Comments

The excuse for this is so-called 'democratic centralism'. Of course it is only centralism and not democracy. It means that decisions are made by a handful of elites within a party and everyone else has to go along with them. Copyright notice: Reproduction of this material is encouraged as long as the source is acknowledged.

The impression I got (from the Fin Rev a few weeks ago) was that Kevin Rudd was refusing to discuss policies and decisions even within cabinet; that he and one or two others were making huge decisions without going through due process. If that was true then he had to be removed. In fact, I suspect that this has been true of State Labor Premiers recently as well. I don't know if it has been true of the Libs. The State ALP governments and parties, when running for election, seem to forbid candidates to candidly discuss matters or give their own opinions. This is all appalling of course. Good on Gillard if she really has acted democratically. If this is true, she may go down in history as a good person, sorely needed, in bad times. Sheila Newman, population sociologist home page Copyright to the author. Please contact sheila [AT] candobetter org or the editor if you wish to make substantial reproduction or republish.

The explosive population growth we've seen in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and other predominately agrarian societies is due to most woman having large families of 4+ children. Now apologists for this behavior say "they don't have a choice! Large families have always been the norm there, they need them to work the fields and look after them in their old age." I don't buy this. Look at the growth rates prior to industiralization, when most people lived on the land. They were very slow, almost flat. This is not the sort of growth pattern you get where large families are the norm. If I'm correct, throughout history in any society large families have always been fairly rare and a luxury, not commonplace and a necessity.

My understanding of the sudden callous switch from Rudd to Gillard is that others (the so-called Faceless Men) seeing that some of Kevin's carraiges had left the track (through enormous long-term stress and strain, I believe) undermined him to such an extent that Julia, who engaged in no personal disloyalty at any time, had no choice but to collect the wheels and try to put the train back on track as best she could. I believe that she succeeded in this task. Although not primarily a Labor supporter, I believe that Julia has behaved honourably all the way through the crisis and that this should be acknowledged and recognised by everyone. Distortions, deceit, lies and general wickedness are best left the the experts in this field - the Liberals and their unscrupulous backers.

Hi Everyone - It is time to lodge our protests against the degradation of the Lovely Bald Hills Flats - now is the time to encourage the Brisbane City Council (BCC) to stand by its word to make Brisbane and Greener more Livable City - to do this we need to stop the Nielson application to destroy the flats. Editorial comment: The FaceBook page against the expansion of sand mining is here. I have been advised that those wishing to lodge objections to the expansion of sand mining have until 12 October to do so. We first wrote of this on candobetter in the article "Bald Hills community fights sand mining threat to flood plains and Moreton Bay" of 31 Aug 2009.

Tim, The growthist press will raise the profile of any woman who finds fault with her Ecomalthusian sisters. That doesn't mean that the Cornucopian 'feminist' is representative, only that she is represented more in the mainstream press, because her agenda dovetails with theirs. Think of all the worthy feminists who spear headed family planning, for instance: Brettena Smyth and Lillie Goodisson, in Australia; Marie Stopes, in the UK; Jeanne Humbert, in France; Margaret Sanger, in the US, about whom we have two articles at http://candobetter.org/node/995 and http://candobetter.org/node/994 etc etc But thanks anyway. You make good points. Sheila Newman, population sociologist home page Copyright to the author. Please contact sheila [AT] candobetter org or the editor if you wish to make substantial reproduction or republish.

Jenny Warfe has given unusually good appraisal of the election outcome and provides good suggestions to allow the elected independents and Greens to change Australia back into a proper democracy ruled by the people and not by vested interests pulling strings out of the public view. Nevertheless, it has to be remembered that the Murdoch press and the power elites of Australia have turned on Julia Gillard for having stood up against the dictatorship of former Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and for her initial efforts to make both the Labor Party and Parliamentary democracy more accountable. That is why they played up so much the view that Gilllard deserved to be punished for having replaced Rudd before the election. In fact, whatever considerable faults remain with Gillard, which the Greens and Independents need to address, her toppling of Kevin Rudd was a stunning blow for genuine democracy and accountability in this country and for that reason alone she deserved to defeat the Coalition of Tony Abbott. The best outcome would have been a hung parliament with Labor having the most seats. Now that the Coalition has just got more than Labor, it seems that the Greens and Independents will be put under immense pressure by the Murdoch Press and Australia's wealthy elite to make a deal with the Coalition, rather than Labor. If the Coalition were to become the Government, even in coalition with some independents, there is still a considerable risk that it will 'discover' finances worse than it claims to have realises so far and use this as an excuse to impose all sorts of harmful policies not discussed with electors in the election campaign. We must not forget how the Howard Government did this after the 1996 election. Gillard is unlikely to be able to get away so easily should she choose to govern in this fashion.

"humans are not beasts ... not bound by resource limits. " It is strange that there are quasi-religious- feel-good ideologies out there totally divorced from reality, totally based on misdirected "one-world" compassionate but mis-guided feelings towards the superiority of the human race! We are a race apart, not dependent on the laws of finite ecological systems, not bound by natural limitations, or natural laws that limit livelihoods and sustainability. We can simply keep expanding, without consequences, and the planet will keep expanding accordingly. Animals have natural laws that limit their expansion and success, but humans are unique, boundless, divine, sacred, and thus there can't be too many of us! There are even conservationist groups, climate change action groups, and humanitarian aid groups with similar illogical thinking. They blame everything else, the symptoms of growth, but not actually our overpopulation. Many people believe that there is no such thing as overpopulation, that either the earth will accommodate an unlimited human population because it always has or that God has decreed that we must "go forth and multiply" without limitation. Some even argue that the idea of only having a few children rather than having as many as possible represents a liberal agenda to kill off the white race. Others say that population growth is slowing. For more than three decades now, the average number of babies being born to women in most of the world has been in decline. Globally, women today have half as many babies as their mothers did, mostly out of choice. Half the world already has a fertility rate below the long-term replacement level. That includes all of Europe, much of the Caribbean and the far east from Japan to Vietnam and Thailand, Australia, Canada, Sri Lanka, Turkey, Algeria, Kazakhstan, and Tunisia. These fertility rates do not take into account total numbers, or growth from immigration. Most of the extra consumption has been in rich countries that have long since given up adding substantial numbers to their population, while most of the remaining population growth is in countries with a very small impact on the planet. This ignores the fact that people from developing nations are seeking to leave, due to famine or turmoil, not due to per capita consumption but due to total consumption and destruction as the result of total human numbers - and growth. Others way it's not a problem, but it's behavior thats the problem. we can live on the planet in a regenerative way instead of a degenerative way, it just takes education. So instead of limiting human growth, we all take a step downward in living standards and "share" our resources more evenly to embrace those in poorer communities. Overpopulation is an excuse dreamed up by people who want to shift focus away from the real issue, which is the overproduction and consumption of commodities. These are some of the denialist theories. The Citizens Electoral Lobby recuit them for their own politcal agendas.

Yet another example of a complete and utter incompetant government...In fact this Government in Australia is worse than incompetant, they are mind boggling useless on every angle...Anyone would think Australia was athird world country the way it is run..If it wasnt for all the money flowing in this country, I think it would be a third world country. Any country that doesnt respect its native wildlife, and does nothing to preserve them will eventually become a third world country..

Tuesday, 24/08/2010 The Department of Environment and Conservation in Western Australia has been accused of animal cruelty, following a parliamentary inquiry into its management of former pastoral leases. The inquiry's report found the DEC had neglected its landholder responsibilities, allowed hundreds of animals to die, allowed feral animals and weeds to flourish and had not fully complied with the principles of the 'Good Neighbour Policy'. Colleen Barker, a former employee of a tourism venture which operated on one of the DEC stations, says she saw hundreds of kangaroos die of dehydration after the department closed down a number of the station's watering points. She believes the State Government should be held accountable.
"I do believe that in regards to the inhumane death of many animals; if a pastoralist or a farmer was to do the same thing that the DEC has done, they would be clearly prosecuted," she says. "The evidence has clearly shown that the DEC has failed and there has been inhumane deaths of animals... I believe they (DEC) should be prosecuted."
Ms Barker says during her time at Cobra Station, it was clear to her that the DEC had no management plan for the pastoral lease.
"I think the DEC has their hands full, and if they aren't able to put more manpower and resources towards the management of these stations, then I think they actually shouldn't own them."
To read the parliamentary inquiry yourself, go to: http://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/web/newwebparl.nsf/iframewebpages/Committees+-+Inquiries http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/201008/s2991822.htm To unsubscribe from these announcements, login to the forum and uncheck "Receive forum announcements and important notifications by email." in your profile. You can view the full announcement by following this link: http://www.liveexportshame.com/news2/index.php?topic=6361.0

I received the following through the candobetter contact facility on 27 August.

I was unemployed for more than 5 months. living in Brisbane, got post-graduate degrees, and other qualifications and more than 14 (months(?) - editor) experience in administration. struggling to find out a single job. Applied for more than 1400
jobs , Everywhere getting discriminated against because I am an Asian. But a permenant resident. Loss of job means loss of dignity. I think I reached at the end of my tunnel. What shall I do other than suicide? Please help me .

Some corrections made in transcribing the above. - Editor

My reply of 28 August


I sympathise with your desperate plight. The only practical advice I am able to offer at this time is that you contact LifeLine (www.lifeline.org.au ph 131114).

Many foreign-born and Australian-born members of the Australian workforce have suffered similar difficulties and hardships. Practically every adult needs a constant and substantial stream of income in order to maintain a decent standard of living free of undue stress and hardship. Yet this is denied to the majority of members of this society and most other societies. This is particularly denied to people who have been unable to obtain the necessary skilled training. As your case shows, even those who have obtained training and good qualifications can miss out because of discrimination.

No society should entice foreign-born workers to undergo training as it has in your case unless it is able to guarantee a secure job to all of its native-born workers as well as its imported workers. You are a victim of an unfair situation brought about by the wealthy elites in control of this society and which has not been sought by the majority of this society.

I hadn't heard of this CEC before - but going to their website, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. "Human beings are not animals! We're not beasts! Human beings are created with reason, in God's image, and are not bound by any sort of resource limitation!" etc. And I'm sure they believe Australia can support a perpetually growing population despite the mathematical absurdity of it. Humans are animal. We are very smart in some ways, but in other ways (planning for the long term in particular) we're as dumb as any other type of animal.

If human numbers are allowed to greatly exceed this planet's carrying capacity, then the humanitarian disasters of the 20th century, in which genocide was committed against many millions of human beings, will seem small in comparison to the humanitarian disasters that will be made inevitable by the collapse of the planetary life support system which sustains human life. Those, who accuse population stability advocates of being morally no better than Nazi genocidalists, as for example the Citizens Electoral Council are, are themselves, making far more likely far greater human catastrophes than were ever caused by Hitler, Stalin or Pol Pot. An example of CEC pro-population growth propaganda is their denunciation of Australian population stability advocate Dick Smith.

Pundits of every possible political stripe plead for continued population growth, and accuse those of wanting to halt population growth of being in the opposite camp. Capitalists accuse those opposing population growth as being naive Marxist socialists. Marxists accuse those of opposing population growth as being evil capitalists who want to cull the poor. Feminists accuse those of opposing population growth as traditionalists wanting to control and restrict a woman's right to have children. etc. etc. Actually they all seem to be obeying some kind of powerful genetic impulse to reproduce and multiply with no thought for the long term consequences. In nature this invariably ends up with that species crashing catastrophically.

Pakistan and India are one, pre British tyranny. This is a subcontinent human catastrophe. India's neglect of Pakistan deserves condemnation & boycott. I note the above commenters seek callous mass human misery from the Pakistan floods, which I despise. But I place the immediate responsibility for relief on India, Pakistan's soul mate pre-Britain. India should be condemned for neglecting Pakistan at its time of crisis. Pakistan is a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations. Surely this abject neglect of one of its member nations by the Commonwealth will seal a deserved death of this 19th Century imperial and exploitist 'commonwealth' dynasty? Neighbouring China and Russia being long-standing strategic beneficiaries of Pakistan are similarly complicit by neglecting the Pakistan flood calamity. The West is no more obligated to support Pakistan than wealthy India, China and Russia. On this basis does the West justify a message to Pakistan that aid will not coming? Is this the West's population control strategy?

Ed. This letter to the editor was cc'd to me by the author, Judy Bamberger, today. I am publishing it because it contains useful and original observations on the 2010 election.

Fielding's Failure

Family First Fielding's failure to be re-elected has invigorated him to derail Australia's future and throw us into another election.

Proclaiming that the voters gave Labor "a huge slap across the face," Victorian Fielding ignores Victoria's Senate results: Labor swing of -2.98%; Liberals/Nationals larger swing of -5.22%. Victorians voted NEARLY TWICE the amount of dissatisfaction with Liberal/National Senate candidates than Labor!

It's nonsensical that Fielding whinges about automatically voting against Labor-introduced bills, with the Liberals/Nationals copping a far more substantial beating!

The voters gave Fielding "a huge slap across the face" by defeating him soundly. The Australian Sex Party received nearly as many votes as did Family First!

The only one "not worthy of a second term" is Fielding himself and his petulant, vindictive attitude.

(Signed Judy Bamberger)

Copyright notice: Reproduction of this material is encouraged as long as the source is acknowledged.

