of markets for capital and commodities. Colonialism led to the transportation of many goods to the country which colonised it. High birth rates contribute to overpopulation in many developing countries. Children are assets to many poor families because they provide labor, usually for farming. What's needed is not mass exodus to Europe, where they are largely unwelcome, but family planning. The problem must be identified before it can be addressed. Accepting displacements and dangerous voyages, to countries with open borders, will not encourage domestic solutions to the problem of over population.

The video embedded below was originally embedded in the article Public Banking: Taking Back Power from Finance Capitalists of 2 Oct 2013 by James Corbett and Ellen Brown on Global Research. In the video, Ellen Brown shows that if we were to replace the complex paper financial economy, based on private banking, with a public banking system in which the means (aka 'money') to facilitate the exchange of real wealth — artefacts, food, services, etc. — were simply issued by publicly owned banks, financial crises such as the global financial crises of 2007-2008 and all previous economic crises including Australian Treasurer Paul Keating's "recession we had to have" of 1992, the recession following the oil shock of 1973, the great depressions of 1929 and the 1890's, etc. could have been easily avoided.

Near the end of the interview, Ellen Brown explains how Australia's own (now misnamed) Commonwealth Bank (privatised, without any electoral mandate whatsoever, between 1992 and 1996 by the Federal 'Labor' governments of Bob Hawke and Paul Keating) made possible much of the prosperity and self-reliance Australia experienced until the late 20th century. Australia's participation in the First World War, unlike Great Britain's, was easily financed by the Commonwealth Bank (although Australia's participation in that war, which cost 60,000 Australian lives, was of questionable benefit to Australia and the rest of humanity).

“I’d also like to remind you that you are unique and you do not have to go all Asian,” she said. "I understand that this is a trend of Australia today – to try to become ‘Asianised’ as it were. “You are special because you are a unique combination of the east and the west. “I hope and pray that Australia will … make an example of the possibility of genuine unity and diversity.” Read more: "Aung San Suu Kyi awarded honorary doctorate from ANU Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/aung-san-suu-kyi-awarded-honorary-doctorate-from-anu-20131129-2ygo7.html#ixzz2m1mFC0io " The above article makes a lot of 'diversity' and tones down Aung san suu Kyi's comment, however, what else could you expect of a woman who has been trying to save a tribe - the Burmese - from being lost to a mixed nation-state. She understands that you need local democracy and identification with a place and a people in order to survive and forge civil rights. She is lauded for this by the very people who do not permit local solidarity in Australia and who want to atomize our society by imploding it with mass immigration.

How lame! "Inghams does not tolerate the mistreatment of our livestock.... We condemn the animal abuse we have seen in the footage and will work to review, retrain and reinforce our animal welfare standards.." It's sounds like pure political spin. The hapless birds are doomed to be slaughtered anyway, so it's assumed by the executioners that seeing nobody is looking, they will have a little tortuous "fun" and watch the turkeys suffer! With no job monitoring, in this macabre and sombre industry, how is slaughter to be "humane" anyway? This is more than "incidents". It's an ongoing mentality of closed-doors raising of birds and animals for industry. It's mass production, and factory-farming is the equivalent of the cruel days of exploiting children and adults in the British Industrial Revolution. It minimising living humans, and in this case birds, to mere throw-away commodities. The industry would like to ban all monitoring of livestock production. Every year in Australia between 3 and 5 million turkeys are killed for meat, the majority of which is consumed at Christmas time (though they suffer all year long!). It's to celebrate "peace on Earth" and "goodwill" at Christmas!

While our economic model of perpetual and endless growth relishes on a growing population, it has little regard or ways of implementing the resultant huge domestic population! It's about enjoying the moment, ignoring the end result. Since parliamentary periods in government are short, they can simply celebrate the growth and leave the fall-outs to the next generation and next governments. There are few politicians with any real vision. It's easy to concentrate of growth figures, GDP, and other objective and empirical data. There are many facets they should be considering, but they are under the wing of big businesses, drives to global markets and a huge number of consumers for profits. Large numbers of Chinese investors are vying our real estate, and buying apartments off the plan. Chinese migrants are helping friends and family in China to skirt Australia's foreign investment rules by purchasing established homes on their behalf, agents have told News Corp newspapers. They're marketing them in Hong Kong, Singapore and China and Australians not even getting a look-in. Globalisation and over-population are all about huge markets and buyers. It's a smorgasbord of opportunities for huge corporations, and nations with the buying power to overwhelm Australia - and our concerns. Government are increasingly being hijacked by big, international dollars.

The latest projections from the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows Australia's population will double in the next 60 years, driven by strong increases in Victoria and New South Wales. The bureau is projecting the population will soar from just under 23 million people to 46 million by 2075. This growth is not a natural trend, due to confidence in our economy, healthy fertility levels and a bright future for humanity and the planet. This growth is socially-engineered by our open-border approach to economic growth - at all costs. The built-in growth that's evolved to be part of our economy is driving up our numbers, at a time people are worried about their futures and the welfare of our planet. Australia has the highest rate of species extinctions, and this human growth will be the death-knell for many more, trying to hold out from deadly human impacts. Socially and environmentally, it will multiply our greenhouse gas emissions, and exacerbate the economic and social problems with have now. Jobs are failing to keep abreast with population growth, and housing is already unaffordable. More people will be permanently denied home ownership, and our infrastructure will bear double the load by 2075 that's already not able to cope. Where's the money coming from to provide for all these people, at a time when global resources are dwindling? Australia is increasingly relying on overseas supplies of liquid fuel, and gas is plentiful, but it's an export market. Our desert and semi-desert nation will be overloaded, at a time when climate change will have acted heavily on our ecosystems, and our "carrying capacity" will be reduced. This growth madness has never been a more serious problem, especially on the background of global over-population. We pay our politicians healthy salary packages to be our leaders, not make simplistic and naive one-dimensional decisions for "growth" at all costs! Policy-making should involve casting the net widely to gather information and data, and summarise trends, through consultation with government and non-government organisations, experts, scientists, and the public - the voters. There is no grounds for increasing our population to such dangerous levels - except to increase the size of our GDP - and force it up through brute-force!

Councils are beginning to react and object to the Plan Melbourne, and what's worshipped by our State government - "growth"! As reported in Peninsula-Wide "As plans are being developed to guide metropolitan Melbourne’s growth from its current population of four million to six million by the early 2030s, the Shire’s challenge is to continue to be ‘near to but not part of Melbourne and its accelerating growth’. Mornington Peninsula Shire Mayor Councillor Lynn Bowden said "the next 20 – 30 years will be one of the most challenging periods in the history of the Mornington Peninsula. “The Mornington Peninsula Shire is not – and does not want to be – a growth municipality". “Our community was talking to us about population growth, traffic and transport, use of the coast and environmental protection, employment and business, township character and green wedge and rural land use to name a few of the important issues". Cr Bowden said “the Mornington Peninsula is critical in many ways to the future sustainability, liveability and prosperity of the Melbourne region and Council’s submissions have continued to emphasise the need for continuing recognition and protection of the peninsula’s special roles and values”. Planning should not be synonymous to GROWTH, but protecting and enhancing amenities, natural heritage, the environment, living standards and ambience. What's needed is a real and productive economy, not one that's entirely and mainly linked to housing and mortgages.

After a strong start, signing has slowed. We know, based on polling, that 50% or more of people are concerned about population management. This means either the petition isn't reaching enough people or the message is not convincing them. Any thoughts? Please sign the petition and forward to friends and colleagues. Petition: Australia requires a public inquiry to determine a basis for the optimum rate of population growth

Revelations about the barbaric activity of using live "bait" for greyhound racing training have included details about the use of guinea pigs, rabbits, chickens, kittens and possums which have had their claws and teeth removed so they can't hurt the dogs, and being mauled to death in training sessions. RSPCA NSW chief inspector David O'Shannessy said they had also received anonymous complaints but so far they had been unable to substantiate the claims. Greyhound Racing NSW officials estimate that 3000 unwanted dogs a year are killed. But other estimates are as high as 6000. It is self regulated and because of that is an attractive target for corruption pressures. It's the case of "fox in charge of the chickens", and the honest ones lose out. Rehoming greyhounds once they had finished their racing career was a problem because it's ''scandalously low'' the numbers who find new homes. The inquiry has also heard that dogs have been mistreated, starved and dumped. Vets claim live animals are used as bait to train greyhounds Any use of animals for entertainment or industries is inherently flawed, and open to abuse and disposal of animals once they are not longer "useful" or valued commodities.