The CASSE position sets the record straight on the conflict between economic growth and environmental protection. Climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution are just three powerful examples. And how will the next generation find jobs when the planet can’t support our overgrown economy? The CASSE position calls for a desirable solution – a steady state economy with stabilized population and consumption – beginning in the wealthiest nations and not with extremist tactics. Join the likes of E. O. Wilson, Jane Goodall, and David Suzuki; fill in the information below to sign the position and support a healthy, sustainable economy. http://steadystate.org/act/sign-the-position/

This is an article from todays Busselton Dunsborough Times and shows how much the totally useless Busselton Shire Council cares about local native fauna, regardless whether they are originally from WA or the East Coast.. Its no wonder Australia has the highest rate of animal extinctions in the world..Australians environmentaly friendly what a joke..This wouldnt happen in most other countries.. The trial culling of Little and eastern long billed Corellas in the shire has been approved by the USELESS elected members. Without debate on Wednesday the group agreed to allow a volunteer shooter to start the cull for 12 months with a shoot plan to be drawn up with the USELESS council staff. In a staff report the Corellas seen in Busselton townsite are "believed" to be native to SE Australia and have previously been held in captivity or escaped and bred in the wild.. They pose an environmental threat.. to other native birds and animals of the local area by out competing them for nesting hollows and interbreeding with other WA sub species of Corella . Other issues associated with the birds have included damage to public amenity-, negative impact on vegetation, noise pollution and public health concern..All utter bullshit.. They are treating these Corellas the same as they treat the national symbol the kangaroo in this country if they get in the almighty two legged devils way shoot them... The human races time will come in the not too distant future, Im sure of it..

Even as Pakistani and international relief officials scrambled to save people and property, they despaired that the nation’s worst natural calamity had ruined just about every physical strand that knit this country together — roads, bridges, schools, health clinics, electricity and communications. The destruction could set Pakistan back many years, if not decades, further weaken its feeble civilian administration and add to the burdens on its military. It is in this northern section where most of the ancient tribes still live and where many ancient tribal cultures and customs still exist. Each individual state within the country has a governor, and each city has its own mayor. Additionally, most tribal groups have a head chief. Each tribal group also has certain ceremonies that are an important part of the marriages within that group. In 1950, Pakistan had a population of 37 million people and was the world’s 13th largest country as measured by population. By 2007, Pakistan was the sixth largest country with 164 million people. Pakistan is projected by the United Nations to move to fifth place in 2050 with 292 million people, after India, Although the modern nation of Pakistan was but fifty-three years old in 2000, it has territorial areas and tribal populations whose histories date back many centuries; thus Pakistan has both an ancient and a relatively new identity. Tribal culture means that people marry, often at a young age. They do it often because it's in their tradition to get married- whather they can afford to support one another or not- and have a large number of children, again whether they can afford to support a large amount of children or not. It's usually the families who pressure their sons and daughters to marry. And if they don't marry, they face pressure not just from families, but their societies as well for it's awkward not to marry after entering adulthood in most rural areas of Pakistan and is often frowned upon. The solution is to somehow break this tribalist culture of chasing unnecessary marriage and pressure from the families and the mentality which dominates all of Pakistan's classes except for the elite class who no longer follow the customs of their previous generations and do not live under the power of their families. Enpowering women with education and choices would help them balance population growth with natural resources, but their fundamentalist religion sees women as lesser beings, or too fragile, to allow such choices. Few are likely to be aware of the stagnation of Pakistan’s family planning program, which provides key services to Pakistani families and affects the country’s larger demographic trajectory. The provision of comprehensive, voluntary family planning and reproductive health services is a fundamental human right, and yet today these services still remain out of reach for millions of Pakistanis.

Back in the 1960s, college kids gave up a Sunday meal to send food to Bangladesh. Result: they grew from 80 million to a whopping 157 million people. So what’s the problem? Bangladeshis live in a flood plain the size of Wisconsin. Human overpopulation dictates millions of miserable, hopeless and terrible lives. Living conditions: beyond sickening! Today, nearby Pakistan suffers an enormous population As a world traveler, I find it almost comical if not outright astonishing that Marlowe defiantly rejects any talk of overpopulation. With Pakistan’s 180 million population on its way to 335 million by mid century—when does Marlowe or the leaders of Pakistan ‘think’ it might be advantageous to distribute birth control rather than food? Why does culture and religion trump reason, logic and rational action? Why would the leaders of a country proceed toward even greater human tragedy? Why scoff at the realities they face today that will grow 100 fold within 40 years? How can one country and all its people be that stupid? You can count on one thing to solve all their problems: Mother Nature! Her methods grow more ominous as Pakistan’s population grows more unsustainable. Frosty Wooldridge www.BeforeItsNews.com

It's ridiculous how these big telecommunications companies won't go into more rural areas because it's not "lucrative" enough for them. America's brand of capitalism is too out of control - I live in Evergreen, CO, and the "high speed internet providers in my area" (look at the webpage and you'll see what I mean) is like the pirates of the carribean ride at disneyland. You wait for forever and then once you're finally on you get kicked off after about 5 minutes.

Goldfields mine rescue worker has told how he has been threatened and labelled "Satan" for shooting a wild horse with a high-powered hunting bow and filming its death. Jeremy Webb, who lives in Norseman with his wife and a two-year-old child, was acquitted of animal cruelty last month but could soon be back in court. The State Solicitor's Office has appealed against the magistrate's acquittal, which came after prosecution evidence was ruled inadmissible. "You do one thing that people don't know the facts about and you're some kind of Satan," Mr Webb said. "I'm a good person and I have looked after a lot of people in this town." Mr Webb, 31, said he was hunting last August with a compound bow when he was confronted by the brumby about 15km from Norseman. "I was nervous," he said. "I was over a kilometre away from my car and this horse had a go and I didn't want to end up injured out there. It was a wild stallion." He said he shot the horse when it came within 4m of him. "If it's going to have a go at you, you're entitled to have a go back," he said. But Mr Webb's decision to video the dying horse with his mobile phone camera resulted in the RSPCA and police investigating the case. He has since had threatening phone calls. "I showed it to some mates at work and someone dobbed me in," Mr Webb said. A keen hunter and archer, he saw no harm in having a record of the kill. "The horse just stood there after being shot and I didn't want that so I kicked it over," he said. He then butchered the horse, took the meat home and fed it to his dogs. "I wasn't going to drop something like that and let it go to waste," he said. When Magistrate Felicity Zempilas ruled the warrant used by police to seize the video was obtained illegally, the prosecution case collapsed. Mr Webb entered and left court last month wearing a full-face motorcycle helmet. He has since joked that he was impersonating "The Stig" from television program Top Gear.

Western Australia continues to record more cases of extreme kangaroo cruelty. This time a female kangaroo was left for dead near Kirup after her legs were shot off by a party of 3 men whom police have identified. The kangaroo and her joey were put down

From what I read and hear about the current Pakistan floods, it is a massive and urgent humanitarian crisis devastating over 20 million people (equivalent to the population of Australia).

Pakistan is an urgent drop everything global priority!

Urgent humanitarian relief comes before government-discretionary wars, politics and the financial crises of rich nations self-inflicted by greed and slack banking governance anyway. The GFC saw trillions materialise in weeks by wealthy nations to address was an 'economic' crisis. Pakistan right now has an humanitarian crisis. G20 priorities suck! Thousands of people are about to die in weeks if the substandard humanitarian relief continues the way it is!

The humanitarian response is a joint obligation by nations to be best directed by Pakistan with partnership support co-ordinated by the United Nations (UN) and funded by Pakistan and its immediate and regional wealthy neighbours - India, Russia, China. Every region gets its regrettable turn at widespread disaster and now is Central Asia's.

Problem is that the UN is owed millions promised by rich nations and both Pakistan and the UN are ill-prepared. The UN is forever ill-prepared.

Humanitarian relief to saves lives and avert mass trauma, disease and starvation is a completely separate issue to addressing overpopulation.

The Pakistan humanitarian crisis a natural disaster and not related to cultural choice to breed excessively.

The cause should also be a global focus - the stationary monsoon associated with the record high temperatures across Russia which contributed to the unprecedented bushfire disaster have been linked to climate change. This suggests such calamities are likely set to become more frequent globally and the world's countries needs to start serious contingency planning and investment.

But one must morally object to linking measures for addressing overpopulation to humanitarian crises. Now is not the time in Pakistan to squabble. It is immoral to address overpopulation with humanitarian neglect, mass starvation and death from consequential disease.

Australia’s shortage of available homes will more than quadruple to almost half a million by 2020 if the nation doesn’t increase the pace of construction, a new report claims. HIA, which represents the building industry, sees a need for 466,000 new homes to be built by 2020. The gap currently stands at 109,000 homes, the group said. The strong economy has helped drive up house prices, with the increases exacerbated by lags in housing construction. There is a building boom in Melbourne's apartment market and it is being driven by changing lifestyles, housing shortages and overseas investors, experts say. (The Age, 26 August- Housing shortage fuels apartment boom). The frenzy is being echoed in the inner suburbs, where 32 of 94 large residential projects planned for the CBD and inner city moved to the construction phase in the past 18 months. When population growth is involved we face this paradox. You can't cure a "shortage" by increasing the supply. Given the exponential nature of population growth, once the repressive effect of a "shortage" is removed, the multiplication of demanders soon nullifies any increase in supply. The same can also be said of any effort to increase our percentage of renewable energy. Population growth means that the percentage of renewable must keep outstripping the rate of population growth. The increased supply is simply converted into a larger population. At that point the uncomfortable situation of a shortage is reestablished, but this time at a higher level of population. So we have a "housing boom" competing with population growth. The word "longage" is not in any dictionary. On the other hand, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, "shortage" has been in use since 1868. One can perhaps get a clearer understanding of the carrying capacity problem by seeing it essentially as caused by a population "longage" rather than any "shortages". The result (of that "longage" of people or "shortage" of food) depending on how one looks at it. Our longage of people in Australia, all demanding housing - a basic right - is one that is not due to large families - but a political decision of our political leaders in consultation with business groups, not the people of Australia. Australia is not over-populated yet, but when do we apply the brakes to the driver of our boosted growth rate? In one generation, two generations down the track? Dick Smith points out the fact that he grew up "free range", in a house that would be quite out of range of most pockets, but he had fences and trees to climb, and plenty of space. We are, due to political decisions to favour the housing industry, are being forced into apartments where children will be denied the lifestyles of their forebearers. - all due to the greed of today's decision-makers.

The Pakistani Taliban are planning to attack foreigners helping with flood relief efforts in the country, a senior US official has warned. The Taliban plan "to conduct attacks against foreigners participating in the ongoing flood relief operations in Pakistan", the official told the BBC. The official also said "provincial ministers in Islamabad" may be at risk. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11092868 The Taliban do not want the Westerners to be seen in a "good" and charitable light, but as the enemy. Some five million Pakistanis have no shelter, and urgently need tents or plastic sheeting to protect them from the sun. Already termed the worst flooding to hit Pakistan for 80 years, this deluge has affected millions of people, and so far over 1,600 have died. The high population growth rate in Pakistan has contributed to a rapid deterioration of the country's natural environment. This includes extensive deforestation and the building of dams for irrigation and power generation across tributaries of the Indus river. What sets this year apart from others is the intensity and localisation of the rainfall. "There is currently no effective water management strategy to speak of in Pakistan," says Shah Murad Aliani, country representative for the International Union for Conservation of Nature in Pakistan. During a warm period 6,000 years ago, the Indus was a monster river, more powerful and more prone to flooding than today. Then, 4,000 years ago, as the climate cooled, a large part of it simply dried up. So, will global warming have the reverse effect, returning the Indus to the monster river of 6,000 years ago? "That is the million-dollar question", said Professor John Clague, from Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, Canada, an expert on the Asian monsoon. "There is huge uncertainty… and this is a matter of heated debate amongst scientists at present." The current floods could also be blamed to some degree on deforestation and more people living in flood-prone areas as the population keeps growing. Pakistan has lost vast areas of forest over the past few decades, while overgrazing often strips degraded land of whatever plant cover is left. The government has set a target to boost forest cover from 5.2 percent to 6 percent by 2014. The Taliban don't want Foreigners helping, and they should not get our donations either! It may seem cruel, but help and charity starts at home. If we don't manage our own numbers, then Nature will do it for us. Humans are incapable of managing the balance between Nature and their own population impacts. Globalisation has blurred the borders between international and national responsibilities. The ball is in their court, and a valuable lesson must be learnt about restoring forests and vegetation, and that family planning is not misanthropic, but in their own long-term nterests.

Thousands of Australian marriages may be invalid because celebrants have not used exact wording required by law. According to the federal Attorney-General's department, almost 80 per cent of the ceremonies reviewed last year did not comply with the requirement for celebrants to recite precise words from the Marriage Act. A spokesman for the department said 261 of the 336 sample ceremonies submitted by celebrants as part of their five-yearly review did not comply with the legal requirements. As a result of the performance review, 1339 celebrants were de-registered or had decided to resign since September 2003. Celebrants said part of the problem was "cowboy" trainers who had entered the field since deregulation in 2003, while others blamed an overly legalistic approach. Since 2006-07, the department has imposed a narrow legal interpretation on what wording can be used in the vow. The problem has the potential to impact on wills, residence visas and bank loans. However, it would be up to the Family Court to declare a marriage invalid, and according to Tony Gelme, the president of the Coalition of Celebrant Associations, an incorrectly worded wedding vow was unlikely to be sufficient grounds to nullify a marriage. Source: Compiled by APN from media reports

Forcing people to tolerant to the point of wiping their noses into their still relatively fresh pain from loss of lives from 9/11 is pushing the politically-correct agenda to extremes. Most of Saudi Arabia's Christians are foreign workers. No churches are allowed to be built there. No mosques can be built in the Vatican either. However, the USA has an open policy of freedoms enshrined in their constitution, but there is no recipricol agreement in the Middle East. Is this an indication that there is some recognition that the 9/11 tragedy was actually not caused by Islamic terrorists but by the CIA? Is it a cover-up, a way of making amends? A smokescreen? A diversion?

The White House says President Obama will have no further comment on the mosque near Ground Zero in New York and the administration will not get involved in talks about relocating the controversial facility. One thing is freedom of religion, another thing is to fly into the face of the sensitivities of people who suffered the loss of loved ones in 9/11! Mr. Obama has said that he supports the right of Muslims to build the community center and mosque two blocks from Ground Zero! Some have likened this to building a memorial to Hitler near Auschwitz! Freedom of religious worship is enshrined in America's constitution, but many believe such an overt expression of Islam is unacceptable so close to Ground Zero. Supporters say the centre will help build bridges between Muslims and other Americans. However, it could also enflame resentments, hostility and widen the gulf between those loyal to mainstream American culture and to those more recently arriving there - creating the diversity of ethnic origin and religions. Nine years on, the emotional and physical scars of the 9/11 attacks are still raw. Why rub people's noses in the tragedy? This issue has now reached the point where to build this mosque could, regardless of the political and religious arguments, become a focus of hate and vitriol for many years to come. The US government cannot establish any religion as the state religion or prevent anyone from practicing any religion. However, it doesn't say that the government cannot control where you build a church or mosque though.

The Brushtail Possum will be another Australian species to become extinct in the near future...Peter Garrett is a complete and utter waste of space, a powerless puppet..He will do nothing to stop this barbarity to these possums as there is money involved..Unfortunately thats all this Government cares about is money and the environment and beautiful Australian Fauna will be wiped out in the future...The only Aussie Battlers in this country is the native Australian animal population that goes through hell just to survive..Shame on Aussies for their disrespect to these animals...As they say what goes around comes around..

http://www.wlpa.org/exploited_wildlife.htm The Tasmanian Government is about to authorise the commercial killing yet again of Brushtail Possums for export to Asian markets. Tell our government authorities that there is NO excuse for this brutal and unsustainable trade, and that our fauna is more valuable than a mere commodity to be traded. Insist that the export of our magnificent Brushtail Possums be immediately stopped for these reasons: The Dept of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment Tasmania has placed the interests of big business above the welfare and conservation of native fauna. Possum populations cannot be sustained at the high level of commercial and non commercial killing (100,000 - 300,000 Brushtail Possums annually). The claims of crop damage caused by Brushtail Possums must be addressed by reviewing land management practices and implementing humane alternatives to trapping/shooting and 1080 poisoning. The Dept of Primary Industry, Parks, Water & Environment plans to promote and expand the trade. See website: www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/trade-use/invitecomment/brushtail-po... The abattoir where possums are killed (Lenah Game Meats) was secretly filmed in 1999 and revealed immense cruelty, pain & suffering. You can watch this on YouTube at: http://www.youtube.comwatch?v=VnGMN1sOtK0 Tell the Federal Government that you want it to listen to YOU and NOT vested commercial interests. Tell our politicians that you plan to boycott all Tasmanian products until this carnage stops. Our wildlife is priceless. The animals don’t have a voice but you do. Please act now! The Hon. Peter Garrett Min for Environment PO Box 6022 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 7640 Fax: 02 6273 6101 [email protected] The Hon. David Bartlett Premier GPO 123 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Tel: 03 6233 8807 Fax: 03 6233 8013 [email protected] Tourism Tasmania GPO 399 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Tel: 03 6230 8235 Fax: 03 6230 8353 [email protected]

Despite living in a well established democracy, and that about 80% of the people of Australia do not want more population we are not allowed to vote on this and other vital, impacting, issues. The Federal government consults business experts for the numbers they want, not the voters, the people of Australia. There is a lot of hype about a handful of asylum seekers coming to Australia's shores each year, but there is little threat from them. They are being used as a smoke-screen for the hundreds of thousands new "skilled" immigrants coming to settle here each year. This is not a racism issue, but one that impacts on so many dimensions of our lives. Our local councils and State governments are forced to "manage" the population growth, whether we want it or not! We are forced to pay for infrastructure, and ensure the water supplies, power, roads, hospitals, public transport, food security etc, and at the same time become more "sustainable"! The "shortages" in housing is about too many people! We need to pressure Canberra, with the influence of Independents, to stabilise our numbers and get these decisions, on immigration, out of the hands of those who are benefiting!

"Our immigration program provides a boost to our productivity and our workforce participation rate - two vital components, along with population growth, of the efforts to meet the cost of population ageing". Australia's real challenge is population ageing; Sydney Morning Herald According to this article, "Birth rates have dropped dramatically over the past half-century"? Surely, it means that people are having smaller families, due to contraception, working women, and a choice! However, this distorted statement appears that we are actually dropping in the number of overall births! The Intergeneration report predicts that the proportion of Australians over 65 will grow to more than 20 per cent of the population by 2050. Surely a longer life and more aging people is sign of prosperity? Older people bring wisdom, support and balance to our society, along with a human resource for child caring and volunteer work. However, "balancing" the democratic increase in older people by importing more young people, immigrants, would simply be foolish and short-sighted. Every older person was once young, and every young person, barring an early death, will grow old. Increasing the numbers of young people will simply create a further disproportion of older people further down the track, and the problem will escalate. Surveys and economic theories are simple, and based in infinite numbers and distinct from the real, finite, world. People's need and desires are complex, and societies are multi-dimensional. What seems logical on paper, add more people for more workers and to fix the age disproportions, ignores the reality that our planet, our nation, our natural resources are finite and that population growth impacts negatively on quality of life, and means more environmental depletion. We should not be forcing the next generations to inherit, and be disadvantaged by, reckless decisions made by our leaders today. We should not be ignoring peak oil, peak water, peak soil, climate change, and just assume that "technology" will come up with so many solutions in such a short time frame, and ignore our finite planet.

The story of josie has quite touched me and very reflective of my own experience with Brushtail Possums. I am in the area which was nearly totally destroyed by the black saturday bushfires where many native animals were killed, displaced which has led to their death or suffered very severe and painful injuries from burns, eg "Sam" the koala. Many of the native animal carers in this area also had their properties destroyed and in some cases lost many animals let alone being in a position to be able to accept more. I took on the care of some brushtail possums, and have found that it has been one of the most rewarding thing I have ever done. Brushtail possums can and will bond with humans by their own choice and will form very close relationships with you. I saved 7 animals that were victims of these fires, five of which rehabilitated into the wild but two of the possums stayed with me did so by"THEIR" choice, they were quite free to return to the wild if they wished to do so. The stupid comments made by you Dave shows you are the one that has the problem because the only freak animal here is you, stick to hugging trees Dave, you know more about doing that than you do about possums. Because of my efforts seven animals are now alive that would not be and in all probability they would have suffered slow horrible deaths, What a horrible person I must be to stop this from happening!!!. What is the difference between a dog or a cat loving its owner or a possum loving its owner. Possums have very individual personalities and like a dog or a cat they respond to affection, they fret when your not there and they will stress severely if you try to separate them from their owner. Here in Victoria the same bone headed mentality exists where the belief of the so called experts is that the possum is better off being put down rather than live with a human owner but as least here in Victoria unlike Queensland, some latitude is allowed for licences to be issued possess these delightful animals under some tight regulations. The look on the face of children to able see a possum close-up and to be able to give her some food or a little pat on the head (which my possums love by the way) and have them responds by giving child a little lick or a snuggle with their little pink noses. Yes Dave, This is so harmful and a real exploitation of a native animal and real danger of teaching children appreciation these animals. In conclusion I am not advocating that anybody goes out and catch a possum with the aim as having it as a pet, If you want a pet get a cat or dog, in all likelyhood if you were to pick up a wild brushtail possum it would tear you to pieces, Possums are very intelligent animals that learn very quickly and on warm summer nights certainly entertain with there antics, there is no rule that fits all but please let some common sense prevail. Enjoy these wonderful and unique animals.

Letter was CC'd to me this morning. - JS PM-wannabe Abbott is so eager to move into The Lodge that he misrepresents Saturday's election results. Yes; Labor had a "savage swing" against it. If merely 2% is "savage" (two-party preferred). Two-party preferred still shows Labor with a majority of 50.7% to Liberals mere 49.3%. While it may be that "the public expect a change of government as a result of yesterday's result," the results show Australians do *NOT* want Liberals to form government. First preferences indicate emphatically the public want a Green-er government, with Labor's loss of 4.9% going significantly - 3.6% - to the Greens, and a fractional-percent, 0.6%, to Liberals. Australians elected a Green Senator from virtually every state and territory. In Victoria, the swing to the Greens was stunning: the Greens gained 4% and, historically, a seat in the House; Liberals lost 2%, almost double Labor's loss. In Queensland, the swing to the Greens was nearly twice the Liberals'. In Tasmania, the Greens collected the Liberals 5% loss; even Labor swung positive. In ACT, Liberal Senator Humphries didn't obtain a full quota on first preferences; a significant swing from Liberals, he'll need preferences before claiming his Senate seat. Abbott's self-serving proclamation indicates that he doesn't have a clue that he and the Coalition "lost [their] legitimacy" to govern along with Labor. Australians didn't vote "stable, predictable"; Australians voted Green-er. Get your facts straight, Tony! Judy Bamberger, O'Connor ACT (not a member of the Greens; just someone who knows how to read and interpret statistics)

Family First recognises that Australia, in company with the developed world, faces a serious demographic imbalance and that decisive action is needed to reverse the declining trends in the birth rate if our economic prosperity is to be preserved. I wonder how they explain this sentence? What is the "serious demographic imbalance"? Do they mean not enough first world nations, not enough "white" people? Too many under-developed nations, so the "developed world" needs to have population growth? They are blatantly ignoring climate change and the finite nature of our planet. Surely, for a Christian-based party, this is simply greed, by taking limited resources, encouraging higher consumption and greater impacts on our planet, with diminishing capacity to contain the people we have? Preserving "economic prosperity" through population growth? Surely they have fallen for the population myth, that more people means prosperity, when the contrary is true. Supporting population growth to gain prosperity is surely based on capitalistic greed also. These groups cannot claim to represent the Christian vote entirely, although they do have some merits. However, I believe the traditional family must be endorsed and protected but population growth, and excess diversity, are contrary to good family and community values. How to they explain homelessness and the housing crisis? They are ignoring the intrinsic value of the environment and wildlife, and the destruction inherently required for further population growth in their race for dominance through greater numbers. They will never be a holistic or altruistic political force, or represent mainstream concerns, with such gaping inconsistencies in their policies.

I believe that solar panels are an excellent way to provide clean, green and renewable energy to power a wide variety of devices. The power from solar panels is strong, reliable and easy to maintain. And on top of that it is also good for our environment. So it is awesome to see that Toyota is taking this initiative. Editorial comment: This comes very close to being an advertisement.

Re: Milly's comment above 'Family First and population growth' 22nd August 2010:

"Family First will promote policies that address declining population
growth through broader policies to promote family formation, stability and
sustainability."

This statement is ignorant of the global human population explosion. Human population is not declining. If it kept pace with declining Koala populations there would be cause to celebrate the human population trend.

Having said that, I support political parties that are alternative to LibLab.
This is fundamentally because they offer alternative policies to LibLab self-centred conservativism and question the LibLab presumption of self-righteousness to Australian public representation and government.

Many Family First Party policies have merit like 'supporting families in their aspirations to have children and bring them up within a family environment that reflects an appropriate balance between work and family', etc.

Yes, 'our rate of migration actually inhibits our ability to take on refugees' - since non-refugee migrants (economic migrants) impose higher consumption and public resource demands upon Australian taxpayer funds.

But Family First is morally backward by its explicit denial of women to the right to abortion - 'Family First is opposed to the medical procedure of abortion.'

Such is a backward characteristically catholic male perspective on women's 'place' in society. Yet inconsistently such catholic male dogma will not condemn a male for getting a woman pregnant, who fails to honour his moral obligation to that woman and to father the child and become a good husband and father for life, or to recognise that unintended pregnancies can cause more harm than good, or to simply accept the natural right of a woman to choose what happens to her body. It is backward and sexist to cast blame on one side of a sexual relationship.

It is backward and sexist to hold the woman responsible and apply a single idealistic rule to all women, irrespective of the circumstances of pregnancy -including rape. Family First's mandatory anti-abortion impost on women is comparable to the fundamentalist Islamic mandatory impost on women to wear the Burkah or Nijab. It is backward to discriminate against women's rights. The immorality of imposing birth on an unwanted pregnancy is comparable to imposing castration on the man who caused the pregnancy. I support neither.

If parents learn that a foetus is down-syndromed, they have the right to terminate. The mother as absolute right since it is her body and life.

Family First, while holding on to such a backward culture, does have a few morally valid policies even though many read as a tad motherhood:

* Better Accountability of Our Politicians
* Better Workplace Conditions And Job Security
* Small Business - The True Heroes Of The Economy
* Binge Drinking Destroys Families
* Affordable Housing For First Homebuyers
[I disagree with 'Cutting Petrol Tax' because it perpetuates a petroleum-dependent culture]
* Protecting Our Environment
* Managing Our Most Precious Resource – Water
* A Fairer And More Compassionate Tax System
* Making Bank Fees Fair
* Ensuring Decent Standards On Television
* Protecting Children From Pornography
* Shared Parenting Is Best For Children
* Family Friendly Child Care
* Caring For Carers
* Valuing Stay-At-Home Parents
* On Human Life – Euthanasia And Human Cloning
* Minimising The Impact Of Illegal Drugs
* Caring For The Less Fortunate – Poverty And Human Rights
* Respecting And Helping Older Australians
* Honouring Veterans
* Helping Indigenous Australians
* Giving Our Children The Best Start In Life
* Healthy Opportunities For All Australians
* Strengthening Regional Communities
* Stronger Relationships Mean Better Societies
* Supporting People With A Disability
* Standing Up For Our Agricultural Sector
* Supporting Parents With Paid Maternity Leave
* Fair, Fast And Modern Communications

So with all these otherwise 21st Century ideals, alternative political parties to LibLab are to be encouraged.