Public land hunting would remedy this problem of wild dogs. Volunteer shooters are the way to go.

Editorial comment : I don't see how this 'solution' even relates to the problem or how it could be more effective than the proposal put in the article to properly fence the dogs into residential areas away from the dogs. The broader and more serious problem is that expansion of residential areas has greatly reduced the amount of land available to kangaroos and consequently their numbers. - Ed

Our economy must deliver to us and to future generations otherwise it is a failure or worse still a menace. It must provide a livelihood , a long term sense of material security and reasonable equality, within the limits of the environment in which it operates. The economy should be asking what it can do for us not what we can do for it! Right now it seems to be the boss and not to be pleased with us at all. It's a bit puzzling since most of us haven't done anything particularly wilful , at least not knowingly. Perhaps the intention or hope of living to a ripe old age is considered a bit uncooperative.

This appalling industry has continued, despite public outcry of the extreme cruelty, and many exposures of the inability of the industry to self-regulate. The Indonesian government knows that our government is in the pockets of livestock exporters who desperately want this trade to continue. What a perfect "revenge" for the spying allegations against our government? Federal Agricultural minister Barnaby Joyce called off his trip to Indonesia, to talk about the live export trade. Australia's live cattle exports which is estimated to be worth around $174 million a year. It used to be quoted as worth $1 billion! Australia's reputation as an honest nation, with high standards of diplomacy, democracy, trade and animal welfare, is being torn apart by this atrocious trade. How can live animals be abandoned to Third World abattoirs, where workers have no standards, animals are hacked and sawed at without being stunned. After the 2011 ban, Indonesia was embarrassed, and retaliated by claiming that they would strive to be "self-sufficient" in red meat! This is not a "threat" but would be a victory for humane treatment of animals, and a sign that the live export industry is not economically, politically, environmentally or morally sustainable. To add to the revenge, a senior Indonesian immigration official says he will no longer take measures to stop asylum seekers attempting to take boats to Australia as the spying fallout continues. Indonesia can hardly take the high moral ground! Their atrocities and invasions of East Timor, West Papua and appalling human rights record hardly gives then this authority. Indonesia’s vibrant media routinely reports on crucial social and political issues including corruption, environmental destruction, and violence against religious minorities. But a rising climate of religious intolerance and an infrastructure of discriminatory national and local laws deny freedom of expression to Indonesia’s religious minorities. Upon arrival in Indonesia, cattle are offloaded in a country with no enforceable animal welfare laws. They are held in feedlots for further fattening. Some cattle will be stunned prior to slaughter. Some will be slaughtered by having their throat cut, while fully conscious. They may be killed in ways that would be illegal in Australia. Exporting live animals for slaughter is cruel.

Fantastic Sheila! Put it out there as by the time we are all able to retire we will be just about o our death beds. That's what the government want so they do not have to fund us.

It's a cruel and unrealistic assessment of the Productivity Commission to evaluate the value of older people in purely economic terms. Increasing the pension age does not mean that people will be working longer, and it's often hard to get jobs after 40! It could just prolong poverty and disadvantage. In the past, people would work in the same job for most of their lives, with the same employer. Times have changed, and unemployment has increased and so have casual jobs. This plan attacks people who have worked hard to own their own home. Eating up the house to pay for aged care will also deny descendants a chance to inherit a home, and for many people - thanks to the Ponzi housing based economic scheme - will be the only way they can afford one now! This plan is about robbing older people of all governments can get, and vilify them as "unproductive". Most volunteer jobs are done by the retired, and also they support working families by providing childcare, care for the ill, and the wisdom and stability that comes with ageing and maturity. People are not mere economic commodities, to be evaluated and assessed for their contribution towards economic growth! The economy is a system, a tool, to provide for human communities and the welfare of individuals in their youth, sickness, at times of vulnerability, and old age. If the economy becomes predatory, hostile, and each generation must suffer from a downgrade of living and working conditions, it needs to be reassessed as to it's real purpose.

Nimby, you say "urban planning has lost any professional status". Some planners have a vested interest in growth; others have to abide by their political masters' directions. Also, town planning is such a multi-disciplinary profession that planners must rely on the input of a wide range of professions, such as economists, geographers, architects, sociologists, environmental scientists, transport planners and construction engineers. If they fail to do this they can come up with some bizarre ideas. Consider, for example, the article in the Melbourne Age, 8/11/13 by planners Kim Dovey and David Yenkin, in which they claim "Proponents of tall buildings see height and density as necessary for economic growth, urban vitality and variety in housing stock ; opponents see the damage they do to the urban character and street-life of the city." Is this a balanced and valid appraisal of the arguments for and against high density development? No. It is nonsense to say that high density is necessary for economic growth. It is a by-product of growth - an unpleasant by-product! They go on to claim that concentrated populations will: 1. Generate wealth. To the contrary, wealth is destroyed when existing buildings are demolished to make way for taller buildings or road widening. Incidentally, this destruction is not included as a negative contribution to GDP, as with all the other environmental devastation caused by population growth. 2. Raise productivity by enabling closer personal and business contact. True to some extent, but in large agglomerations, such as Melbourne, these benefits are far outweighed by worsening traffic congestion and all the other symptoms of overcrowding. 3. Enable greater use of spare capacity in the transport network. This may be true of the rail network to the extent that trains could run more frequently, but certainly not for our grossly over-crowded road system, which is being forced into costly expansion (underground tunnels, etc.) to increase capacity. 4. Reduce rents by spreading land costs over greater numbers. This is over-simplified economics. Supply and demand theory tells us that, as populations increase, demand outstrips supply resulting in higher land prices. Developers are willing to pay the higher prices because they know they can pass on the higher costs to renters by spreading the higher costs over a larger number of storeys. Rents are unlikely to be reduced, because of the higher cost of land in the first place, but certain to increase because of the much higher per unit cost of high-rise construction. And the significance for low-income earners is that, because of population growth, they can be priced out of the housing market and into a rent-dependency poverty trap. 5. Create jobs. Good grief! Have town planners developed a new theory of employment that has not yet found its way into economics text books? Here is another example of convoluted town planning thinking - in the editorial of Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, Dec. 2000. "It is not population growth that will do the (world environmental) damage, any more than it is population size that tells us how much damage is now being done or has been done in the past. It is economic growth on the unregulated, fossil fuelled, market based and neoliberal model multiplied by population size that will cause the disaster." Make sense of that? Population growth has no bearing on population size? Could it be that town planners' careers are dependant on growth but not size "in this delightfully uncrowded country" (p.428)?

In September, the U.N. panel of climate scientists said that world temperature rises were headed to exceed 2.0C under most of its scenarios. It said that limiting warming would require "substantial and sustained" cuts in emissions. Australia's new policies under the Coalition government, shifting from an emissions trading scheme, would marginally raise emissions, adding to a problem that many nations were failing to stick to curbs on emissions agreed in 2009. What will raise emissions is our politically engineered population growth by 2020, estimated to be 25.2 million. The Climate Change Authority has described our the existing emissions reduction target of 5% by 2020 as “inadequate” and “not a credible option”. In a report, Population growth and Australia's greenhouse gas emission commitments , Bob Birrell and Ernest Healy from Monash University's Centre for Population and Urban Research found "83 per cent of the forecast increase in carbon emissions from 2000 to 2020 is attributable to population growth". Contradictorily, we are attempting to cut emissions by 5 per cent by 2020. This strategy means our target is actually more like a 25 per cent reduction in per capita terms, to achieve just 5 per cent in total. If 25 per cent is anywhere near achievable, imagine what we could do with a stable population! No wonder the Australian government is in climate change denial. Our government is still in the big "growth" fixation, rather than willing to admit it's time to slow down and face reality. No wonder Australia pulled a triple bad start of the UN climate change conference at Warsaw by being awarded Fossil of the Day on the summit’s first day. The award is given by the international Climate Action Network to the country which has done the most to block progress at the climate change negotiations on that day.