POPULATION Family First recognises that Australia, in company with the developed world, faces a serious demographic imbalance and that decisive action is needed to reverse the declining trends in the birth rate if our economic prosperity is to be preserved. Family First will promote policies that address declining population growth through broader policies to promote family formation, stability and sustainability. In particular Family First will promote policies that actively support families in their aspirations to have children and bring them up within a family environment that reflects an appropriate balance between work and family. Family First will also seek to support a carefully managed and compassionate response to applications of refugees and migrants. Family First acknowledges the immensely positive and enriching contributions migrants have made to the development of our nation. Family First recognises that well managed and compassionate intakes of new migrants and refugees who demonstrate a commitment to our nation and constitution will continue to have a positive impact on our society’s growth and prosperity. NB:No mention of our finite natural resources, caring for God's Creation, stopping Australia's extinction rate, the costs of housing and the basics of living that actually are contrary to family life. Our rate of migration actually inhibits our ability to take on refugees. Nothing about environmental destruction, and the depletion of natural resources such as forests, oil, fish stocks, or the impacts of climate change that will bring misery, despair and world famine due to lack of arable land and water. How can we take any of their issues seriously if they are in denial? Where is the evidence of enlightenment, or recognition that our planet is finite? They condemn the Greens for immorality, akin to Sodom and Gomorrah, but the sins of omission may be even worse and more dire!

If any animals are endangered, they should be protected. Does it matter whether the last dugong or sea turtle was killed by an indigenous person or not? These Native Title exceptions are more about anthropocentric and narcissist "human rights" or traditions than about protecting animals from atrocities, or extinction. Extinction is forever, no matter who ultimately causes it. The laws protecting wildlife should be consistent, whether the killers of protected whales are Japanese or indigenous Australians. We are fine tuning any concepts of "racism" to make a "one world", dissolving national borders and sovereign responsibilities, but the costs on non-human species means that without national borders, their protection can be abandoned. Nature does not belong to humans, but has intrinsic value and a right to exist for the benefit of the planet as a whole. Animal and plant species are not optional extras on Earth, interesting bonuses, or resources simply to support human food chains or as economic resources. If the last tree falls in a precious rainforest, if the last Orangutan dies, if a frog species disappears, if the last dugong becomes extinct, it is the loss for the planet. The ethnic origins or the human "rights" of the person using the axe, the chainsaw, the shovel, the spear or the firearm, is irrelevant.

TRUTH In Ancient Greek - By Gabriel Chiron Alitheia in Ancient Greek means not merely “Truth” as we think of it in English. It means literally, un-covered, dis-covered, discovery, unveiled. Martin Heidegger saw the significance of this and went into it at length in his book, Parmenides. I want to go into it even more deeply. In a time like the present where propaganda, disinformation and psy-ops are being constantly and heavily utilized to dupe the masses in America, Britain and Europe (throughout the entire English-speaking world), truth of government wrong-doing, abuse-of-power and do-it-yourself-false-flag-terrorism, is constantly covered-up and needs uncovered, alitheia. The English word, Truth, etymologically connects to the same root as trust, which implies hypnotic states, conditioning and belief. In English, truth is merely what people firmly believe, have faith in. In the English-speaking world, whatever people believe without question, without inquiry and investigation, is supposed to be “Truth”. This is the underlying sociolinguistic tendency. The very meaning of “Truth” in English is whatever the stupid masses are manipulated to believe by their government so their government can successfully cover-up, litheia, with lies. In Ancient Greece, the Truth, Alitheia, is the Truth-That-Comes-Out, the Uncovered Truth, as a result of successful investigation of the cover-up, the lies and illusions of the time. Truth, Alitheia, is finding out what is really going on, what has really happened. Truth, Alitheia, in Ancient Greece, is a disillusionment, an awakening from common mass belief. But in the modern world of government cover-up, Truth-That-Uncovers-The-Facts is always called a “Conspiracy Theory” in the sense of a “crank belief of people who want to disrupt society”. This is the tendency in Ancient Greece which itself culminated in the martyrdom of Socrates. Socrates, like Parmenides, was a devotee of Alitheia, the Goddess of Truth, the Goddess of Uncovering Real Truth. It was not merely Socrates who was martyred in Athens, but Alitheia, the Goddess of Uncovering, of Discovery. The present governments of America and Britain are working very hard to kill Alitheia, Uncovered Truth, yet again and again. When a pattern of belief, a worldview or paradigm, is socially constructed as a “reality” in the human brain, it will reject unpleasant facts that do not fit the constructed pseudo-reality. Learning happens when through investigation the constructed pseudo-reality pattern in the cognitive system is broken down into its elements, which can then be reconfigured to include previously rejected unpleasant facts, which leads to a new paradigm. Periodic paradigm-shifting from time to time, even from the new paradigm to the new new paradigm, is the learning process as opposed to the mere cumulative effort of only building up the present paradigm with reinforcing facts that seem to fit the current belief. Philosophical expressions that do not entail paradigm-shifting through extensive and profound inquiry and investigation, which is a manifested learning process, are false philosophy. Any rigid belief or disbelief in the name of “philosophy” is a farce, an actual failure to philosophize. Real questioning of a belief or disbelief is the resurrection of Alitheia, the Ancient-Greek-Goddess-of-Dynamic-Truth-as- Discovery-and-Real-Learning. Real philosophy is a very rare thing on the Earth at this time because it has become equated with cynical post-modern scientific materialism as a mediocre anti-metaphysical position, a rigid paradigm, a disbelief system. These modern pseudo-philosophers are the new priesthood of what Robert Anton Wilson calls, The New Inquisition. Take a look around you. Who do you know who really questions the obvious cover-ups and lies of the government and the mass-media? Who do you know who really thinks, who has genuine philosophical inquiry, who has a real learning process, who wants to renew cosmological and ontological metaphysics beyond beliefs and disbeliefs? Take a look around you. Really look. Who is not brain-dead, just mindlessly staring in a dreamy state of anxious hedonism without depth, without inquiry or higher human development of awareness, intuition and extrasensory perception? Who do you know who is searching for the real history of Earth and humanity or the full cosmic facts of extraterrestrial humanities? Take a real look at the hypnotized zombies all around you, including those you are personally attached to. Have you not painfully noticed how flat and boring, superficial and gossipy, most of your family, friends and associates are? It is like they all want to be assimilated by the Borg so as to avoid even the possibility of waking-up real thinking, individuality and spiritual evolution. They are conformist biological robots who are happily allowing their unused “civil liberties” to be removed by their criminally insane government for the sake of collective pseudo-security on a planet destined to suffer catastrophic loss of petrol/gasoline coupled with runaway global warming. Everywhere all around us is a numb and thoughtless humanity drifting stupidly and heedlessly into mass destruction at the hands of government and the mass media. Philosophy is dying; originary thinking is not being attempted. Anxious, tense and blind materialistic selfishness is everywhere lurching into chaos and destruction. Good thinking and good work are being replaced by nastiness, resentment and corrupt escapism. The average person is losing it, losing whatever was there of intelligence and Spirit. Neurotic and psychotic behavior are on the increase. The Ancient Greek meaning of Truth as Alitheia, the Uncovered, naked Goddess of Truth, is about a passionate inquiry into the real trends of human life and consciousness. Wake it up in yourself with total intensity or you will just go increasingly into the meaningless hell of the stupid masses. If you have enough going for you to read my words, why not take the greater step you now need to take?