It questions the assertion in the letter it is responding to that Sydney is an "International city" therefore a destination for the whole world. That assertion was supposed to make us all re-think Sydney and in our minds throw it away as part of Australia. The first letter suited the SMH and this one negates the "don't care" attitude it was meant to engender. On top of that it spells out the economic downside of population growth and we can't have that.

Since when did Sydney rescind from Australia's sovereignty and become an "international city", as assumed by Stephen Hegedus? (letters 18/11). This generation should not have to lower expectations of home ownership
and living standards, what was enjoyed by previous generations.

If Manhattan is an example of unaffordable housing, then this is what we need to avoid, not celebrate!

The problem is the Ponzi housing and economic growth scheme, supported and promoted by our governments. While it's easy to point the finger at the greed of investors, and the GFC, they all exacerbate the public's
slide down the Ponzi of endless population growth, and the privileges it gives to the investors and bankers at the pyramid's apex. Such pyramid schemes thrive on accumulating more and more victims, adding to homelessness, debt, unemployment, costs of living and intergenerational declines in life's expectations.

A stable population would level out the costs of housing, and ensure that future generations are not denied the well-being, living standards and opportunities enjoyed by past generations.

Kangaroos and other wildlife are being forced off their lands, and killed cruelly by on-going human occupation - and various forms of land use. They are hounded and mercilessly being forced out of living in their own country. The cost of feral animals, and livestock for agricultural use, is massive. Property developers are some of the worst land-grabbers, with their concrete and housing construction. People then bring in their pets, vehicles, and lethal baggage, to the detriment of kangaroos - and then accused of causing car crashes and being in "plague" proportions!

Mother Agnes and the ‘liberal’ hawks out to silence her

of 20 November 2013 by Neil Clark on Russia Today

Just when you thought the ‘liberal interventionists’ and neo-cons couldn’t stoop any lower, they just have.

The ‘pro-free speech’ but actually very anti-free speech bullies have got a new target. A 61-year old nun called Mother Agnes-Mariam who has been living in Syria for twenty years and who runs a campaign called Mussahala (Reconciliation).

For the West‘s ‘liberal hawks’ and serial interventionists, this elderly lady, who is working tirelessly for peace and an end to the bloodshed in Syria, has become Public Enemy Number One.

Mother Agnes has been subject to a vicious internet campaign of character assassination, smears and defamation. We’ve been told that she is an ‘Assad apologist,’ ‘Assad‘s favourite nun’- she has even been called ‘the Syrian equivalent of one of Hitler’s brown priests’.

When the liberal hawks and serial warmongers saw that Mother Agnes had been invited to speak at the forthcoming international conference of Stop the War, they had a collective hissy fit.

...

of 17 November 2013 by Neil Clark

‘Investigative Journalist’ Scahill Takes Swipe at Mother Agnes

of 17 November 2013 by Richard Edmondson

Jeremy Scahill, the “investigative journalist” who once publicly expressed his belief in the official 9/11 story, says he won’t take part in an international antiwar conference scheduled for later this month if he has to share the same platform with Syrian nun Mother Agnes.

...

The scale of suffering in after the Philippines typhoon has been worsened by the fivefold increase in the population since 1950, from less than 19 million then to almost 100 million today - many of them living in vulnerable coastal zones. One hectare of mangroves in the Philippines can yield 400 kilos of fish, shrimps, crabmeat, molluscs and sea cucumbers annually, and help feed a further 400 kilos of fish and 75 kilos of shrimps that mature elsewhere. Mangroves of Bangladesh remain largely unaffected over the years. On the contrary, Pakistan, Thailand, Myanmar, and Philippines continued to suffer the loss of mangroves. With a disappearing rate of more than 2% per year, particularly mangroves in Pakistan and Myanmar remain critically threatened. The unmet need for voluntary family planning among the Philippines' poor has been high, leading many women and adolescents to become pregnant earlier and more often than they intend. On average, the country's poorest women have two more children than they say they want. The fertility rates among the poor are nearly three times higher than among the country's rich, who have for years enjoyed access to family planning through private providers. Philippine President Benigno Aquino late last year signed the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012. To poor women in the Philippines, this means that government health centers will have to make reproductive health education, maternal health care and contraceptives available to everyone. It is a life-saving measure that will help end the cycle of poverty in this Southeast Asia island nation. The good news is that more Filipino couples are now practicing family planning, therefore slowing the growth rate of the country's population, an official of the Commission on Population (PopCom) said. The PopCom support the implementation of the reproductive health (RH) law will further slow down the country's population growth rate.

The single biggest contributing factor to the increase in devastation brought by natural disasters in recent years is the rapid growth of the world’s population. Particularly in developing countries such as the Philippines, urban areas are hugely overpopulated meaning more people are naturally in the ‘firing zone’ when disasters strike. Global population is set to rise to 8 or 9 billion by 2050, and more people will be living in crowded and cramped housing in more extreme places, vulnerable to climate change and weather extremes. Scientists largely agree that it appears that storms will become more powerful as the climate changes. The problems of Philippines are poor urban planning, an exploding population, climate change and systemic poverty – all contributing factors to the death and destruction left in the super typhoon's wake. The population was very high where the storm made landfall so with those two facts alone would create a potential for a disaster. Not surprising is the little in the media about the role massive overpopulation, and that plays in this disaster--too many people in too small an area with limited resources is a huge reason contributing to the loss of life. Mangrove regeneration in Northern Samar, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) north of the worst-hit Philippine city of Tacloban, helped minimise damage from the Nov. 8 storm, according to the Trowel Development Foundation, which oversaw the plantings. According to the WWF, Mangrove forests are one of the world’s most threatened tropical ecosystems. More than 35% of the world’s mangroves are already gone. The figure is as high as 50% in countries such as India, the Philippines, and Vietnam, while in the Americas they are being cleared at a rate faster than tropical rainforests.

Sign the PETITION: Forcechange Dear Greyhound Racing NSW Chief Executive Brent Hogan, A recent inquiry into Australia’s greyhound racing industry uncovered mass euthanasia, mistreatment, drugging, and neglect toward dogs. As the world’s largest dog racing industry, it is imperative that Australia’s standards for treatment are improved and enforced. Over 3000 greyhounds per year are euthanized after being deemed unprofitable, while only 52 have been adopted into family homes. Reasons for this mass euthanasia span from injuries to simply being not fast enough to race. Some injured dogs are given pain-killing narcotics and forced to race anyway, which causes further detriment to an injury and could result in permanent disability. Other dogs are given performance-enhancing drugs such as hormones, or conventional drugs such as cocaine, caffeine, or amphetamines which are unlikely to show up on a test of a dog’s blood. Like in humans, these drugs can have adverse effects on the cardiovascular and nervous systems. Veterinarians report that many dogs surrendered by the racing industry arrive in poor condition. Female dogs grow feeble after birthing too many puppies, while others show signs of neglect and starvation. Some even require emergency treatment – one dog lost its eye after an angry owner hit it with a belt buckle. I demand that tighter regulations be imposed to cut down on Australia’s dog racing cruelty. Fewer dogs should be bred per year to cut down on the rate of unwanted dogs, while more funds should be allotted to adoption programs and shelters that take in the industry’s unwanted dogs. Owners that neglect and force drugs upon their dogs should immediately lose their ability to race and breed greyhounds. Sincerely, [Your Name Here]

As the 50th anniversary of JFK's murder on 22 November approached, the mainstream media (msm) and phony alternate media, could no longer, with any credibility, continue to ignore the late President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. In 1991 Oliver Stone, for a while, awakened interest from the broader public in Kennedy with his epic movie JFK starring Kevin Costner. Costner played Jim Garrison (1921-1992) the District Attorney of Orleans Parish, who tried to bring the murderers of JFK to justice and, upon whose book, On the Trail of the Assassins, JFK is based.

Since then, the msm recommenced its disappearance of President Kennedy, who if nothing else, was handsome, glamorous, witty and charming. At 43 years of age upon his inauguration in January 1962, he was the youngest ever President of the United States. Any other former President with those qualities and nothing else, would have been written about extensively in the msm in past decades. Instead, his story was forgotten except for the occasional sensationalised reporting of alleged sexual indiscretions by Kennedy.

In recent weeks, a supposed 'commemoration' of the approaching 50th anniversary has begun by amongst others, Australia's SBS television, consisting mostly of 'documentaries' which conceal most of the important facts about him and his murder. Instead, they focus on his romance with Jacqueline and trivial controversies. One such 'controversy' is Australian detective Colin McLaren's theory that the fatal shot came from a car directly behind the President. His 192 page book, which addresses not one of the other controversies of the day nor anything else about President Kennedy, contains no section of other works on the assassination of Kennedy. Why the SBS considers credible any 'researcher' who has not referred to the many other published works on Kennedy's assassination is not clear.

To the contrary, Russia Today published in a country, which was three times saved from the devastation of nuclear war by President Kennedy's courage, have begun to make known the true significance of JFK and the conspiracy to murder him. The article is 50yrs after JFK assassination: Choose your side in war on freedom of 18 Nov 2013 by former BBC journalist Tony Gosling.

One other site on which credible reporting of the 50th anniversary is to be found is Global Research (GR) although I feel that the issue deserves more prominence by GR. The republished review of James Douglass's excellent JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters is most helpful.

I watched the program about greyhounds and the lasting image for me was that a dog could be wagging its tail one minute and a few minutes later it had been drained of blood, its dead body mere refuse. Apart from the exploitation and cruelty to the dogs, what is this doing to the psyches of the veterinary nurses who do this work? The ABC ran a show last night the horrors of Surabaya Zoo. Images were the mixed species version of the Rake's Progress to Bedlam. Worse. It was appalling. I knew about it already from a friend who has lived in Indonesia, for many years. Animals in shocking condition crammed in to tiny, filthy cages, malnourished, poisoned even with food contaminated with formaldahide. Animals Australia has put in enormous efforts on behalf of exported live cattle but still it goes on. The horrors of human treatment of animals is overwhelmingly terrible and it is hard to know where to start in changing anything. Somewhere I guess is the answer.

On a separate issue, I feel I must defend the honour of demographers and economists. Rarely has a task given me less pleasure because in the main, both vocations warrant the criticism levelled at the start of Sheila's post. Having said that, there have been some notable exceptions in both categories that deserve a favourable mention. [Candobetter.net ed: The writer - a serial spammer - placed a link to an online handbag sales site, which we removed. He did not provide any notable demographers or economists. Of course, they do exist, but they don't get publicity in the mainstream media. We have published articles by economists on candobetter.net. We will publish sensible articles and comments on reform in democracy, environment, population, land use planning and energy policy from anyone or any discipline as long as there is no contravention of the law. We do not censor. If a person wants to argue with our main thrust, if they submit, for instance, a growthist propaganda article, we are more likely to publish them as a comment than an article, and to argue their points. This is because the mainstream press already provides wall-to-wall growthist propaganda.]

Government negotiators and observers reacted with dismay at Japan's announcement that it will aim for a 3.8-percent cut in emissions by 2020 from 2005 levels, replacing a more ambitious goal to slash them by 25 percent from 1990 levels. Japan's new target amounts to a 3 per cent rise from 1990 levels, a sharp reversal from the 25 per cent reduction target. Hiroshi Minami, Japan's chief negotiator at UN climate change talks in Warsaw, says the nuclear shutdown has forced the country to lower its "ambition level." Japan takes 39.3% of Australia’s black coal exports – the largest share, with a total of 115.3 million tonnes exported last financial year. The majority of Australia's thermal coal exports, mainly used for power generation, go to Japan. Australia can hardly be surprised by this revelation! Australia is actively promoting and exporting climate change! Coal mining for export is causing significant local and regional environmental impacts and increasing greenhouse gas emissions. Australia will eventually compete with Qatar as the largest LNG exporter by 2020 as two-thirds of global investments in liquefied natural gas will all be placed in the country. Energy-related greenhouse gas emission is predicted to reach a 20 per cent increase to 37.2 gigatonnes by 2035. ''Some people talk about the 'green growth' in Asia. several Asian countries so far have been impressive and replicable and the region's commitment to low-carbon green growth represents a move away from the old economic thinking of "grow first and clean later." However, emerging Asia's carbon emissions remain high and failure to act swiftly could increase mitigation costs by two to five times and lock in a high-carbon footprint for decades to come. "Green" and "growth" are contradictions in terms! World Energy Outlook 2011 warns that by 2017 all CO2 emissions permitted for the world to meet the Cancun Agreement's two degree warming goal will be already "locked-in" by existing power plants, factories and buildings. Japan's environment-friendly technological advances, and slow economic growth, indicates that the country may still emerge as a world leader in reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. Thanks to its ageing population, it’s CO2 output will reduce automatically without targets.

Thank you for this informative and insightful article. I can see the Syrian armed forces, along with the rest of Syria, are paying a terrible price to defend their country against sadistic killer proxies of the United States and its allies. 42,000 (27,000 +15,000) military dead alone over two and a half years exceeds Australia's death toll during the same period of time in that largely pointless conflict known as the First World War. Fortunately, unlike Syria, Australia suffered few civilian casualties in the First World War, whilst the total Syrian dead so far number 120,000 according to one source. World Peace will only be possible if the criminal leaders in countries which have supported these crimes against Syria are held to account.

The Age reveals that first home buyers made up a record low 12.2 per cent of new housing loan commitments in Victoria in September, a sharp fall from the peak of 31.6 per cent in May 2009. ''I can see the difficulties for young and first home buyers of getting into the market,'' said shadow treasurer Chris Bowen, who labelled the affordability crisis a serious national issue. It's interesting that we now have a Shadow Treasurer, the previous minister for Immigration under Labor, commenting on the blowout of the housing bubble, who is seeing the evidence of high rates of immigration - and loose borders that allow foreign investors to strangle the real estate market. Economist Saul Eslake, a member of the National Housing Supply Council, said vested interests from property owners and politicians meant policies that could support first home buyers - such as the abolishment of negative gearing and lower costs for new developments - were unlikely to ever see the light of day. The housing Ponzi scheme is being driven and manipulated by investors, who create and guarantee their portfolios delivered by high rates of population growth and heavy support for domestic and foreign investors. Booming housing market leaves first home buyers behind, says Chris Bowen All Ponzi schemes eventually collapse. Back in February 2012, Deakin University’s Philip Soos said that the only thing that prevented Australian house prices from crashing during the 2008 GFC was the first-home owners’ boost, who believes the sector is now operating like a Ponzi scheme. According to Soos, the tipping point for the mark will come when “the household sector is so overloaded with debt there exist no more ‘greater fools’ willing to commit to a lifetime of debt serfdom to purchase property”. Australian housing a Ponzi scheme and the housing bubble will burst Sooner or later you run out of unsuspecting new investors and the whole thing collapses. The end of the housing bubble will hurt our economy, but it's time to make the transition to a real and productive economy, rather than the predatory one of mortgages, accumulating more and more potential buyers (victims) into the scheme, and the strangle-hold property developers.