Editorial comment: This seems rather long for a comment, but I have approved it all the same - JS, 22 Aug 2010 The Central World Problem - The Human Brain Cannot Do Reality, by Gabriel Chiron When consciousness is incarnated in a human body, it gets reflected in the human brain as pitifully conditioned cognition. This conditioned cognition will itself tend to be hardly more than a node of one or another of the cultural or societal forms of mass hypnosis as a collective belief or disbelief system, which is further modified by governmental or religious propaganda as well as commercial advertising. The cultural or societal shared belief or disbelief system is what is called the Socially Constructed Reality, which gets projected onto the unknown Real Universe or World through virtually all the human brains of a culture, society or cognitive region of the unknown world, the actual global and cosmic Reality. Socially Constructed Realities, SCR’s, are always an admixture of truth and falsity, of reality and illusion, and different SCR’s often support or promote various modes of oppression or warfare toward minority or apposite SCR’s. Each SCR dwells in its own distorted and inadequate partial “Reality” which is either under oppression or attempting to dominate and control the whole of humanity and the future. This is an anal-territorial struggle where the political, business and religious leaders are more or less insane, false and unable to comprehend the actual whole of humanity on Earth and throughout the Universe. The SCR’s, the Socially Constructed Realities, are wretched and conflictatory. So the various world problems (the global problematique) continue to be reinforced by an intellectually and spiritually weak humanity led by a predominance of corrupt, lying, criminally insane abusers of material, technological and military power. Pseudo-Realities are oppressing other Pseudo-Realities, and if a particular Pseudo-Reality overthrows its oppressor and “comes into power”, it will then inevitably begin to oppress its own minority Pseudo-Realities. Real Reality of the Whole never oppresses, nor can it be oppressed; never conquers, nor can it be conquered. Oppression or being oppressed, conquering or being conquered, is only possible for deluded, shallow, prejudiced human brains. All this has happened, is happening and will continue to happen because the human brain of any region of the world cannot do Reality because of its conditioning, its Socially Constructed Reality, its membership in one or another of the forms of debilitated mass hypnosis. Socially Constructed Realities, SCR’s, are always an admixture of truth and falsity, of reality and illusion, and different SCR’s often support or promote various modes of oppression or warfare toward minority or apposite SCR’s. Each SCR dwells in its own distorted and inadequate partial “Reality” which is either under oppression or attempting to dominate and control the whole of humanity and the future. This is an anal-territorial struggle where the political, business and religious leaders are more or less insane, false and unable to comprehend the actual whole of humanity on Earth and throughout the Universe. The SCR’s, the Socially Constructed Realities, are wretched and conflictatory. So the various world problems (the global problematique) continue to be reinforced by an intellectually and spiritually weak humanity led by a predominance of corrupt, lying, criminally insane abusers of material, technological and military power. Pseudo-Realities are oppressing other Pseudo-Realities, and if a particular Pseudo-Reality overthrows its oppressor and “comes into power”, it will then inevitably begin to oppress its own minority Pseudo-Realities. Real Reality of the Whole never oppresses, nor can it be oppressed; never conquers, nor can it be conquered. Oppression or being oppressed, conquering or being conquered, is only possible for deluded, shallow, prejudiced human brains. All this has happened, is happening and will continue to happen because the human brain of any region of the world cannot do Reality because of its conditioning, its Socially Constructed Reality, its membership in one or another of the forms of debilitated mass hypnosis. Will you, the individual, now awaken yourself more completely and thoroughly from any socially constructed or conditioned belief, disbelief or form of social identification that still possesses your consciousness and deforms your cognitive neurosystem? Are you willing to totally question your assumptions about yourself, others and your world? Will you question your current paradigm or mental model of any important subject of your concern? Will you break down your present worldview or cosmogony into its fundamental elements and restructure it into a better, more open-ended whole that accommodates new or apposite elements that you have habitually excluded without real knowledge and understanding? For instance, if you are a conditioned Christian, Technological Atheist or Illuminati Satanist of the New World Order, try finding some verses in the Koran that might show you how you are losing a necessary higher connection with something like a Ruling Spirit or Overlord. If you are a conditioned Muslim, try reading the Bhagavad Geeta and see where it might help you come to a more personal Yoga or Self-realization system beyond outer social and religious duties. If you are a Hindu, try looking deeply into various teachings of Buddhism that could take your entire cosmogony and throw it into a whole new perspective beyond both Hinduism and Buddhism as such. What is the greater reality beyond karma and reincarnation as such without falling below the causal level into silly beliefs in one life only followed by eternal Heaven or Hell, or without falling into a purely materialistic perspective that says our mortal physical existence is all we have followed by an ignoble and meaningless extinction of a biological robot that imagined it was a “self” or that actually incarnated an imaginary thing called “consciousness”? Will you see for yourself that your conditioned human brain cannot do Reality, but only some pathetic, limited distortion? Yet it can reflect more and more clearly with less and less distortion, which is by learning to deconstruct and reconstruct its mental model, paradigm, worldview and cosmogony over and over again. This cycle is what can truly be called Learning. It is Learning, in the truest and most extensive meaning of that word, that alone solves the Central World Problem, which is the inadequacy of the human cognitive system, both personally and collectively. Will you, the individual, go beyond your social self, your conditioning, and explore your higher and more truly free Learning Self? The social self of cognition in and through the human brain is delusion, illusion, stupidity, bondage and future shock, future suffering. It is the proud, witty, nasty and foolish evolutionary stagnation of an actual loser in the Real Cosmic World. It is a failure to awaken to the Learning Self that can truly improve the body and the immediate world through more enlightened consciousness, thinking, speech and behavior. The Learning Self has less and less prejudice. That self studies and appreciates whatever new truth-elements it finds in all the world’s greatest traditions and thinkers. That self listens carefully to what intelligent extraterrestrial contactees have been told by intelligent extraterrestrial people, such as the Ummo’s and the Iargan’s, just for starters, for there is no good or sufficient reason to limit one’s perspective to earthbound sources only. Mahayana Buddhism, for instance, was an update of Buddhism by Nagarjuna, who was a wise, illuminated contactee of the Nagas, the extraterrestrials. Not all Serpent People, “Reptilians”, eat people. Some are stupendous, kindly and compassionate Siddhayogis and Gurus of high evolutionary development, which Nagarjuna happily discovered. The great, original and fantastic inner truths are triggered by the more far-out and controversial outer truths from Extraterrestrial (ET) and Ultraterrestrial (UT) sources. Inner and Outer Truth work together as a virtuous causal feedback loop within the heightened awareness of a Learning Self. Real Learning thus promotes Superconscious experiencing and understanding in oneself and in those receptive to your superconsciousness if and when it is awake and active. Hence it is Real Learning and Superconsciousness that alone help the world. It is Learning and Supercosciousness that will survive and thrive through the cosmic mass oppressions and destructions being promoted by criminally insane leaders such as the Bilderbergers, Neocons and the like. It is Learning and Superconsciousness that participate harmoniously in the Cosmic Command that brings an increasing Divine and Cosmic intervention that will cut short the wrong plans and abusive global actions of perverse and stupid leaders on the Earth. This can and should be seen by you or any individual entering into Learning and Superconsciousness. It is not merely a matter of believing-in what I or anyone else is saying about all this. The force of growing and clarifying inner and outer Truth is the authority here. No Earthbound religion, culture, society or political ideology is going to conquer and control the whole of humanity and the global Earth. Any collective, militant aspiration of that kind is deluded and doomed to failure because it is a violation of Cosmic Law. Neither the Americans, the Russians, the Chinese nor the Muslims will achieve global domination nor culturally survive in their present form. All four of these twisted, perverse and ignorant secular and cultural military power centers are in a futile fourfold shoot-out with one-another. They are like four contorted, angry and ugly faces of Brahma, the Time God or Creator of the Earth, the Creator and Maintainer of the four most dominant Socially Constructed Realties of Mass Hypnosis on the planet, including Israel as an aspect of America and India as an aspect of China. The human brain is unable to register Cosmic Reality in any of these struggling global factions. Do you want to help the World? Then purge and reform your body and its habits, merge your mind with the learning cycle of repeated deconstruction and reconstruction, and teach your consciousness to rise into superconsciousness through Zen, Yoga and the Sufi Way. Get serious about possible human evolution, beginning with yourself. Now, since this article is written in English and made available on the Web, the majority of its readers will be stupidly suffering within one of four main Socially Constructed Realities or collective mass hypnosis delusions of the Time: 1. The Christian 2. The New World Order Illuminati Satanism 3. Modern Hedonistic Technological Atheism 4. New Age Healerism and Spiritual Self-importance, including Extraterrestrial Channelism. If you are therefore identified with any one of these four deluded groupings, you have no meaningful comprehension whatsoever of other groupings on the Earth or in the Extraterrestrial Universe at large. If any of these four deluded groupings has a predominance in your thinking and consciousness you are not yet really thinking nor have you actually achieved genuine consciousness as such. There is a way out of the cognitive trap in which your consciousness is embedded, distorted and darkened. The way out, as I have already said, is through relentless questioning of your assumptions about yourself, others and your world. By clarifying to yourself and within yourself what a cognitive trap or Socially Constructed Reality is actually doing to you, by seeing how it keeps you rotting and stagnating in a proud and stupid social selfhood, you awaken from it. Remember: if your brain thinks in English, then one of the four above cognitive blind conditionings is most probably having a deluding and controlling effect on your mind that you do not normally see. 1. If you are Christian dominated, you will always secretly feel guilty about your awakening intellect, your natural desires and your intuition of spiritual truth beyond the boring, tired old Scriptures. 2. If you are New World Order dominated, you will always feel that you must always say and do what is “politically correct” and pleasing to the political and business leaders, even where you can increasingly see that they are stupid, corrupt liars who are making bad decisions in their spheres of responsibility. You will fear being ostracized if you speak up too boldly about World Problems or obvious wrong-doing. You are always trying to avoid being branded a “Conspiracy Theorist” or disruptive crank. 3. If you are Hedonistic Technological Atheist dominated, you always believe that you have to explain to anyone and everyone that your current Metaphysical or Extraterrestrial concerns, studies and activities are “scientific” and well within the parameters of cognitive neuro-philosophy, as if you have to convince Dan Dennett that you are O.K. 4. If you are New Age dominated, you will always believe that you have to make your mark on the outer social spiritual scene as a “healer” or “in-teacher-counselor” with a growing following. You will tend to be obsessed with your social self-image and how many people want your personal attention and “help”. You are more concerned with appearing “wise” and “advanced” than you are with Learning and Superconsciousness. Do what you will, you always find yourself revolving around “spiritual” socializing, gossip and “who’s who” in the New Age scene. Can you see and feel where and how your own puppet masters make you dance to the tune of their false authority where you believe you have too much to lose by stepping personally beyond a common cognitive boundary? Do you now understand that there is no way out socially, no collective grouping or social movement on the Earth that you can join for your awakening and liberation? This is an utterly private and personal revolution in your own consciousness and selfhood. Existentially, you become an authentic and resolute originary thinker, as Martin Heidegger pointed out in Being and Time. Spiritually, you become an Avadhut, an Outsider, or what the Amerindians called a Contrary. Like Krishnamurti, you are no longer contained in a religion, tradition or ideology, but you certainly do not cling to Krishnamurti or any of his old followers at the Krishnamurti Schools or the publishers of his teachings. This does not mean you cannot learn from a Cosmic Teacher, but such a being does not advertise, has no courses, seminars or cult to join. In fact, if you cannot respectfully learn from such a being, you are probably still caught up in the pseudo-independence of your bodily habits and mental conditioning. Only a Real Learner can learn something necessary from a Real Teacher, only a Superconscious Beginner can learn from a more advanced and developed Superconscious being. Take a truly fresh look at both the state of the World and your own higher possibilities. Have you seen the full truth of your present way of life and where it is leading you? Have you looked deeply into the heart and core of all your usual relationships as to where the others in your life keep tugging you to go? How much do you allow the World of stupid, degenerate and foolish normalcy to worry you, anger you or depress you to the point of just curling-up uselessly in meaningless pleasures or keep-busy chores? Do you really know what is happening to you, to others in your life and to humanity as a whole? Or do you just pretend to know to avoid the pain of searching, questioning, studying strange books and disrupting your ordinary routines? There is a much greater truth than anything you presently possess within your present mind or physical brain. This is a cosmic fact and you have to face it sooner or later. How much you face it and what you will or will not personally do about greater truth when you come to it are going to remain the biggest issues in your life. If you want a better world, you must first become a better self, a learning self, with an unfolding and developing superconsciousness or heightened awareness. This means you will discover steps to take about yourself, your life and your future that you have been avoiding for a very long time or which had never occurred to you at all. You will be exploring some huge unknowns, not just intellectually, bur personally, experimentally. This can make your usual everyday self rather uncomfortable and insecure; other people in your life will also become uncomfortable, insecure and even threatening or condemnatory toward you, which can become psychologically difficult for you; commitments you have made with your old social self may not be upheld by your new Learning Self. Again and again you will feel internally and externally pressured to crawl back and hide in your old conditioned beliefs, disbeliefs and routine activities. Therefore, it requires a great deal of inner strength and courage to wake yourself up and live a real life that is no longer just another cog in one of the big social machines of the World of fragmentary human ignorance and false authority. Assuming that you are prepared to genuinely and thoroughly, seriously, enter into the true learning cycle with your most conscious intention, you will have to discover how very physical, bioneurological, conditioned belief and skepticism both are. Hidden controlling prejudices that dominate your personal thinking and decision-making are not merely abstract, verbal and mental, but are incredibly physical, not just in the brain and nervous system, but in the cells of your body, including your very bones. Memories and conditioning pervade all the cells in your body right down into the atomic structure where very digital, automatic, mechanical things happen that border on confirmation of Eliminative Materialism. The less genuinely conscious and free-thinking, the more conditioned and locally prejudiced a human being is, the more mechanical and easy to manipulate that human being is. Erroneous beliefs and disbeliefs are therefore not unlike other bad habits, such as smoking or over-eating. This means that the same kind of personal strategies that overcome and defeat bad habits will be needed to overcome and defeat one’s conditioned prejudices of social selfhood. In many ways, being a normal conformist member of any society or culture is the most dark and deadly bad habit anyone can have. In fact, it is easier to see the Self-harming quality of a bad bodily habit than it is to see the regional self-harming quality of a bodily rooted and reinforced bad mental habit because the bad mental habit seems disassociated from the physical neurosystem when it is actually all too embedded in it. Can you see this and understand how it works in your own mind/body system? Your own body does not want you opening up cognitively to greater truth. Are you prepared to deal with this problem? All the World’s Socially Constructed Realities, its self-destructive prejudices, are unbelievably mechanical, blind and nauseating, rooted right in the cognitive neurosystem, the human brain and throughout the biological and atomic structure of the physical human body. Human beings in general on our suffering planet do not know what is really happening to them or what they are actually doing. The entire globe is very much like a macabre puppet show with over six billion bioneurological puppets unwittingly, awkwardly herking and jerking toward their death and doom without a clue. And each Socially Constructed Robotic Pseudo-Reality feels through all its puppets that it and it alone is the superior view with the superior way of life-habits. Are you personally clear now that the Central World Problem is indeed that the human brain cannot do Reality?

Re: James Sinnamon's comment 'Should be critical of Greens, but not for favouring lesser evil' and Search For Truth's comment 'Bastards' of 21st August 2010: My comment was to highlight the weakness of Australia's undemocratic political system that hinges on the whims of individual personalities like Meg Lees rather than the collective strength of a political organisation like the Australia Democrats. Indeed look at the media-created vulnerability of the political parties associated with John Howard, Tony Abbott, Kevin Rudd, Bob Brown and Pauline Hanson. Extract the leader and what chance to the respective parties have to win election and govern the country. Squat! It is so wrong and weak a system that hangs by the whim of an individual leader's charisma. The ideological and policy differences between Labor and the Liberals are marginal. The differential is down to tactical spending preferences and the entire campaign on both sides has been to differentiate between one another, not to prove a better national vision or capacity to deliver that vision. I expect to wake up Sunday morning to another Labor era and with the Liberals in leadership turmoil again. The fundamental reason is that Labor has sold its $20 million donator funded propaganda targeting selfish personal hip pocket insecurity, and that this has been more effective than the Liberals propaganda of aspiring to better national financial governance. At the ballot box voters' hip pocket is overwhelming. Labor will have conned most despite its excessive spending, delivery incompetence, state-based wrath and voter distrust. So it will be a hip pocket outcome, but nothing to do with different ideologies or visions. LibLabs are just a factional variant of the same political ideology. But I am not trying to convince anyone to vote either way, just to question their assumptions and to be mindful that most vote with their hip pocket and so must accept the consequences - personal gain, national pain! Yes, so long as the electoral process remains undemocratically biased toward those in power, the LibLab cycle will continue.

I can't agree that the electors are principally responsible for the likely outcome of an election with such poor choices on offer. As has been raised many times on this site, neither of the two major parties nor their main alternatives such as the Greens have offered the electors any true alternative to the pro-corporate 'free market' policies which have guided the destiny of this country for the last three decades. None, not even the Labor Party under Julia Gillard, has come out clearly and unambiguously for population stability. No-one is campaigning strongly for the basic human right denied to millions of Australians, that is, the right for secure affordable shelter. What was once affordable to ordinary Australians, little more than a generation ago - a free-standing home - is now only affordable to people on high incomes or those who have inherited family homes. If voters aren't given a real choice and if the reporting of the election is as poor as it has been, is it any wonder that so many voters are apathetic?

(Subject was: "Bastards" - admin) The bastards will always be out there and there will always be bastards in power so long as grass roots apathy and self interest reigns over common sense. It really does not matter who wins this election we will still have dickheads running the country. The quote “In a Democracy, the people get the government they deserve” certainly rings true here in this country. Without constitutional change the cycle just continues.

Thanks, John, for your response to my comment. I happen to agree that the Greens and, in their time, the Democrats were, at best, seriously flawed political parties. In 2010, the Greens have failed again to offer voters alternative policies so desperately needed. (Apart from the crucial issue of population stability, perhaps the most needed is a policy to make secure affordable housing a guaranteed right for all citizens. That only a few less well known Greens, and not their leaders, are even prepared to occasionally raise this issue confirms to me that the Greens aren't seriously concerned that millions of Australians have been denied this most basic of human rights.) However, I don't think that any political party should be automatically condemned for stating that it views one of the major parties as a lesser evil to the other as the Greens have implicitly done by preferencing Labor over the Liberals. Indeed, in the article "Don't give Abbott mandate to inflict misery" of 20 August, I have put my case as to why I believe that a re-elected Gillard Labor Government will be less harmful to the interests of Australians than a newly elected Abbott Coalition govenment. Essentially the reason is that an incoming Coalition Government is far more likely than a re-elected Labor Government to come up with excuses not put during the election campaign to ignore implied or explicit policy commitments made during the election campaign (as John Howard did during the 1996 election campaign) only to subsequently 'discover' an economy in far worse state than they were prepared to acknowledge during the election campaign. The way that elected governments routinely enact policies against the wishes of the public on whose behalf they are supposedly governing (as for example the Queensland Bligh Labor Government is now ignoring the wishes of well over 70% of Queenslanders opposed to its sell-off of $16 billion worth of publicly owned assets) or John Howard ignored public opposition to the introduction of the GST) shows that Australia is not a democratically governed country in any true sense. All the same, in spite of the fact that neither major party has shown itself willing to govern in the interests of the people of this country, a case can still be made in some elections for one or the other being the likely lesser evil as we have done. So, whilst John Marlowe, you are rightly harshly critical of the Greens, your condemnation of the Greens for preferencing Labor over the Liberals has not swayed me.

And in so doing, Meg Lees betrayed and accelerated the demise of the Democrats. Selling out to Labor meant that only The Greens became a viable force to keep the LibLab bastards honest. Now we see The Greens preferencing Labor.

(The following comment was posted by me to Life Matters just now.) The claim that the GST was introduced by the supposedly farsighted Howard government in 1999 against the unreasonable resistance of a timid electorate fearful of change was misleading. The introduction of the GST is an example of how our parliamentary system can and has been manipulated to impose policies harmful to the country and which serve a vested minority interest. Prior to the 1996 election, John Howard promised never to introduce a GST. Only the sham inquiry into "tax reform" set up by Howard after he came to government gave him the excuse to break that commitment just prior to the 1999 elections. Even then he lost the popular vote 48.5% to 51.5% on a two party preferred basis ( although still winning a majority of seats in the house of Representatives). The vote against Howard and the GST was even greater in the Senate. It would have been even greater if so much information, shown, after the elections to have been misleading, had not been fed to voters. It was only because Senator Meg Lees and the majority of Democrats Senators went against the wishes of the electorate and Democrats members that Howard was able to impose the GST. This policy has harmed us economically and is only one of many examples I could give of how Australia's political system is not democratic in practice.

My article "Don't give Abbott mandate to inflict misery" of 20 August gives examples of how Australia's electoral system falls a long way short of what would be real democracy. Any system that allows elected representatives to harm both our short term and longer term interests in the way that most Federal, state and local governments of both major political parties have in the last three decades against the known wishes of the public or, at best, without their informed consent is not democratic by my understanding. What is needed is a Swiss style system which allows any proposal gaining the support of a designated number of signatories (100,000 of the 7,000,000 population of Switzerland) to be put to the people in a binding national referendum. Referendum questions can also be put to regions of the country. Such a provision in Australia's constitution would probably have prevented most Australian government decisions which were harmful to our interests.

great stuff and hope that Dalidakis et al wakes up and listens to this outcome... the organisation is NOT to be used for tax purposes and creating wealth for his own share base AND forestry company that im sure there is some-where to be found, it is so transparent. WHAT WOULD YOUR LOVELY CHILDREN THINK ABOUT THIS I WOULD CARE TO ASK YOU IN TEN YEARS TIME!!

Japan is party to the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugee Convention. Japan has faced criticism that its restrictive policy towards refugees within its borders is contrary to its obligations under the Refugee Convention and the Convention Against Torture. Japan's refugee recognition rate for 2001 was a mere 3.8%. In 2000, Australia's refugee recognition rate was 93%, that of Canada was 89%, and that of the United States was 67%. For example, in 2001, only seventy-eight people applied for refugee protection. Japan has signed the international refugee treaty. but their intake that has numbers in single digit figures per annum. It is reported that about 60,000 Chinese students and trainees were in Japan from 1989 to 1990, but surprisingly, few of them applied for refugee recognition. At the same time, Japan has a declining population growth rate! Japan is over 70% mountainous terrain with approximately only 18% of the land mass suitable for settlement due to landslides, forestation, and generally mountainous terrain. However, they could just as easily adapt these impediments just as easily as Australia is being pushed to adapt to outback desert living and infertile soils. Japan buys our woodchips are bargain basement prices but protects their own forests! Businessman Dick Smith says he doesn't understand those who suggest populating remote parts of Australia to house our growth. "We could put five Dubais between Sydney and Cairns and we could run it for a couple of hundred years by using every bit of oil, every bit of uranium we had...but why would you be that mad? What's the advantage?" Australia's population growth rate, our arid land, our poor soils, our water scarcity, our large distances in light of peak oil, and the threat of climate change, means that we are impeded in accommodating a large number of refugees. Japan maintains their cultural purity, and their economy and their natural resources for themselves!

In an ideal world we would not need to consider the imposition of fertility control but unfortunately our world is far from ideal. We have organisations like the Vatican in the ear of third world governments telling them they will go to hell if they provide their population with contraception. We have corrupt governments that don't care if their country is over populated and many of their people suffer greatly due to over population. Instead of confronting the over population elephant in the room back in the 50s and 60s, the west chose to ignore it and instead embark of the 'green revolution' which as ultimately made over population and the associated human suffering worse by causing the global population to triple from 2 billion to 6 billion. As far as proving family planning to the third world, I fear we have missed that boat by about 40 years or so.

If you listen to her speeches you can decipher some of her double talk. She uses expressions in a different way from most people. "Sustainable Population" What we assume it means: stopping population growth entirely, stabilizing the population. What it means to Julia: maintaining rapid population growth indefinitely - just make sure there's enough infrastructure in place for all the new arrivals "Big Australia" What we assume it means: An Australian population in excess of ~30 million people. What it means to Julia: the term "Big Australia" has no reference to the actual number of people. It just means that too many people are concentrated in the existing major cities. So just expand the growing population into what are currently rural or wilderness areas - then you could have 100 million+ people but it would still qualify as "Small Australia".

Julia Gillard has emphatically denied a returned Labor government would put the brakes on economic growth by cutting migration. Her plan is to reduce immigration as part of a promise to deliver "a sustainable Australia". Describing herself as a supporter of immigration, Ms Gillard, born in Wales, said targets had to be set according to economic circumstances. What about peak oil, peak water, peak soil, and peak humans? Economic without considering climate change and sustainability is simply "business as usual"! With such contradictory double talk, can we really trust her?

Provision of contraceptives and family planning services to the third world is great in theory but, with the global population expected to peak at 9 billion plus, I suspect we have missed that boat on account of ignoring this particular elephant in the room for so long. Instead of pursuing Norman Borlaug's 'green revolution' back in the 50s - 70s we should have addressed global hunger with family planning back then. The logistical task and economic cost of providing family planning services to 2 billion plus impoverished people are truly herculean and I am pessimistic that it can be done in time to avert a human catastrophe of unprecedented proportions for all of us, including those of us in the west. Corrupt and authoritarian governments may prevent the provision of family planning services to their impoverished people, but that will get far worse as the population climbs towards 9 billion plus. In addition the Vatican is in the ear of many of these governments. Hard and unpallatable choices are going to have to be made, or I fear our modern civilisation will be a casualty of the coming global over population catastrophe.

Australians mindful of the LibLab electoral platforms and not content with them ought to vote alternatively - outside the LibLab square so to speak.

Informal voting is counterproductive in all respects, since its sends no voter message to future government - supportive or dismissive.

At least voting for an alternative, there is a message sent.
But then if you vote LibLab you must be resolutely happy with LibLab solutions for Australia.

NB. Personally I do not see how preferencing Australian cultural values in an Australian election could be construed to be 'nationalistic baggage', unless one has a foreign agenda.

In 2000, world leaders came together and developed a blueprint for halving extreme poverty by 2015 - the Millennium Development Goals. The agreement committed developed countries (including Australia) to giving 0.7 per cent of their gross national income to overseas development aid. Since 1990, the proportion of people living in extreme poverty has dropped from 42 per cent to 19 per cent. This is an unprecedented victory, but more is needed. Nearly a quarter of a billion people escaped slums in the past decade, but the housing effort was outstripped by population growth and rural exodus to the cities, the United Nations said. Sub-Saharan Africa has the largest slum population, totalling 199.5 million people, or 61.7 percent of its urban population. It is followed by South Asia (190.7 million people, 35 percent of urban population) and East Asia (189.6 million, 28.2 percent). Here is an estimated 137 million women who have a need for family planning which is not currently being met. Furthermore, it has been reported that there are 87 million per year unintended, mistimed or unwanted pregnancies. This number can be reduced dramatically by increasing knowledge and access to contraception. However, it is important to realise that without addressing the issue of gender inequality in many countries, many of these unwanted pregnancies will continue to occur. There is an estimated 137 million women who have a need for family planning which is not currently being met. Furthermore, it has been reported that there are 87 million per year unintended, mistimed or unwanted pregnancies. This number can be reduced dramatically by increasing knowledge and access to contraception. However, it is important to realise that without addressing the issue of gender inequality in many countries, many of these unwanted pregnancies will continue to occur Sub-Saharan Africa is disastrously far from meeting any of it development goals. Despite aiming to reduce the number of people living in extreme poverty to 27 per cent of 1990 levels, efforts have only managed to reduce that number from 57 to 51 per cent in the past 20 years. Sub-Saharan Africa is disastrously far from meeting any of it development goals. Despite aiming to reduce the number of people living in extreme poverty to 27 per cent of 1990 levels, efforts have only managed to reduce that number from 57 to 51 per cent in the past 20 years. There are more than 100 million more destitute souls in the region than in 1990. Statistics for infant mortality and childbirth death rates are just as bad. Too many people, rich and poor, to sustain for this planet. Australia is infamous for our rate of biodiversity loss, plants and animals going extinct every year. Natural impediments to population growth were overcome, at least for the medium term, with the industrial revolution and modern medicine. It is not only the church that is blocking progress. Whether it's a muslim woman in Saudi Arabia denied the right to work, a Chinese infant murdered because she can't carry on a surname to appease the ancestors or a Christian woman in Africa forced to bear her 8th child, a child she cannot afford to feed or immunise, because contraception is apparently contrary to Government policies. Hundreds of millions of people in developing countries are denied access to birth control. Major upgrading of Australia's pitiful support for the United Nations Population Fund and non-government organisations working on population is vitally important in achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Too many people, rich and poor, to sustain for this planet. Australia is infamous for our rate of biodiversity loss, plants and animals going extinct every year. Natural impediments to population growth were overcome, at least for the medium term, with the industrial revolution and modern medicine. World Vision’s family planning guidelines "encourage both men and women to take equal responsibility for their children’s birth and development." These objectives are consistent with the UN Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5, which are to "reduce child mortality and improve maternal health respectively". However, reducing child mortality and improved maternal health is not contraption! All contraceptive methods promoted by World Vision are reviewed with respect to ethical, medical and development standards. World Vision programs provide integrated voluntary family planning services that offer a range of natural and artificial methods. Australian and international NGOs will continue to be able to choose what services they deliver in line with their philosophies and policies.

Secure affordable housing as a human right has been barely discussed in the election campaign. Some Greens candidates, although none of their leaders, as far as I can tell, have raised this as an election issue but with little depth or detail. The Greens are the supposed humanitarian and radical alternative to the major pro-business parties. That this most critical of human needs now denied to such a large number of Australian citizens is barely visible in the election campaign is an illustration of how our elections fall a long way short of a true exercise in democracy.

"As a whole, Europe will lose more than 60 million people over the next five decades. The remaining population will be much older than any other population in world history. In terms of demography, Europe is entering uncharted territory. What it will mean to live in country where there are as many people over the age of 80 as there are people under the age of 20 is hard to imagine, but many Europeans countries will soon find out. The challenges of this demographic change are going to be enormous". The Australian. www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/europe-shows-the-alternative-to-growth-is-decline/story-e6frg6zo-1225895851365 If Europe is suffering with a population decline and supposed economic decline then why are so many people trying to get into Europe from Africa rather than the other way around. Population increases correlate with poverty and displacement. Ultimately there must be a break from the massive population growth the world has undergone since discovering the power of industry and fossil fuels, and the advantages of transport and a spread of knowledge. Nobody wants to be the one to break the addiction to growth! Europe with their "stagnant" population are much more ready for climate change than the nations with massive growth! Australia is decades behind in terms of preparing for 21st century technology and a carbon-free future. The pro-growth demographic "solution" to the great ageing population threat, due to population stability, is the proposal to make the problem even bigger and push it down the road to our grandchildren so we can more easily enjoy the present time? Like all ponzi schemes it will all come crashing down one day. Let us not forget that today's retirees were yesterdays immigrants.

Vinnies (St Vincent de Paul Society mission) highlights the four main emerging groups of homeless as women and children, families, young people and over 55s. This is not the traditionally homeless group! Homelessness Australia has reported that families with children are the fastest growing group of people experiencing homelessness in Australia with more than 16 per cent of Australia’s 105,000 homeless in this group – stating one of the main causes as lack of affordable housing. The Salvation Army Media release July 2010 says: Across NSW, The Salvation Army has recorded a massive 65% increase in the number of people who report being homeless or sleeping rough, in cars or tents. The numbers have increased from around 1,200 people in 2008 to nearly 2,000 people in 2010. “Most of these people have family members including children living with them, making the actual numbers of people at least two to three times higher,” says Salvation Army spokesperson, Rhonda Gregory. They say that this highlights that those we assist may still be struggling from the effects of the economic downturn. No mention of the massive increase in population growth, and it's social costs, to present citizens of Australia! Figures show the WA Department of Housing has a waiting list approaching 24,000 people. Every night in WA more than 14,000 people are homeless. Rockingham Seventh-day Adventist Church is throwing open its doors to the underprivileged, and providing soup and buns. This is happening instead of disaster relief! Overwhelmed charities in Sydney are turning away dozens of homeless people a night. Wesley Mission, which has housed 1536 homeless people this year - a 15 per cent rise on last year - reported turning away 35 people on average every night from centres in Sydney, the Central Coast and Newcastle. Sydney has recorded a 22 per cent increase in those sleeping rough. Key agencies estimated there were now well over 100,000 Australians homeless on any given night, a figure broadly conceded by government. When Rudd was Prime Minister he declared war on a problem he described as being a "national obscenity". There was no mention of his responsibility due to his massive rise in immigration rate and demand for housing that meant that many Australians have been locked out our home ownership and private rentals due to the "shortages" of land and houses! Home ownership prices have simply outstripped wages! They population myth that growth brings prosperity is easily dismissed as false!