Kevin Rudd resigned from parliament, with his apology to the Stolen Generations as the highlight of his prime-ministership, predictably saying it was time he gave something back to his family. Mr Rudd said that as prime minister he navigated Australia through the great financial crisis without a recession or mass unemployment, and maintained the nation's AAA credit rating. His population growth drive probably was the band-aid that plastered over the cracks in our economy. It's a no-brainer, quick-fix to economic stimulus, if one ignores the ongoing costs of growth. The Kyoto Protocol on climate change was ratified, WorkChoices overhauled, the so-called Pacific solution dismantled and an apology issued to the Stolen Generations. He staged stimulus that worked very well in the face of the GFC. Although many observers have a philosophical objection to giving away cash, households spent it with abandon. Kevin Rudd's 2010 declaration of support of a "Big Australia" followed the federal Treasury's Intergenerational Report that "predicted" Australia's population would rise from about 22 million to 35.9 million in 2050. Rather than "predict", Rudd actually planned to engineer it. Thanks to his no-apologetic support for "big Australia", Labor privileged housing markets as a protected asset class, and used it as mechanism for economic reform, and support for the privileged. The demand for housing ensured that prices sky-rocketed, and the number of homeless overwhelmed shelters - despite Rudd's time as homeless himself as a child. The rush to property speculation which prevents the RBA from lowering interest rates enough to bring down the dollar. Rudd's popularity dipped dramatically in 2009 and 2010, and caucus elected Julia Gillard in his place. She assured the public that she didn't want Australia to rush into "big Australia", but a sustainable one. She appointed Tony Burke as Minister for Sustainable population. She later back-flipped and promoted ongoing high rates of growth! ''I support a population that our environment, our water, our soil, our roads and freeways, our buses, our trains and our services can sustain.'' Tony Abbott had warned in the 2010 debate that Australian cities were ''choking'' and that population was growing ''in an out-of-control and unsustainable way''. We are yet to hear of a broader immigration policy from Abbott. Kevin Rudd pursued his climate change agenda with the original CPRS legislation. Rudd claimed that climate change was not just an environmental challenge. Climate change he described as an economic challenge, a social challenge, and actually represents a big challenge on the overall question of national security. His government ratified the Kyoto protocol on climate change, and promised overhauls of health funding and industrial relations. However, Rudd failed to allow the then climate change minister Penny Wong to bring a proper discussion to the full cabinet at Copenhagen conference. There's no way of hiding the link between rising greenhouse gas emissions, and anthropogenic climate change! Kevin Rudd's most enduring legacy was the rise and rise of vested interests, which was not in the national interest but not in certain sectional interests. With heightened immigration rates, the rush to form bogus "colleges" to gain PR meant that overnight we had "skills shortages" of hair dressers, cooks, chefs and a sundry array of other lesser skilled jobs. At present growth rates of close to 2%, Australia’s population will reach 42 million by 2050, six million more than the Federal government’s 2010 Intergenerational Report’s projection, and is a policy he publicly supported in the last weeks of Rudd’s Prime Ministership.

Whilst Sir Michael Jagger, since he was knighted in 2002 may not have been particularly outspoken against war and injustice, he and his band were notably outspoken against the Vietnam War in the 1960's. In this spirit, the embedded video of their 1969 hit Gimme Shelter features many images of the US Government's murderous war against the Vietnamese, Cambodian and Lao people in which at least 3 million died. There are also other images of other controversial political issues including the Blockade of Cuba and 9/11. The first image in this video is of President John F. Kennedy who tried to end the Vietnam before he was murdered 50 years ago on 22 November 1963.

Editor's Note (29/1/2022): To understand why the above Video of the Rolling Stones' "Gimme Shelter" has been made unavailable, please read Universal Music Group and YouTube Agree to Forget About Fair Use (27/6/2014) | Public Knowledge by Michael Weinberg:

Today Public Knowledge artist-in-residence Elisa Kreisinger unveiled a new blog post detailing how Universal Music Group (UMG) and YouTube turned their backs on fair use. You should read her full story here, but the short version is that YouTube and UMG agreed to let UMG take down videos, even videos making fair use of UMG music. That means that UMG could take down videos that did not infringe on UMG copyrights.

Normally, UMG would only be able to take down videos that could infringe on UMG controlled music. Elisa believes that her mashup video makes fair use of UMG music, and therefore does not infringe on any UMG copyrights. While the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) allows a host like YouTube to keep showing a video if the creator asserts fair use, in this case YouTube decided to ignore Elisa’s argument and let UMG take the video down.

Obviously, this is a problem. The DMCA notice-and-takedown rules were specifically designed to allow intermediaries like YouTube to host controversial content without fear of copyright liability as long as they stayed out of judgment about what did and did not infringe copyright.

Fair use prevents rightsholders from silencing critics with the threat of a copyright infringement lawsuit. By giving UMG the ability to take down videos that use their content regardless of fair use, YouTube has given UMG sweeping power to control what is – and is not – said about UMG and UMG artists. UMG should not be asking for this kind of power, and YouTube should not be granting it.

This agreement also highlights a growing – and troubling – trend in the world of copyright. Rightsholders (and some government officials) have increasingly been calling for “voluntary agreements” to increase rightsholder control and the obligations of intermediaries. The agreement between YouTube and UMG shows what happens when big industry players are brought together to work something out: users lose. Large rightsholders use the voluntary agreement frameworks to undermine key user rights. While things like fair use matter a lot to individual users, it may not be worth it for either side to insist that fair use is protected in a voluntary agreement. Users only realize what happened when something they relied upon – like fair use – suddenly disappears from important platforms.

Fortunately, there is an alternative way to address copyright’s problems. Instead of pulling big players into a back room to cut a deal, we can use the actual legislative process. While no process is perfect, reforming copyright through the legislative process gives the public, users, and smaller content creators an opportunity to participate. It increases the likelihood the improvements will benefit everyone, not just the largest commercial parties.

Our copyright system is in dire need of fixing, but private agreements are no substitute for real policy fixes. As Elisa’s case vividly illustrates, when private agreements undermine fundamental parts of the law everyone except the biggest players lose.

The extraordinarily detailed information on negotiating positions released by WikiLeaks shows Australia repeatedly backing the interests of the US against the objections of countries including Canada, New Zealand, Japan, Singapore and Vietnam on questions involving intellectual property. The Trans Pacific Partnership is the largest-ever economic treaty, encompassing nations representing more than 40 per cent of the world’s GDP. Details of secret trade negotiations that could leave Australians paying more for drugs and medicines, movies, computer games and software, and be placed under surveillance as part of a US-led crackdown on internet piracy. Intellectual property experts are critical of the draft treaty, which they say would help the multinational movie and music industries, software giants and pharmaceutical manufacturers to maintain and increase prices by reinforcing the rights of copyright. It would cause online "piracy" to challenge corporate rights to music and software, and block the sales of generic medicine. It's about accumulating the corporate powers globally, and overwhelming the rights of governments, individual choices, and our sovereignty. Canada and seven other countries want to make it clear that internet providers such as Australia's iiNet cannot be held legally responsible for copyright infringement on their networks. In 2012 iiNet went to the High Court to enforce that right. But Australia and the US are listed in the negotiating document as opposing it. The TPP is the forerunner to the equally secret US-EU pact TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership), for which President Obama initiated US-EU negotiations in January 2013. Together, the TPP and TTIP will cover more than 60 per cent of global GDP. Read the Wikileaks press release here on the Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)

The kind of shameful treatment of English Children forcibly taken from their natural mothers and forcibly deported to Australia from the 1950's until the 1980's was alsi inlflictded upon many Irish children as the YouTube broadcast of Calre Daly's recent speech to the Irish Parliament shows.
In the speech Clare Daly asks that children, who have been taken from their parents by the Irish state and adopted by other parents, be given help locating their natural parents and that parents seeking to contact their children be similarly helped.

Tracing Rights

10.30am tomorrow morning in Court 12, Ground Floor, 210 William Street, Melbourne.

Tomorrow, Wednesday 13 November 2013, Boroondara Council is taking VCAT to the Supreme Court over a decision

It involved a heritage listed house in a heritage area, where apparently the heritage value was ignored and they approved it to be pulled down and to build a great big block of concrete and glass flats.

This will be a big test of the value of heritage and there might be some of you with time and interest to go and listen to the arguments.