This link discusses parties that are opposed to mass migration (our main source of population growth) and those that favour it or are ambivalent. www.independentaustralian.com.au/node/73 The Stable Population Party of Australia, which comes with no nationalistic baggage, was unable to stand under its party name, because Julia Gillard called the election a few days before it would have qualified. However, if you live in NSW, you can vote for Senate Group T to get the same people and policies. If you vote 1 for them above the line, their preferences put the major parties last.

This comment argues that the imposition of lower rates of fertility upon a large proportion of humankind is likely to become inevitable, due to the nature of governments and of overpopulation. Consider, however, that humans are very often prevented from organising socially to avoid high immigration or high birth rates by undemocratic governments, with the awful consequence of overpopulation. The U.N. says:
"At least 200 million women want to use safe and effective family planning methods, but are unable to do so because they lack access to information and services or the support of their husbands and communities. And more than 50 million of the 190 million women who become pregnant each year have abortions. Many of these are clandestine and performed under unsafe conditions. The need for voluntary family planning is growing fast, and it is estimated that the 'unmet need' will grow by 40 per cent during the next 15 years. But even though it is an economically sound investment, family planning has been losing ground as an international development priority. Funding is decreasing, and the gap between the need and the available resources is growing. The international community has agreed that reproductive choice is a basic human right. But without access to relevant information and high-quality services, that right cannot be exercised."
So, if these unmet democratic needs were met, would the spectre of harshly imposed population control ever arise? Copyright notice: Reproduction of this material is encouraged as long as the source is acknowledged.

"No one is immune to it; in some respects it is the foundation of our lives. Magical thinking is a universal affliction. We see what we want to see, deny what we don't. Confronted by uncomfortable facts, we burrow back into the darkness of our cherished beliefs. We will do almost anything – cheat, lie, stand for high office, go to war – to shut out challenges to the way we see the world." - George Monbiot, Guardian, 17 August 2010 The Victorian Government between 1885-1905 made world-first legislation vesting all water and river banks in the Crown. Irrigators paid for the water they used. They had no rights over water. Graziers leased the riverbanks annually. This lasted fifty years. If the government still owned the water, it would not have to buy back the rights that were given away since then. It is just not irrigators who own the 'rights' - as they sell the rights, it is big multinationals and foreign interests who buy them - And with all the money and power those rights represent, what could the government not do! The economists with their water trading complexities assume that the market will find the best use of water – no way, it is just who can pay the most. http://adbonline.anu.edu.au/biogs/A050368b.htm http://home.vicnet.net.au/~ozideas/water.htm val yule

Sooner or later a time will come when global security and stability will be so severely impacted by the combined threats of over population and global warming that the community of nations will need to and be willing to consider more confronting means of halting runaway population growth. Already there is technology available to build entirely new and novel species of bacteria by building a genome from the ground up. So it would be entirely feasible to use this technology to modify an existing bacteria species to act as a self replicating and self administering 'pill' to reduce the over all fertility of the human species. An appropriate gene for oestrogen could be inserted into the genome of common but relatively harmless bacteria species. Candidates might be Chlamydia, passed on through sexual intercourse, or possibly Staphylococcus aureus, part of the normal skin flora and passed on through casual contact. Their oestrogen secretion could prevent ovulation in woman, in the same way that 'the pill' works, as well as probably reducing the sperm count in males. We already recognize the need for these sorts of techniques to control populations of various animals confined to national parks. It is about time we applied the same standards and principals to ourselves for the greater good of our civilisation and our descendants. Such a method would be as fair as possible and be akin to 'drawing straws' with westerners being at equal risk of picking up the bacterium as third-worlders, on an individual basis. But over all the third world would bear a larger burden commensurate with is larger contribution to over population. One alternative is to leave the matter to an indifferent Gaia which will eventually restore the ecological balance through famine, disease, war and genocide etc. The other alternative is regulation of reproduction by governments which would be prone to ethnic favoritism. It is time that the human race 'grew up' and out of its religious naivety about our place within Gaia and the limits that we are subject to.

"Migration program should focus on political and climate asylum and reunions". Sorry, I disagree! First, asylum seekers are defined as those who can't live in their own country due to religious, political or social discrimination or persecution. If we add "climate" refugees, we could open the flood gates, and there will be millions of displaced people wanting to migrate from overpopulated countries. We ourselves are predicted to be hard hit by climate change, and we already have limited carrying capacity due to lack of regular water, already over-irrigated river systems, poor soils and urban sprawl. We in Australia do not have reciprocal resettlement alternatives. Secondly, "family reunions" can be easily exploited. I know from my own experience, stories of divorce, a new marriage in the country of birth, and then the new spouse brings his/her distance relatives, often on borrowed money that isn't paid back. Families "help" financially to bring out relatives, and are then broken due to unpaid expenses. Marriages have been used as a scam to get residence into Australia, and distant relatives put pressure, emotionally, to come to Australia. People have paid to get married for residence. Some of the people brought here to Australia in the past - and I won't name the nation - were totally unsuitable for settlement. There have been too many rorts in the past, with peasants quite content with living marginally and taking advantage of our generous social security and housing benefits. Family reunions mean that the same type of people end up in Australia! Let's just keep the status of "refugees" the way it is now.

Its a well known rule of thumb that a 2% constant growth rate quadruples a population every 70 years. For simplicity assume our population is now 25 million (we are very close to that I think): 70 years - 100 million 140 years - 400 million 210 years - 1.6 billion Thats right - at our current growth rates, which most of our business leaders and economists absolutely love - we will reach China-like population levels within 200 years. This is not very long in historical terms. If we halve it - which our business leaders and economists would bitterly resist - we will probably reach 200-250 million in the same timeframe. None of these people really want an Australia of 200 million or a billion or more people, but at the same time they don't want Australia's population to ever stop growing. You can't have it both ways - either plan to stop Australia's growth very soon, or plan for an Australia of hundreds of millions of people.

According to Peter Hunt, we are not currently having a real population debate!! Unless we agree with his pro-growth, big business perspective, unless we confine ourselves to discussion of how we will grow (as opposed to if we want to grow), then we are really not having a debate. This absurdistan view was recently promoted by Murdoch's News Limited Weekly Times as "Time for population debate" August 16, 2010, an opinion article by Peter Hunt, who begins his propaganda with, "It is time to start genuine debate about the Big Australia policy." Does Mr Hunt think we are all stupid? Or is his job really selling real estate?

Population Minister, Mr Burke, recently said there would come a time when we had to acknowledge that some of the land going into building houses would be better preserved for food production. Isn't this time now? What is he waiting for? Half or more of the population unable to afford fresh food? Jenny Warfe is so far ahead of our current ministers that not-voting for her would be stupid.

You can contact Warren at [email protected]. His office number is 07 40318030 and if you wish to send a fax, you may send it to 07 40318839. Warren's campaign office is situated at 5/192 Mulgrave Road WESTCOURT. The postal address is PO Box 545 BUNGALOW QLD 4870 Endangered species should be protected, and there should be no exception for Native Title. Please commend him for his promise of funds, but to protect sea turtles and dugongs from atrocities, the black market and from extinctions, the laws need to be consistent for ALL PEOPLE, and no exceptions for indigenous peoples. How many really live from hunting and gathering like their ancestors? None, I would guess.

Very witty poem, Search for Truth. You may be interested to know that it's been two weeks since I wrote a letter to the Mayor asking for clarification on what my inaccurate statements actually were. His secretary printed out my email and gave it to him. As of today I still have not heard back from him and would not be surprised if I never did. My point is that he doesn't have a leg to stand on otherwise he would have replied. If any of my statements are in fact incorrect (and can be proved to be with valid links), I welcome correction. "It’s embarrassing for Australia that we eat our own wildlife ....I’m here to tell you it’s just not right. Simply do not buy, use or eat kangaroo products” ~ Steve Irwin Sign the most important petition ever created to help kangar

Bob Irwin has applauded a Coalition plan to sink an extra $2.6 million into dugong and sea turtle protection. Conservationists, traditional owners and the fishing industry agree not enough is being done to prevent dugongs and turtles from being killed in Far North Queensland’s waters. Outspoken Cairns animal activist Colin Riddell hugged Leichhardt LNP candidate Warren Entsch yesterday after his party's environment spokesman, Greg Hunt, made the announcement. The plan, to boost indigenous ranger programs to stop illegal and turtle poaching, and for programs to clean up marine debris, was among several green policies announced by the Coalition in Cairns yesterday. Mr Hunt also promised: $3 million in grants for farmers, in addition to existing programs, to help reduce pesticide run-off into the Great Barrier Reef. $2 million for an "eradication plan" for the Crown of Thorns starfish, a major pest on the Great Barrier Reef. $250,000 for two "Green Army" projects employing 20 people to rehabilitate 80ha of Cape Tribulation and Cape York rainforest. Lobbying to protect endangered animals have fallen on deaf ears for too long. Those blatantly ignoring the issue include Environment Minister Peter Garrett and Senator Bob Brown! No endangered animals should be trapped or killed, even for "traditional" reasons, and no creatures should suffer the atrocities being reported to gentle turtles and dugongs.

I have listened to both candidates - they talk about "sustainability" but neither of them have mentioned, at all, the concept of stopping Australia's population growth entirely. If you follow their speeches you can hear carefully steer very clear of the idea. They want Australia's population to grow forever. They are aided by many pundits in the media who seem to think Australia's problems will be solved by a larger population. Oh no they're not arguing for perpetual growth. Just a little more growth and we can stop. Just a little more.

That the extreme waste of bureaucratic duplication and an outmoded governance structure of Australia's States is entrenched - is reason to retrench it, not to subscribe to passive submission. So often I see the herd committed to criticism, while uncommitted to problem solving. Sometimes when riding ahead of the herd, I have to take a look back every now and then to make sure it's still there [borrowed from Will Rogers (1879-1935)].

Sandra Kanck is the former Democrat leader and now part of Sustainable Population Australia. She says the Democrats is the nation’s only environment group campaigning on reducing human population. (The ACF also, but not until mid century). After more than two decades of hammering away at this issue and the spectacular population growth which took place under the auspices of former PM Rudd, it appears Australia now might be on the brink of an outbreak of common sense, Ms Kanck said. The reduction in support for former PM Rudd was based at least in part on the reactions of Australians against his views on increasing our population. With the PM having rejected the targetting of immigration and declining to interfere with the baby bonus, the Australian Democrats are calling on her to reveal just how she will follow through on her vague statements about not favouring a big Australia. Julia Gillard is clearly being deceitful and oblique! However, Lead Senate candidate for the Democrats in SA, Jeanie Walker, says the apparent solution Ms Gillard offering is the deckchairs-on-the-Titanic shuffle. This involves moving people around the countryside without any real attempt to solve the problems of increasing population. The Australian Democrats Press Release Continuing to encourage population growth but locating it in regional areas might put the problem out of sight and out of mind, but it is not a solution. The impacts will be spread out, and the population will consume the same amount of water, need the same amount of timber, power, transport, agriculture and jobs from our fragile and finite resources. The only thing it would do would be to relieve some road congestion, but this would mean more transport, toxic urban sprawl and other impacting infrastructure links across Australia. The Ecological Titanic is still hurtling towards one or all of the many possible icebergs no matter where the deck chairs are! Population increase combined with the impacts of climate change and peak oil will in the long term be a recipe for disaster for Australia.

Is State identity to entrenched in Australian culture? I think youre pushing up hill to bring down the States any time soon.

Dear S-, Firstly thanks for your interest and thoughtful suggestions. I have been largely inactive for three months because of unavoidable personal complications. I am all for protests, marches etc. to put our case against unsustainable population growth. Unfortunately, as you have noted, it is close to election time, so there is little chance to make an impact on the election. Although it is good that for once population growth has been treated as controversial during a national election, the national elections fall a long way short of an exercise in real democracy. The public don't have the option to vote for a platform which clearly and unambiguously supports population stability. Even Gillard and Evans still seem to want to allow Australia's immigration to remain roughly as high as John Howard made it. So, Labor could be re-elected and Australia could still have unsustainable population growth. What is needed are alternative candidates with clear policies on population as well as a large number of other issues where state governments and the federal government have acted against the public interest and public opinion. Another obvious example is privatisation, which has been consistently opposed by an overwhelming majority of Australians for the last few decades. Unfortunately, we can't organise rallies or good election candidates at this stage, but if you know of any, we would be more than happy to publicise them. best regards, James Sinnamon Copyright notice: Reproduction of this material is encouraged as long as the source is acknowledged.