The decision will have great importance to many.

The hearing will commence at 10.30am tomorrow morning in Court 12, Ground Floor, 210 William Street, Melbourne.

The Napthine government is facing intense pressure to open Victoria to onshore gas exploration, despite CSG mining being incompatible with agriculture. It would mean ignoring farming communities to give preference to mining companies. Such are the manipulative lobbying powers of gigantic and financially-powerful corporations that they are able to pressure governments for their own financial advantage - contrary to the welfare and concerns of local communities. The LNG industry claims to be Australia's fastest growing export sector. Companies are refusing to profitably sell gas in domestic markets today so that the gas can be reserved, or hoarded, for sale in 15 or 20 years as LNG for the export market. In Queensland, Australian industry gas users such as Orica and Alcoa have called for governments to reserve gas supplies for domestic use before the $70 billion suite of LNG export projects. Western Australia - the only state that forces gas developers to set aside reserves -drove a 10 per cent jump in prices compared to a year ago. In another industry push, they say that Australia can avoid gas supply shortages by expanding operations at offshore and coal seam gas fields, according to the Australian Pipeline Industry Association. However, it won't make the gas any cheaper. Hoarding supplies guarantees higher prices! Now, the industry claims that Australia can avoid gas supply shortages by expanding operations offshore, and through coal seam gas fields. Instead of providing much needed cheap natural gas to Australian homes and industry, the industry is giving preference to overseas markets, and higher prices. Nationals leader Peter Ryan has warned that he will oppose onshore gas production if it impacts negatively on the rural environment, water supply and agricultural production. Despite having one of the largest gas production booms in the country, we could end up with a "shortage" of natural gas - and be forced to explore coal seam gas sources!

The people who are trying to force Melburnians to travel further, and by car at extortionate cost, whilst destroying what little is left of the Royal Park, belong behind bars.

To add injury to insult, the Coalition government is to "streamline" government spending by axing 600 jobs at the CSIRO. The anti-science brigade will compromise their ability to manage bushfires, staff say. Acting Opposition Leader Ms Plibersek says the staff reduction is another blow for research and technology in Australia after the Government failed to appoint a science minister. If the government really wanted to cut back on public service staff, it should be by streamlining governments, and the number of overlapping politicians and the three tiers of government. All the anti-science flies in the face of the chronic "skills shortage", and the justification for mass immigration, that's undemocratically imposed on our nation.

Video released by animal rights group Animals Australia shows bulls exported from Australia to Mauritius being dragged head-first off trucks on to concrete and being kicked and trussed before having their throats slit in the street. The footage shows bulls being roped at the neck and pulled off a small livestock truck without a ramp, then dragged on the ground of a feedlot by more than seven men during the festival of sacrifice in October. One bull's horn was broken when it was forced off the truck while another had water thrown over it to make it stand up. The bulls were hog-tied, including one that had its two front legs stamped on before six men held it down while another slaughtered the bull after two attempts to slash its throat. The Age: New video of Australian animals being mistreated in Mauritius alarms activists The exporter responsible is already under investigation for breaches of the live export supply chain assurance scheme, for cruelty in Kuwait. In an act of defiance and cruelty, Federal Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce is planning to actually water down live export rules put in place after the live export ban to Indonesia in 2011. The WA Liberals are also set to vote on a motion at their State conference at the weekend to remove "red tape" from the live export system. Removing inhibiting "red tape" would free-up the supply chain, and allow more atrocities. Rather than dieting to lose morbid obesity, it's a denial of reality by actually loosening the belt! More animals will be cruelly sent to third world countries, ostensibly to help their "food security", and suffer in the hand of barbarians and savages! Animals Australia said the latest incident was evidence that the live export system should not be weakened. How much blood do our politicians have on their hands? Rather than patches, they will be knee-deep in the filth!

Swiss to vote on 2,500 franc basic income for every adult http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/04/us-swiss-pay-idUSBRE9930O62013... BERNE | Fri Oct 4, 2013 10:55am EDT (Reuters) - Switzerland will hold a vote on whether to introduce a basic income for all adults, in a further sign of growing public activism over pay inequality since the financial crisis. A grassroots committee is calling for all adults in Switzerland to receive an unconditional income of 2,500 Swiss francs ($2,800) per month from the state, with the aim of providing a financial safety net for the population. Organizers submitted more than the 100,000 signatures needed to call a referendum on Friday and tipped a truckload of 8 million five-rappen coins outside the parliament building in Berne, one for each person living in Switzerland. Under Swiss law, citizens can organize popular initiatives that allow the channeling of public anger into direct political action. The country usually holds several referenda a year. In March, Swiss voters backed some of the world's strictest controls on executive pay, forcing public companies to give shareholders a binding vote on compensation. A separate proposal to limit monthly executive pay to no more than what the company's lowest-paid staff earn in a year, the so-called 1:12 initiative, faces a popular vote on November 24. The initiative's organizing committee said the basic income could partly be financed through money from social insurance systems in Switzerland. The timing of the vote has yet to be announced, pending official guidance from the government. (Reporting by Denis Balibouse, writing by Alice Baghdjian, editing by Gareth Jones)

Victorian Planning Minister Matthew Guy has set out new rules for three zones into which each local council must divide their area. ''Residential growth'' zones enable the highest levels of new housing growth near train lines, shopping strips and the like. ''General residential'' zones are to be used in most residential areas to preserve urban character while enabling moderate housing growth. Finally, ''neighbourhood residential'' zones tightly restrict housing growth. Fortunately, Glen Eira and Boroondara councils have got in early, exploiting this weakness, or loophole in the legislation, to declare that they don't want all this growth! Glen Eira council has zoned about 80 per cent of residential land to restrict growth in housing. Similarly, Boroondara is seeking approval to restrict growth in about 80 per cent of residential land. Only 1 per cent of residential land in Boroondara is proposed for the residential growth zone, and just 19 per cent for the general residential zone, despite state government guidance that this should be used in most residential areas. Why should they have their suburbs re-engineered to lose their neighborhood character, and amentiies, and welcome more people? The Age: Councils opt for NIMBY approach on growth The article assumes that Melbourne's ridiculously high rate of growth is inevitable, and will continue. It assumes that the rebel councils want the growth to go elsewhere - ie are NIMBYs. If this pattern of councils locking down most of their neighbourhoods continues, along with our third-world levels of population growth, nearly all new housing will be built in Melbourne's outer suburbs and on the urban fringe. Previous Grattan Institute research (Cities: who decides?) shows early, sustained involvement of residents in decision-making makes it possible to satisfy most people. Well, this is the result of the residents, and councils' decision - to avoid growth that's not in the interests of residents or Melbourne. There's nothing in the article about agreements on immigration levels, or that 60% or more of our population growth is from record levels of immigration- and thus not inevitable. It assumes that growth is "good" and desirable. Property development has become a major industry in Victoria, but the trailing costs of population growth far outweigh the economic benefits of the industry. Our economy needs to diversity, and rely more on quality, training, education, invention, innovation and skills rather than on quantity of people. The costs of population growth are compromising our living standards, locking young people out of housing, and the industry has far too much political power and support. The more we accommodate this socially-engineered population growth, due to unrealistic levels of immigration, the more the Federal government will turn on the immigration tap! The best athletes are the finely-tuned, well rehearsed and those not carrying too much excess baggage, such as body fat and slack muscles. What's needed for the challenges of the future is a finely-tunes, fit and educated and skilled population, not one that carrying excess "fat"- or an economy that's has population growth un-sustainably built-into it. There must be a circuit-breaker somewhere, and at least Councils are making headway in democracy.

The Warsaw climate summit is the first major round of United Nations climate change negotiations since the Abbott government took office. Countries are normally represented by ministers in the second week of major climate meetings. However, our government will not be represented by any senior member. The United Nations Framework convention on climate change will try to hammer out a new international agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions. It's unclear if the diplomats attending from Australia will be given a mandate for the meeting, to negotiate. The Australian climate change ambassador Dr Justin Lee will lead the delegation. Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has denied 25 years of climate change research and accused a UN executive secretary of the Framework Convention on Climate Change of "talking through her hat." Environment Minister Mr Hunt said he "looked up what Wikipedia" had written about bushfires and based his statements there. He said it was clear from Wikipedia that Australia's bushfires were "normal and frequent events". Former prime minister John Howard has poured scorn on the "alarmist" scientific consensus on global warming in a speech to a gathering of British climate skeptics, comparing those calling for action on climate change to religious zealots. No lay person would question peer-reviewed advancements in medical science, paleontology, archeology, zoology, or have the grounds to be highly dismissive and skeptical of new research findings and trends, but when it comes to climate science, it's too abstract, and can be dismissed with impunity as a religious belief without foundation? No wonder no politician will be at the UN climate change conference. Australia is locked into the economic-model of perpetual growth, and the "business as usual" drive of big population, high volume capitalistic markets, and the cornucopia myth of never-ending benefits for humanity! It's a pseudo-religion, one the defies empirical evidence. The "god" of human advancement, of benevolent Mother Nature, and human advancements technology will "save" humanity from any climatic hostility, scarcities, overpopulation and the planet's degradation, and Australia can continue to grow its population to up to 60 million people by 2050, and enjoy prosperity despite the constraints of climate change!

Dear Andrew I strongly support your efforts to stop the live animal export trade. I have just sent an email to Sen Barnaby Joyce in support of your efforts. Please know that thinking Australians do want this cruel trade to end. The animals have no say in what happens to them and it is up to us to ensure they are treated as live, sentient beings, deserving of respect. Please continue, in spite of the opposition you find in parliament. I find it hard to believe that any educated, thinking person could possibly think that sending live animals on long sea trips to slaughter houses in countries where there is no respect for animals, is an OK idea. It is obviously money that is talking. Bribery and corruption tends to be inherent in the countries of destination. Our society in Australia needs to show the world that we act on our principles and follow through with what we believe, rather than kow-towing to others' beliefs. Yours sincerely Helen B Carter

In an another attack on democracy, the Victorian Government has announced a major crackdown on opponents of duck hunting and logging. Our governments are becoming increasingly authoritian, and autocratic. Protesters in duck shooting areas will have their fines increased to a massive $8500, instead of $1400. It used to be $100 under Labor. If hunters are "harassed", there could be a fine of $3,500. The new highly protected species isn't the native waterbirds, but their human predators. They are highly valued Liberal voters, obviously! Duck rescuers are to stay 25 meters from hunters, for their "safety". Wearing bright gear, they are more safe than the hunters in their camouflage clothing. Similarly, the Government has also created new offences for breaching an exclusion order in logging zones, with similar penalties. Loggers are to be prized species, with higher protection than the native, and threatened, species they are eliminating. These "crackdowns" are more evidence that democracy and transparency are being eroded as our economic model of perpetual growth means whittling away of natural resources, and those who do it need more and more heavy-handed and draconian protection and support. The new "criminals" are the conservationists and animal activists - those who care about the environment, and native species. Victorian duck hunt protesters face massive penalty hike

A PROPOSAL to reduce the amount of dredging at the controversial $2 billion Abbot Point coal port from 3 million cubic metres to just 500,000 cubic metres has been rejected by the State Government. A departmental briefing to Environment Minister Andrew Powell which was uncovered in a Right to Information search says the port could go ahead with less dredging if the two jetties to be built were extended from 2.8km to 4km. Courier Mail: Plan to cut Abbot Point dredging rejected by State government The idea would likely have meant that dredge spoil could have been dumped onshore instead of in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. An assessment of the Reef released on Friday blamed agricultural and urban run-off rather than dredging for most damage. Population growth and increased urban run-off, and the "Asian Century", will ensure the threats continue to increase. The heavy dredging will simply put the nails in the coffin of the Great Barrier Reef's integrity. The briefing warns that dredge spoil material is moving much further and in much greater volumes than previously thought. If Abbot Point dredging was approved this year, it would enable supporting mine and rail developments to proceed, making coal export possible by 2017. Governments couldn't consciously be exporting coal if they accepted the science of climate change. "Science" is acceptable if it remains static and abstract, in journals and academic communities. If it impinges on our government's growth plans, and exports, then it becomes controversial and inconvenient - and must be denied!

Ivory and other body parts from African wildlife, and other parts of the world, means animals are being brutally hacked, killed and threatened by poachers. The new trend, to the delight of some graziers who resent the presence of native kangaroos, is that kangaroo testicles are considered an aphrodisiac! Kangaroo testicles are bound for China as a sex drug branded as a new aphrodisiac. According to popular online shopping websites, China has gone nuts over the tonic which sells for between $30-$150 for a bottle of 100 capsules. There's no scientific or rational basis for this belief, or no empirical evidence. Australian medical experts warn the drug, based on testosterone, is untested and without scientific data to support its claims of a super-sexed libido. Like rhino horns that's simply cartilage, like human fingernails, there's no evidence of it being medicinal in value. One label says that "the male kangaroo may mate with 40 female kangaroos and produces twice as much semen as a bull. Essence of Kangaroo is extremely potent as it is rich in natural hormones, proteins, zinc and iron, which are able to increase physical strength and enhance the sexual energy.'' If true, that doesn't mean this potency can be consumed! The myth that kangaroo breed in "plague" proportions is being propagated, when their joey death rate is very high. The kangaroo killing commercial industry won't refute the science, or evidence to the contrary, if they are making money from the body parts of kangaroos - our nation's icon! Kangaroo testicles a hit with Chinese as aphrodisiac

UNESCO, which oversees the world heritage status of the Great Barrier Reef, has already voiced concern that the port developments might put the area on its ''endangered'' list. While their report has given some weight to the role dredging and port developments play in the state of the reef, it highlighted more urgent concerns from nutrient run-off, climate change and the crown of thorns starfish. No port developments should be permitted outside the existing major port areas, it said. Queensland Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney said it was important for decisions about the reef to be based on scientific facts, not "alarmist claims" by environmental groups that can't be verified. Environmental groups remain concerned about the impact of proposed dredging projects near the reef, including the Abbot Point proposal due for a decision next month. Environment Minister Mr Hunt said he was encouraged by ''new science'' that could prove more effective in combating the crown-of-thorns starfish infestations that were killing coral. New programs to stop run-off from farms would also make a difference, he said. His "new science" sounds more like a denial of traditional science, based on observation, empirical evidence and obvious conclusions. This "new science" what our present day politicians are committed to and is the attitude towards climate change! Crown-of-thorns starfish are responsible for 42 per cent of the coral damage. Storms account for 48 per cent of the degradation and bleaching accounts for the remainder. The assessment found seagrass meadows had also been affected, hurting populations of dugongs and turtles. SMH: Fears for reef over port development If Abbot point goes ahead as planned it will be the largest coal export port on the planet, and if Mackay goes ahead it will be the second biggest port coal on the planet. And the Whitsundays lie in the middle. The $6.2 billion expansion of the coal port would see four additional coal terminals built; which would provide an extra annual capacity of 120 million tonnes and would support the developments in the Bowen, Surat, and Galilee Basins of Queensland. Tourists don't want to see destroyed coasts and bygone natural treasures, and marine wildlife will be killed or turned away. This generation shouldn't bear the guilt of having destroyed an world-heritage area, and future generations will be condemning us in retrospect. There's little compatibility between capitalistic economic growth, and long term conservation. There's no ultimate point of having a thriving and successful coal-mining industry if we lose a world-heritage natural treasure- worth more than any billions from dirty coal extraction and export.