(Ed. Comments welcome below, but, if you want to help the writer of this suggestion organise a rally please let us know by writing to site contact link and we will pass your comments on to the author of the letter below. We as a nation are happy to fully support causes that we believe in. Cure for Cancer, Violence against Women, Black Saturday to name a few. Everyone in Australia is going to be affected one way or another if the Australian Population gets out of control. As Dick Smith said that 9 in every 10 Australians would agree that this is "not" what they want for themselves or their children and grandchildren. If a day and time was chosen for Australians to gather together in each State to make their voices heard and count for something our concerns could not go unnoticed. I am talking about a Nation Rally. It may be too late for this you may think as the election date is quickly approaching is it too late for this to be done? For those who are financially gaining through whatever means whether it be as a builder, a friend of a Minister, Overseas interests, political heavy weights etc etc these people don't care about what a bigger Australia will do to Australians as long as their needs are being met. Well I don't care for them. All I want is to help start this ball rolling and I believe that a Rally will show political leaders, Australians and overseas countries that we will not be ignored, that we have a right to Rally for our beliefs just as we have a right to vote. Rallying is powerfully visual and because of this it will get noticed. It's only too late when we don't fight for our rights. The right to have a standard of living, confidence and security in resource sustainability, etc etc. Lets pick a date and go for it we have more to loose if we don't!! Thank you for your time. I look forward to hearing from you.

If Australia decides to 'shut the gate' to the world's rapidly growing population, in an attempt to maintain our high quality of life - then... Surely Australia should at the very least become a world leader in educating, supporting and assisting developing countries in their struggle to tame excessive population growth.... While dramatically reducing our own excessive consumption and ultimate detrimental impact on our own patch. Education!!! that’s right education - is the real issue here - instead of a family having 10 children wouldn't it make sense to have enough kiddies to sustain the population not constantly increase it to the demise of ourselves, earthlings and our precious little planet. Sort it out you crazy humans!

It should be pointed out to the pollies that ordinary low income people have put their money together to put this court case up and that they (pollies) would be fools to not see the mood change. We the ordinary people have had enough of snow jobs by pollies and Vic Forest over tree felling.

Continued population growth after the optimum human population has been reached cannot be in the interests of the members of society. At best, each member on average, necessarily becomes poorer as a consequence of there being more people to share the resources amongst. On top of that diseconomies of scale caused, for example, by crowded transport infrastructure, crowded accommodation, shopping centres or recreation facilities makes each of us poorer still on average than the simple application of mathematical division would indicate. The fact that a minority of growth lobbysists is able to profit whilst society on the whole necessarily becomes poorer is evidence of hw dysfunctional and undemocratic any society ruled by politicians who actively encourage population growth must be. Copyright notice: Reproduction of this material is encouraged as long as the source is acknowledged.

Re: 'Comment Power by numbers for cults' 12th August 2010. Charities that seek donations to help increase human population in countries already overpopulated need to start thinking about the message they are sending and their role in perpetuating the over-population problem. Until charities take responsibility for linking their donated millions to birth control, the countries and people that they are supposed to be helping will be forever welfare dependent and worsen the world's population problem. Start with the worst offenders - the top ten overpopulated countries! The top ten countries by population (2009) are: 1. China with 1,338,612,968 2. India with 1,156,897,766 3. United States with 307,212,123 4. Indonesia with 240,271,522 5. Brazil with 190,010,647 6. Pakistan with 174,578,558 7. Bangladesh with 156,050,883 8. Nigeria with 149,229,090 9. Russia with 140,041,247 10. Japan with 127,078,679 Of these, the underdeveloped ones are all but the United States and Japan. To curb the selfish overpopulation burden these underdeveloped countries are imposing on the planet, all charity, foreign aid, and World Bank funding, over and above non-emergency life support, needs to be made conditional on birth control. It is time people stop sending cash to these countries. Do not send unconditional cash! Do not send cash at all! Send solutions! Send condoms, education, vasectomy doctors, provide financial carrots (such as housing) to families with less than 3 children where the father undertakes vasectomy, and other birth control initiatives. But such strategies to be effective need to be long term and consistent, else they will fail. It takes generations to change entrenched cultures. As for the worst overpopulated developed countries, the United States and Japan, the United Nations needs to demand they both contribute an annual overpopulation levy of say 0.1% of their respective GDP to a dedicated UN fund to fund the above-mentioned birth control initiatives in these underdeveloped nations. Both countries can more than afford this irrespective of the GFC. Both the US and Japan spend considerably more on militarism (the term 'defence' is a euphemism). The US and Japan are currently wasting hundreds of millions in chest thumping joint military exercises in the South China Sea as a show of force against North Korea. Yes they have the money! Complimentary strategies include controlling the arms trade, dealing with government corruption, adjusting trade tariffs to favour underdeveloped countries and addressing the third world debt interest burden. Charities are situated at the public interface. They are indeed perpetuating the overpopulation problem by doing nothing about birth control, yet they have the power and influence in the money they receive and the role they play to influence the outcome. This is not to say that others need not be held to account as well (mainly the governments of the overpopulated countries). Others like the UNHCR and foreign aid giving countries are also in a position to tie money to birth control. You can offer answers to your own questions. But until the rot is stopped by exposing the falsehood that charities of underdeveloped nations are doing a good job, nothing will change. I do not donate to overseas charities for this reason. Once such charities are deprived of unconditional donations, their population perpetuating behaviour will be forced to change.

Businessman Dick Smith is offering $1 million to the young Australian who can come up with a solution to bring the country's population under control.

[Source: 'Dick Smith offers $1m to population problem solver', ABC News, 11th August 2010, Paul Miller (AAP)].

Now that's putting money where his mouth is!

Dick Smith has launched the Wilberforce Award in Sydney, arguing that Australia's population doubles every 30 years and that the rate of growth is not sustainable.

Mr Smith says he is not confident the major political parties have the answers to population growth, but a young Australian might have the solution.

He says the world only has finite resources.

"I suppose I'm looking for something like a modern Bob Geldof or a Ghandi or a someone who's going to become famous around the world in communicating the basic fact that you can't always have exponential growth," he said.

is not the ultimate collective aim year in year out to achieve social prosperity, rather than the narrow minded economic growth? Should we not question the assumption that only by increasing population can a society achieve prosperity?

The ABC's online Drum forum has a useful article by ABC TV programme presenter of Stateline in NSW, Quentin Dempster, discussing the new concept of 'Ponzi Demography', that is pre-dated 5th August 2010.
'Joseph Chamie has been quoted as saying: "Like all Ponzi schemes, Ponzi demography is unsustainable. Among its primary tactics, it exploits the fear of population decline and ageing. Without a young and growing population we are warned of becoming a nation facing financial ruin and a loss of national power. Appeals are also made to one's patriotic duty to have children in order to replenish and expand the homeland."

A recommended read is the book by Tim Jackson, 'Prosperity without growth - Economics for a Finite Planet' published by Earthscan (USA) 2009.

The bias distorting the analysis of this problem is the lobbying of politicians pushing for more skilled immigration by those with vested self-interest. Typically this is big donating corporate business targeting cheap imported skilled labour so it doesn't have to spend money on training Australians. It is extreme selfishness since it says to hell with the social costs - that's government's problem!

Any wonder with short-sighted politicians buying the economic line from big donating corporate business, the traditional Australian value of the permanent full time job has been eroded to contracting and casual labour.

I preface this with - "I am not an economist" in the same sense as the well known disclaimer "I don't know much about ART but I know what I like" (but in the case of art I do know) It seems to me that if we did not have constant growth, we could afford maintenance. There is no end to the work involved in maintaining our infrastructure (apologies for using this awful word) and our homes ! Would this not provide economic activity but in a different direction? For example ,my down pipe that I have been trying to get fixed since April would now be replaced! The workman would have been paid and he would be off to the next maintenance job ! Economic activity still happens without a constant influx of new people. If the economy depends on population numbers why aren't the countries who are losing people via emigration closing their borders to the exodus? What is the ultimate goal of ever increasing GDP? Rather than the economy being seen as an abstraction or symbol of our transactions with one another, in the minds of many, it has became an end in itself!

Another financial incentive to encourage vasectomies/stop at 2, etc., is the provision of some type of security, however rudimentary, for the aged. Absence of an old-age security safety net in a society encourages parents to have numerous children to provide for them in their old age.

Mirrabooka Landfill (Atlas) is still in opperation. Its the most peutrid place to live...and even sadder, most people dont know there is a landfill there....until its too late.

Fiona raises some very good points about the failure of the organize illegal entrants onto private land. My property is on the Reserve Creek Rd stage, with the rally going directly adjacent to a riparian zone on my property subject to a 10 year commitment to the Commonwealth as a national heritage envirofund site. The rally organizers visited me and everything seemed reasonable,... until the day. As I submitted to the inquiry, the marshals failed to stop trespassers to the extent that I had 50 - 100 trespassers, climbing my trees and damaging the fence. Whats done is done. however, I have submitted some changes required for the next rally to stop all property invasion. Charltons lane was obviously identified as a great free viewing point. 20+ photographers and journalist illegally entering my land cant be wrong plus lots of freeloader spectators. 1. police to stop traffic (vehicle and pedestrian ) at Kanes rd overpass on freeway. 2. Police to stop all pedestrian traffic from entering cudgera creek rd / reserve creek rd 3. marshals not to let ANY person walk up reserve creek rd from stage start point next to kanes rd or to trespass onto neighbors property. 4. Am I entitled to stop the race if people illegally enter my property, place them self at risk (and make me liable?) and the marshals and or police fail to remove them. The Marshall basically gave up and asked me am I willing to accept the people. It became too big for me to handle. Maybe I could get some support from the No rally group members as trying to stop this myself may be too difficult.

The challenge is to find a way for economic growth, without entailing population growth. This is why Dick Smith is offering $1 million for the solution. However, with a steady state economy, without the need for growth to match population growth, surely economic stability would be sufficient. Our society's addiction to economic growth must be matched, to appease the inherent greed for wealth that obsesses our society.

The Population "Puzzle" is not really a puzzle at all, but glaringly obvious! What Dick Smith revealed were cold facts, examples and evidence to follow the dots to draw our own (inevitable) conclusions. The idiocy of population growth, when it is clearly hurting our environment, our atmosphere, our infrastructures, our liveability, and our hip pockets, is no puzzle but obvious! Why do people have such blind spots? The human herding instinct is alive and well entrenched in society. Like the Emperor with no clothes, it takes one person, with clear thinking and a public voice, to reveal the obvious! There are those in businesses, including land developers and the banks, whose interest in limitless growth are obvious - financial. However, there are the magnanimous ideal types, and the academics, Humanists and religious, who consider population growth as "human rights" issue - a global issue - that needs to be addressed by allowing more people into Australia to share the benefits of our natural resources. Why don't they go to South America? There is a lot of "vacant" land there? The academics born overseas do not have the sense of Australia's "wide brown land" and vast spaciousness that genuine Australians and indigenous people appreciate. Our government is paying orchardists to burn their fruit trees, and other market garden areas are being bulldozed for urban sprawl, never to be fertile land again. It shows the massive power of the property investment and mortgage industry in being able to hijack State and Local Councils! As Dick Smith says, we really don't know the extent climate change will have on our food growing ability! Dick Smith very neatly demolished so many myths FOR continual growth - Defence, skills shortages, ageing population, and prosperity. The global threat of population explosion is clear, and it must not be imported into Australia. We must set an example for the rest of the world. Our concerns should be global, but first, we must act local.

As a democracy, is it possible for the people who have had enough of an incompetent state government to lobby the governer to oust a government? I am appalled that in Queensland we have to wait another two years until we have a state election. So, in the meantime this arrogant and incompetent government continues to shift blame, reneg on promises, increase costs of living and shirks responsibility and accountability. Unfortunately, there isn't much of a competent opposition party (LNP) and we may have to vote them in for the sake of getting rid of Labor and their incompetence.

I watched as much of this as I could stand, I couldn't stand much. The idiocy on display was painful. We had some university lecturer explain that arguments that we are on a path of perpetual population growth and massive overpopulation are "oversimplistic". No they're not. Then someone said that Australia was "selfish" for not trying to relieve overpopulation in other countries by not immediately throwing borders open to 100s of millions of migrants. This would not relieve overpopulation in those countries (those migrants would soon be replaced by new births) but would make Australia grossly overpopulated. Then the tired old captains of industry bleating about how economic growth requires population growth. Whether they fully realize it or not what they are asking for is perpetual growth, growth neverending, growth until we number in the billions. Then government types talking about "sustainable" population, the need for a "population debate", all the while very carefully avoiding any mention of stopping Australia's population growth, something which is highly desirable and ultimately inevitable but which is anathema to both Liberal and Labor. I salute Dick Smith who sees clearly where we are headed, which is an Australia numbering in the hundreds of millions or billions of people, and is trying to do something to prevent it. Probably a lost cause, unfortunately, as growing the population is far, far easier and more attractive in the short term than stabilizing it.

Like Julius Marlowe, I detected the off note in the symphony. I'm all for population control but, why attack those who attempt to address the human suffering generated by over population? Did they cause it? Rather than blaming aid agencies that attempt to alleviate human suffering, I would focus my attack and subversive efforts on the religious and cultural institutions that undermine campaigns that promote contraceptive devices and methods. Also, who is exploiting unsustainable population growth via immigration lotto? Isn't it convenient that population growth feeds into the capitalist growth paradigm? Do the capitalists who parlay population growth via immigration into Western nations care? Does our aid program facilitate or inhibit global population growth? What influence does the christian lobby have on these policies? While everyone trusts government to act nobly in relation to foreign aid, what deals are done to appease moral perverts like Family First and George Pell? Don't start shooting until you know who and what you are shooting to effect.

"Until everyone of us stands up to religious interference in culture and demand contraception and sex ed for all there can be no solution to poverty. Poverty is after all promoted by religious corporate interests and results in overpopulation."

Pages