The government should take a warning from the recent Miranda electorate by-election, southern Sydney, October 19th. It was a blue-ribbon Liberal electorate, but they proved that the voters can't be taken for granted. Greens candidate Mr Murray Scott said: "For too long, state governments have been working hand-in-hand with the big developers, saying the only way to increase Sydney's population is to build Hong Kong-style apartment towers in place of much-loved garden suburbs. "The government is proposing aggressive new planning laws designed to take powers from local councils, increase state government intervention and [to] weaken environmental planning standards..." "This is a direct breach of its 2011 pre-election promise to undo Labor's rotten planning changes and return planning powers to local councils." http://www.theleader.com.au/story/1845253/miranda-voters-head-to-the-pol... (Pity the Greens don't have a implementable population policy!). Many people seem to be irritated about Sports and Recreation Minister Graham Annesley. But also, concerns about over-development (Libs on local council raised height restrictions on new developments and changed residential densities). Labor was running on an over-development platform, with Barry Collier. Collier was a lawyer and former school teacher before entering parliament, and while he never rose from the back bench, he established his local popularity when the government backed down on a plan to build the Southern Freeway through the electorate. NSW Opposition Leader John Robertson says the swing of about 27 per cent against the Liberals is believed to be the largest ever recorded at a NSW by-election - is a warning to the Liberal government. The government had to recognise the level of concern about over-development, Sutherland Hospital needs, fire stations closures and TAFE cuts. "The people of Miranda sent a strong message by voting against the cuts to local hospitals, train services and fire stations," Opposition Leader Mr Robertson said.

A STATEMENT ON LATEST ANIMAL CRUELTY REVELATIONS The Independent Member for Denison, Andrew Wilkie, will discuss the latest revelation of cruelty in Australia’s live animal export trade, this time the live sheep trade to Jordan. WHEN: 12.30pm 31 October WHERE: Parliament House Lawns Hobart “I’m beyond asking how many more episodes of animal cruelty are needed before the Australian Government shuts down the live export trade,” Mr Wilkie said. “The Government simply doesn’t care about the trade being systemically cruel, not being in Australia’s economic self-interest and lacking popular support. “The latest episode in Jordan shows again the cruelty routinely metered out to Australian livestock sent overseas. It joins a very long list of exposé?s by Animal Australia and others in countries as diverse as Turkey, Israel, Egypt, Pakistan and of course repeatedly in Indonesia. “In this case the Government must identify the Australian exporter and come down on it like a ton of bricks. “To allow the trade to continue in the full knowledge that it is systemically cruel makes the Australian Government every bit as guilty as any individual found guilty in Australia of cruelty to animals. “I remain committed to progress a Private Member’s Bill in the new Parliament to wind up the trade.” AT least Andrew Wilkie is very concerned about the ongoing animal cruelty and will continue to campaign to end live animal exports. To this end he will be introducing a Private Member’s Bill to the Parliament when it resumes. Contact form for Senator Banaby Joyce

Yesterday I wrote to the Minister for Agriculture, Barnaby Joyce. The electronic copy has been lost but I made the following points to him. Whilst the government allows the live animal export trade, knowing that the result can well be very inhumane treatment, in fact bloodthirsty sadistic torture the government is a party to the end result. Whilst Mr. Joyce has acknowledged that the treatment is not too good therefore can be assumed not to condone it, it is really even worse if he does not condone it but allows this trade to continue. He is turning a blind eye! The answer to this moral question would have been obvious to me when I was in primary school. I would hope it would still be clear to primary school children but with examples like Mr. Joyce in parliament how long can our ethical standards endure? Mr. Joyce said he cannot police what goes in the rest of the world. That is true, therefore he needs to keep things within is area of control. The other aspect of the harm inflicted by this industry is the effect on Australians hearing about, knowing and seeing what happens to these animals, knowing that our own government is a party to it and that it is intransigent on the issue. I would consider this to be traumatizing. It traumatizes me every time I hear about it. I cannot watch the footage of suffering animals but I get the picture from reading about it and knowing that there is footage. Maintaining the live animal export industry is doing us all harm as well as the poor animals. It has to be debasing our psyche.

Animals Australia video footage was gathered during the Eid al-Adha, or Festival of Sacrifice, in Jordan in mid October. It has been sent to the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and shows sheep being dragged along the ground, thrown into car boots and carved open at the throat. In one scene, four dying sheep lie twitching in an open street alongside the still body of a fifth. Thousands of sheep have been released outside the ESCAS supply chain system that makes exporters responsible for them up to the point of slaughter. However, Federal Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce has ruled out stopping live exports to Jordan, saying such a move would only end up hurting Australian producers. There's more interest in the financial welfare of producers than the animals! Prime Minister Tony Abbott has described graphic footage of Australian sheep being brutally slaughtered in Jordan as "disturbing", but he has defended live exports as a "good system." We must wonder what a "bad system" for animals really would be like? How can it get any worse? When there's a lack of human rights, there's even more reason animals can be abused. Amnesty International has particular concerns about the application of the death penalty in Jordan because there is a pattern of death sentences, and sometimes executions, occurring as a result of unfair trials where confessions extracted under torture are used as evidence against the defendants. How are animals to be protected in such brutish regimes? When animals are concerned, industries can't simply brush aside ethics. These callous politicians have blood on their hands, and show how truly shallow their character are when they can over-look brutality and grotesque treatment of sentient animals. Animals Australia: Take action to ban live export

Well, this is a nice slap-in-the-face for democracy, isn't it? Couldn't be clearer, this message about telling the serfs to just shut up and swallow anything the lords dish out. Thank you Vivienne for bringing this to our attention.

This morning 31st October at 4:20am on ABC Radio with Michael Pavlich, Kelvin Thomson will be doing an extended interview on the issue of global population and Australia’s population growth. The interview will then be followed by talkback callers with questions and discussion for Kelvin. We understand the interview will be broadcast nationally and can also be listened to online. Details are as follows: - Tune in to your LOCAL ABC Radio frequency (eg in Melbourne 774am) to hear the interview - Or stream online and follow the prompts at http://www.abc.net.au/overnights/ - Talkback calls will be taken at 1300 800 222 - Send in texts during the interview at 0437 774 774 Although it is early, calling in will help raise the profile of our predicament with overpopulation. When you consider that all day long the ABC and other networks push population growth, it seems very unfair that the one lucid voice putting a counter argument, is to be aired at such an inaccessible hour.

I received the following from Jill Quirk:

Dear SPA member,

You may wish to listen to this program (see below) early tomorrow morning and you can ring in with your own view point.

Sincerely

Jill Quirk
President Sustainable Population Australia , Victoria and Tasmanian branch

Tomorrow morning Thursday 31st October at 420am on ABC Radio with Michael Pavlich, Kelvin Thomson will be doing an extended interview on the issue of global population and Australia’s population growth. The interview will then be followed by talkback callers with questions and discussion for Kelvin. We understand the interview will be broadcast nationally and can also be listened to online. Details are as follows:

— Tune in to your LOCAL ABC Radio frequency (eg in Melbourne 774am) to hear the interview

— Or stream online and follow the prompts at http://www.abc.net.au/overnights/

— Talkback calls will be taken at 1300 800 222

— Send in texts during the interview at 0437 774 774

What do the Australian Mining and Minerals Association, the Business Council of Australia, the Master Builders Association and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry have in common? They all think that their members, including large multinational companies, shouldn't have to advertise local jobs to Australian workers. They claim that they can’t find "skilled" workers locally. But how do they know if they don't even bother looking? And whatever happened to training workers and putting on apprentices? We ran a campaign which got the previous Federal Government to pass legislation that made it obligatory for employers to advertise jobs and prove no qualified Australian workers were available, before 457 visa workers can be approved. But the big end of town is now calling on the new Coalition Government to repeal this legislation, despite the fact that unemployment is rising. There are 714,100 people currently looking for work and our youth unemployment rate is at 12.6 per cent, its highest since 2002. Despite this, the Minister for Immigration, Scott Morrison has signalled he will consider removing this legal requirement, siding with big business instead of the hundreds of thousands of Australians looking for work. Join with CFMEU and tell Scott Morrison employers should have to advertise jobs to Australian workers first and get 457 visa workers only if they prove they can’t find a suitable Australian candidate. Why Mr Abbott should we put you first when you put local workers last?

Pages